1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
How is selective attention related to ageing
Our ability to select and prioritise information depends upon sensory systems, knowledge and memory capacity
This perception and cognition changes across a life span
Selective attention and development (Enns and Brodeur, 1989)
Investigated covert attention in observers aged 6,8 and 20 years, (in the absence of eye movement)
Used peripheral cues
Used short cue target onset asynchronous, the time between the cue and the target is short to maximise exogenous attention
Cue location was predictive (80%) of target or unpredictable (random)
They are manipulating the endogenous aspect of the cue
Correlation between selective attention and development
Reaction time to stimuli decreased with age
Costs associated with invalid cues decreased with age, younger participants found it harder to reorient attention from an invalid cue location
Reaction times for adults are faster to targets at valid locations for predictable but not unpredictable cues
Reaction time for children comparable to predictable and unpredictable cues
Children and adults automatically orient attention towards peripheral cue (bottom up stimulus)
Selective attention and development (Konrad et al 2005)
Used fMRI to compare brain activation in children 8-12 years and adults 20-34 years during different components of attention
Alerting, reorienting and executive attention
Results of Konrad et al 2005
Children showed a smaller alerting effect and don’t benefit much from a mitigating effect
Children showed a significantly larger invalid cost
Children showed a significantly larger interference effect
Children are less efficient at dealing with competition associated attention
Brain regions associated with alerting in adults vs children
Adults have a much bigger response > children
Right cingulate gyrus
This is the part of the brain that matures as it prepares you to make a response
Brain regions associated with reorienting in adults vs children
Adults > children:
Right inferior frontal gyrus
Right temporo -parietal cortex
Children > adults:
Superior frontal gyrus
Superior temporal gyrus
How are behavioural and fMRI data consistent
Consistent with fractionation of attentional processes, you can distinguish orienting, from alerting and executive control
Activation in response to alerting, orienting and executive attention in adults evidence top down modulation via frontoparietal attentional network
What is FPAN
Frontoparietal attention network
A control network
A top down modulation of sensory input by FPAN is less established in children
What physiological changes are associated with selective attention and ageing
Physiological changes reduce the acuity of sensory receptors eg presbycusis and presbyopia
Ageing is associated with physiological and cognitive changes
Physiological changes operate to reduce the acuity of your sensory receptors
What cognitive changes are associated with selective attention and ageing
Chrystallised abilities, knowledge and vocabulary
Fluid abilities, ability to process and solve problems eg processing speed and memory (Murman, 2015)
How does sensory acuity affect attention
Changes in sensory acuity and cognition affect attention
Visual search for conjunction but not feature targets decline in older observers
Contributes to a deficit in top down prioritisation of relevant features
What is SSVEP
Steady state visual evoked potential
Measures top down enhancement and suppression of task relevant/irrelevant stimuli over time
Important to equate perceptual discriminability of stimuli eg isolate the top down control