Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
A component of MI spirit that communicates absolute worth, accurate empathy, affirmation, and autonomy support; The counselor accepts the individual’s decisions without judgement, honouring their worth and autonomy
The simultaneous presence of competing motivations for and against change; Simultaneously wanting and not wanting something, or wanting two incompatible things
Any client speech that favors movement toward a particular change goal. Self-expressed language that is an argument for change
4 Processes of MI
Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, Planning
Focusing
Involves developing and maintaining a specific direction in the conversation about change. The process of clarifying a goal or direction for change.
Evoking
Pertains to eliciting the clients own motivation for change
Planning
Involves developing commitment and a specific plan of action
Partnership
Equality between the counselor and the client, with no one holding superior power or control
Compassion
Keeping the individual’s best interests at heart, actively promoting their welfare and prioritizing their needs
Evocation
Drawing out the individual’s own motivations and ideas rather than imposing external ones
Open-ended Questions
Inviting the client to think and provide broad latitude in responding, fostering conversation
Affirmations
Recognizing a client’s strengths and efforts, supporting engagement and avoiding the assessment trap. Accentuation of the positive, acknowledging a person’s strengths and efforts.
Reflective Listening
Demonstrating empathy and ensuring clear communication by confirming your understanding of the client’s message
Summaries
Pull together several elements a client has communicated, shining a light on their experiences and highlighting ambivalence
Sustain Talk
Self-expressed language that is an argument against change and favours the status quo
Four types of Ambivalence
approach/approach, avoidance/avoidance, approach/avoidance, and double approach/avoidance
The Importance Ruler
Utilizing a scale from 0 to 10 to assess the importance a client places on changing
Confidence ruler
Using a scale from 0 to 10 to measure a clients confidence in their ability to change
Querying Extremes
Asking about best and worst case scenerios
Looking Back
Encourages clients to remember times before the problem emerged
Looking Forward
Helps clients envision a changed future
Gordon’s Roadblocks
Common communication styles that hinder effective counselling, such as ordering, warning advising, persuading, moralizing, judging, agreeing, shaming, interpreting, reassuring, questioning, and distracting
The Assessment Trap
Asking excessive questions and gathering information without building rapport
The Premature Focus Trap
Jumping to a specific behaviour change before understanding the client’s broader concerns
The Chat Trap
Engaging in superficial conversation rather than focusing on the change
The Labelling Trap
Assigning labels to the client
The Blaming Trap
Blaming the client for their behaviour
Cultural Humility
A continuous process of self-reflection and critique, understanding individual’s experiences in the context of power differences, and challenging power imbalances
Critical Allyship
Taking active steps to learn about systems of inequality, stepping back to allow space for marginalized voices, and working for change at systemic and interpersonal levels
Ask-Tell-Ask
Providing informations in MI, involving asking for permission, providing information neutrally, and then eliciting the clients response
Therapeutic Alliance
The establishment of a trusting relationship, agreement on treatment goals, and collaboration on tasks to reach those goals
Intersectionality
The interconnected nature of social categorization such as race, class, and gender, creating overlapping systems of discrimination or disadvantage
The Righting Reflex
The tendency to try to fix what seems wrong with people by offering advice and solutions
Approach/Approach
Two positive choices/ a win-win situation
Avoidance/Avoidance
Two negative or unpleasant choices/ representing the lesser of two evils
Approach/Avoidance
One choice that has both positives and negatives associated with it
Double Approach/Avoidance
Two options that each have both positive and negative aspects. Leaning towards one option make the benefits of the other more salient, and vice versa
Ability
A form of client preparatory change talk that reflects perceived personal capability of making a change; typical words include can, could, and able.