1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Sovereignty
no higher authority than the state
International Law
is the set of rules that states consider binding in their mutual relations. It aims to provide order, accountability, security, and predictability to international relations.
Treaties
Formal agreements between states that create binding obligations
Customary International Law
Practices that become binding over time and are considered legal obligations, not always requiring explicit consent
International Organizations
These bodies also create rules and norms that apply to member states
Monism
international law and national law form a single legal system
Dualism
international law and national legal systems are distinct, international law has limited power within a state's borders unless incorporated into its legal system
International law initially defined
the body of rules and principles of action that states consider binding in their mutual relations.
Original scope of international law
was limited to governing relations between independent states. It was concerned with how states interacted with one another. This included their conduct, agreements, and the establishment of norms that would regulate their behavior.
international law
has evolved from its original focus on the relations between states to encompass a broader range of actors, including international organizations, multinational corporations, and individuals.
Public International Law
governs the relationships between states and international organizations, as well as some of their relationships with persons. It is usually expressed in treaties or customs.
Private International Law
deals with the activities of individuals, corporations, and other private entities when they cross national borders.
Agreements
PIL involves agreements between states, while private international law does not.
Consent
In PIL, states can be held liable and this is needed through treaties, customs, and international organizations. In private international law, consent is not needed.
Scope
PIL has a broader scope, including the conduct of states and international organizations. Private international law deals with activities of private entities that cross borders.
Enforcement
PIL has an enforcement system that includes domestic enforcement systems, sanctions, and monetary remedies.
Opinio Juris
This refers to the belief that a state practice is legally binding. It's the idea that a state acts a certain way because it feels legally obligated to do so.
Consent
States are generally bound by the norms of IL through their express or implicit consent.
Horizontal Approach
This is the traditional approach where sovereign states interact as equals. It emphasizes consent, as no state can impose its will on another. Trade is often addressed in this way, where states agree on rules that apply to all.
Vertical Approach
This approach relates to individuals and human rights. States create human rights treaties, but individuals do not participate in the process of treaty creation. Therefore, consent from the individuals is not required.
Domestic System
Enforcement mechanisms are generally stronger, with a clear hierarchy of authority and means of compelling compliance.
International System
Enforcement is complex and relatively weak. It relies on domestic enforcement systems, sanctions, monetary remedies, international law is enforced through "outsourcing" and "outcasting"
Outsourcing
when international organizations give work to countries in order to maintain the international system
Outcasting
occurs when countries have been disobedient and lose certain benefits
Francisco de Vitoria
Argued that the Spanish did not have a right to the places and people they found in the Americas, since they were not conquered, and only conquest gives rights. He advocated for a single law to apply to both the Spanish and the native people.
Hugo Grotius
Shifted the basis of law from religion to natural law and reason14. He believed that principles for treaty-making could be derived from reason, and natural law is binding on all regardless of religion.
Emer de Vattel
Rationalized colonization by arguing that communities that did not engage in agriculture did not have ownership over the land.
Monism
International law and national law form a unified legal system. International law is directly integrated into the laws of each state.
Dualism
International law and national law are distinct legal orders. International law requires incorporation into domestic law to have effect.
Material Source of Law
This refers to where you would find a particular legal text, such as a treaty or code. The sources indicate that this is not a main focus.
Formal Source of Law
This refers to the processes by which legal rules come into existence in the international system. It's about how the rules are created.
Primary Sources
According to the sources, the main places to look for international law are treaties, customs, and general principles of law. These are the primary ways to adjudicate an international dispute.
Subsidiary Sources
Judicial decisions and scholarly writings are considered subsidiary sources.
Express hierarchy
Treaties 2. Customary international law (CIL) 3. General principles of law
Customary law
is an established state practice that is accepted by many countries. It is a primary source for determining the content of a legal rule. It applies to everyone regardless of whether states consented to it.
Prof. Brownlie's Four Conditions
Duration/Time 2. Consistency/Uniformity 3. Generality 4. Opinio Juris
1Duration/Time
The practice must have been in place for a long time.
Consistency/Uniformity
States must have acted consistently over time.
Generality
Enough states must have acted consistently over time. This includes both regional and general custom.
Opinio Juris
This is the belief that states have an obligation to act a certain way, fulfilling a legal obligation. It's a psychological condition where states feel obligated.
Paquete Habana and the Lola
whether fishing vessels could be seized as prizes of war, even though they were not engaged in combat, The owners of the fishing vessels argued that there was a custom exempting peaceful fishing vessels from seizure during war
General principles of law
are identified in many states as a natural law and tenets of legal logic. They can be used as a gap filler when there is no treaty or customary law.
AM&S case
whether attorney-client privilege applied in international law, The principle of attorney-client privilege was invoked, as many states recognized this in their domestic systems
Jus cogens norms
are norms of international law from which no exemption is permitted. They are considered to be of a higher status and rank than ordinary rules. These norms bind every state, regardless of treaties or customs (slavery)