Criminal Law and Punishment Lecture Notes

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the principles of criminalization, constitutional limitations on government power, rationales for punishment, and key legal cases.

Last updated 3:57 PM on 8/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

25 Terms

1
New cards

Abuse-of-discretion standard

A deferential standard used by a state appellate court to review a trial court’s sentencing decision in a criminal case.

2
New cards

Substituted-discretion standard

An alternative standard to abuse-of-discretion used by appellate courts to review sentencing decisions.

3
New cards

Victimization impacts

The consequences of a crime categorized into physical, emotional/mental, social, and financial impacts.

4
New cards

Secondary victimization

Additional emotional harm endured by crime victims during interactions with the criminal justice system (police, prosecutors, judges, or the trial process).

5
New cards

Three sources of criminal law

The Constitution, statutory/regulatory law, and common law.

6
New cards

Article 3, Sec. 3

The section of the United States Constitution that defines the crime of treason.

7
New cards

Legality principle

The principle 'No crime without law, no punishment without law' which prohibits retroactive criminal liability.

8
New cards

Rule of specificity

The requirement that criminal laws be sufficiently understandable and specific to guide the public and law enforcement on prohibited conduct.

9
New cards

Rule of Lenity

The principle that an unresolvedly ambiguous criminal statute should be interpreted in favor of the defendant.

10
New cards

Bill of Attainder

A legislative act prohibited by Article 1, Section 9 that targets a specific group for punishment without trial, such as in United States v. Brown.

11
New cards

Ex post facto laws

Laws prohibited by Article 1, Section 10 that apply retroactively by criminalizing prior legal acts, increasing punishment severity, or changing evidence rules to favor conviction.

12
New cards

Due Process (14th Amendment)

Prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property by means that are arbitrary or fundamentally unfair.

13
New cards

Lawrence v. Texas

A case establishing that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause includes a right to liberty regarding the intimacies of physical relationships.

14
New cards

Equal Protection Clause

A provision of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibiting state and local governments from treating individuals or classes differently under similar circumstances without justification.

15
New cards

Loving v. Virginia

A case ruling that states cannot prevent marriages between persons solely based on racial classification under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses.

16
New cards

Robinson v. California

A case ruling that imprinting a criminal sanction solely for addiction to narcotics violates the Eighth Amendment.

17
New cards

Retributivism

A backward-looking philosophical school of punishment focused on the defendant's desert rather than future benefit or vengeance.

18
New cards

Rehabilitation

A forward-looking utilitarian rationale that views criminal behavior as a correctable character defect that can be rectified through punishment.

19
New cards

Incapacitation

A forward-looking rationale aiming to reduce crime by removing the defendant from society, usually through prison custody.

20
New cards

Specific deterrence

A forward-looking rationale intended to teach a specific defendant a lesson to prevent them from reoffending.

21
New cards

General deterrence

A forward-looking rationale intended to teach society a lesson to prevent future crimes by others.

22
New cards

Trop v. Dulles

A case ruling that revocation of citizenship as punishment violates the Eighth Amendment and establishes the 'evolving standards of decency' analysis.

23
New cards

Evolving standards of decency analysis

A three-step analysis considering (1) historical practice, (2) current societal consensus, and (3) the court’s independent judgment.

24
New cards

Ingraham v. Wright

A case ruling that corporal punishment of public schoolchildren does not violate the Eighth Amendment and does not require a prior hearing.

25
New cards

Pragmatic constraints on punishment

Economic limitations that have recently led to changes in thinking regarding the constant push for more and longer punishments.