Selective attention IIII

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

How is selective attention related to ageing

  • Our ability to select and prioritise information depends upon sensory systems, knowledge and memory capacity

  • This perception and cognition changes across a life span

2
New cards

Selective attention and development (Enns and Brodeur, 1989)

  • Investigated covert attention in observers aged 6,8 and 20 years, (in the absence of eye movement)

  • Used peripheral cues

  • Used short cue target onset asynchronous, the time between the cue and the target is short to maximise exogenous attention

  • Cue location was predictive (80%) of target or unpredictable (random)

  • They are manipulating the endogenous aspect of the cue

3
New cards

Correlation between selective attention and development

  • Reaction time to stimuli decreased with age

  • Costs associated with invalid cues decreased with age, younger participants found it harder to reorient attention from an invalid cue location

  • Reaction times for adults are faster to targets at valid locations for predictable but not unpredictable cues

  • Reaction time for children comparable to predictable and unpredictable cues

  • Children and adults automatically orient attention towards peripheral cue (bottom up stimulus)

4
New cards

Selective attention and development (Konrad et al 2005)

  • Used fMRI to compare brain activation in children 8-12 years and adults 20-34 years during different components of attention

  • Alerting, reorienting and executive attention

5
New cards

Results of Konrad et al 2005

  • Children showed a smaller alerting effect and don’t benefit much from a mitigating effect

  • Children showed a significantly larger invalid cost

  • Children showed a significantly larger interference effect

  • Children are less efficient at dealing with competition associated attention

6
New cards

Brain regions associated with alerting in adults vs children

  • Adults have a much bigger response > children

  • Right cingulate gyrus

  • This is the part of the brain that matures as it prepares you to make a response

7
New cards

Brain regions associated with reorienting in adults vs children

  • Adults > children:

  • Right inferior frontal gyrus

  • Right temporo -parietal cortex

  • Children > adults:

  • Superior frontal gyrus

  • Superior temporal gyrus

8
New cards

How are behavioural and fMRI data consistent

  • Consistent with fractionation of attentional processes, you can distinguish orienting, from alerting and executive control

  • Activation in response to alerting, orienting and executive attention in adults evidence top down modulation via frontoparietal attentional network

9
New cards

What is FPAN

  • Frontoparietal attention network

  • A control network

  • A top down modulation of sensory input by FPAN is less established in children

10
New cards

What physiological changes are associated with selective attention and ageing

  • Physiological changes reduce the acuity of sensory receptors eg presbycusis and presbyopia

  • Ageing is associated with physiological and cognitive changes

  • Physiological changes operate to reduce the acuity of your sensory receptors

11
New cards

What cognitive changes are associated with selective attention and ageing

  • Chrystallised abilities, knowledge and vocabulary

  • Fluid abilities, ability to process and solve problems eg processing speed and memory (Murman, 2015)

12
New cards

How does sensory acuity affect attention

  • Changes in sensory acuity and cognition affect attention

  • Visual search for conjunction but not feature targets decline in older observers

  • Contributes to a deficit in top down prioritisation of relevant features

13
New cards

What is SSVEP

  • Steady state visual evoked potential

  • Measures top down enhancement and suppression of task relevant/irrelevant stimuli over time

  • Important to equate perceptual discriminability of stimuli eg isolate the top down control