MGHA12 FINAL

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 35 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/117

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

fully updated-ish (apr8)

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

118 Terms

1
New cards

Selection

the process of choosing individuals with relevant qualitifcations that can fill job openings

2
New cards

Selection process steps (7)

Complete application (resume), Interview with HR, Employment testing (aptitiude), Preliminary selection in HR dept (round one complete), supervisor/team interview, references & background check, hiring decision

3
New cards

Examples of selection tests

cognitive abilities 9SAT, GRE, GMAT, LSAT), motor skills, physical abilities, job knowledge tests, work samples, integrity, substance abuse

4
New cards

Quality of selection test

How well a test measures a candidates attributes & predicts their future performance.

5
New cards

2 qualities of the Quality of selection test

Reliability, same results over and over again and cross diff people at diff times. Validity, test measures what it claims to measure and predicts relevant behaviors.

6
New cards

3 test of reliability

test retest (same results over time), internal consistency (ensures the test measures one concept, known as cronbach’s alpha), inter-rater reliability (agreement/similarity between multiple raters on a scale of 0.0-1.0)

7
New cards

3 types of validity

content validity (covers all aspect of a job), construct validity (includes convergent and divergent, test correlates and test does not correlate respectively), criternion related validity (includes predictive and concurrent, predicts future sucess, aligns with current performance)

8
New cards

rational approaches to validity definition

focuses on making sure a test effectively measured what it’s meant to assess in a logical and relevant way, includes 4 key parts

9
New cards

4 types of rational approaches to validity

content validity, face validity, criterion validity, incremental validity

10
New cards

content validity is assesed by

SMEs, subject matter expers, ensures if the test measures the right things

11
New cards

face validity measures

measures if applicants think the test is relevant and appropriate, does it seem job related (reference to that vid of the guy getting tested 100x by his boss when applying to a new job)

12
New cards

criterion related validity

is there a relation between test scores and job performance?

13
New cards

2 types of criterion validity

predicitive, concurrent. predictive measures test scores, then job performance, concurrent does both at once

14
New cards

incremental validity

asks whether adding a new test could improve accuract of a selection method.

15
New cards

9 box grid definition

used to evaluate people and minimize errors in hiring and promotion by accurately predicting job performance.

16
New cards

4 types of selection errors

true positive, true negative, false positve, false negative

17
New cards

true positive explained

Ideal selection for a candidate, good exam scores mean good job performance

18
New cards

true negative meaning

true negative, an ideal rejected candidate, bad exam score means bad job performance

19
New cards

false positive meaning

you’d assume good exam = good performance, but these poeple got picked because of good scores and suck at their job

20
New cards

false negative meaning

you’d assume these candidates will do a bad job because they did bad on the exams, but they’re actually really good at the job.

21
New cards

impacts of false negative and positive

false positives are costly, we hire underperformeres based on a misleading indicator. false negatives are lost potential, we didn’t hire them based on a misleading indicator.

22
New cards

validity coefficients & their meanings

r>0.5, great predictor. 0.3<r<0.5, good predictor. r<0.3, not good predictor.

23
New cards

the goal of adding more predictors is to

increase r² in tests, examples include overlapping predictors = redundancy, or independant predictors which can be + or - correlated with the job

24
New cards

utility meaning

how much a selection process improves the minimum efficiency of an organization through better hiring decisions, better job performance prediction, better roi. high utility = positive impact on company

25
New cards

asa model

attention-selection-attrition model, explains how organizations shap workfoce through attraction, selection attrition. people apply to attractive organizations, selection means that individuals who fit job requirements and company culture is seletcted, attrition means people who dont fit eventually leave either voluntarily or unvoluntarity.

26
New cards

3 types of interviews

structured, unstructured, situational. also includes behavioral interviews

27
New cards

3 methods of interviewing someone

standard interview (1-1), sequential interview (many interviewers over days), pannel interviews (1 interview, multiple interviewers)

28
New cards

4 methods of making a hiring decision

clinical SME strategy (evaluate all info, make an overall judgement), statistical strategy (use a formila with predictors and hire whoever has the highets predicted performance), multiple hurdle approach (multiple predictors, pass one predictor and you move to the next, hire the person with the highest last score), banding (multiple predictors, people in a certain scoreset is equal).

29
New cards

Training

systemic accquisition of attitudes, concepts, knowledge, roles or skills that result in imporved performancfe at work

30
New cards

importance of training

improves performance, gives employees experience, it’s costly so it’s an investment of time and resources

31
New cards

types of training

orientation, on tje job, managerial, sales, exec, it, customer service, compliance, ethics, diversity

32
New cards

4 parts of strategic model of training

needs assesment, designing the program, implementation, evaluating training program.

33
New cards

methods of evaluating programs using 4 dimensions of validity

face validity, transfer validity, intraorganizational, interorganizational

34
New cards

performance management

an ongoing provess of reviewing a job’s performance overall

35
New cards

pm systems fail because of 3 things

performance criteria, procedures, feedback

36
New cards

performance criterion

an evaluation standard used to measure an employee level of performance

37
New cards

criterion defficiency

ignores key aspects of the job within the evaluation

38
New cards

criterion contamination

the evaluation includes irrelevant things to the job

39
New cards

Criterion relevance

includes exactly what you should measure wihtin the job evaluatoin. a bigger area = more relevant things and less stupid. a smaller area = more contaminated and defficient, not much to evaluate on that actually relates to the job

40
New cards

Subjective criteria

depends on rater, lower accuracy and usefulness bc of the uniqueness/level of subjectivity, better for soft skills evaluation, rater bias is present

41
New cards

objective criteria

verifiable by multiple users, usually quantitative, hard data prevents rater bias

42
New cards

components of basic performance measurement framework

  1. employee goals have to align with overall company goals: ex, increase calls from 5 to 10 an hour = increase customer engagement via phone by 20%

  2. behavioral expectations + standards set = clear guideliens for employees

  3. ongoing performance feedback = not just annual, more than 1 time

  4. performance apprisal by manager

  5. formal review session = structured meeting to understand current progress and projected progress + future

  6. hr decision making = data from steps 1-5 affects pay + promotion

43
New cards

2 purposes/types of a performance feedback

developmental vs. administrative

44
New cards

developmental feedback

(here’s how to improve) provives eprformance feedback, celebrates accomplishments, analyzes goals, looks into future steps throuhg individual and company training, allows employee feedback

45
New cards

administrative feedbck

(here’s how you performed) retention, layoffs, termination, promotion. finds ways to fix performance issues, evaluates training process + programs

46
New cards

types of performance reviews

manager/supervisor eval, self eval, suboordinate eval, employee eval of managers, team eval, customer/client eval, 360 degree eval

47
New cards

360 degree evaluations

feedback from everyone who’s involved w u: superiors, peers, subordinates etc, multuple sources, more comprehensive, less bias, mroe feedback

48
New cards

confirmation bias

the tendancy to focus on info that confirms their initial thoughts/biases ab a person. ex: manager thinks employee is lazy, so manager focuses on their misses deadliens and ignores their extra effprts to improve.

49
New cards

errors in performance management

halo/horn effect, distributional error, central tendency, leniency/strictness, temporal/recency, contrast, similar to me

50
New cards

halo effect

employee evaluations are all positive bc of one positive aspect of one person. ex: someone is very attractive, therefore they get very positive reveiws and can do no wrong, a form of bias.

51
New cards

horn effect

one negative thing = fully negative reviews, opposite of halo

52
New cards

distributional errors

how emplpyee performance ratings are spread across a team or organization, showcases simialarity of variety present in the ratings, includes bell curve, right and left skewed

53
New cards

bell curve

normal distirbutions, everyones sprt of avg, some otliers on high and low end (error of central tendency?)

54
New cards

right skewed

knwon as LENIENCY BIAS. eveyones rated super high which is why it’s condensed on the right side, theyre all above avg (bell)

55
New cards

left skewed

known as STRICTNESS BIAS. condensed on left side, more critical and majority arent meeting standarfs

56
New cards

contrast error

comparison between emplpyees, not emloyees to job standard

57
New cards

similar-to-me bias (homophily)

manager rates employee higher bc theyre similar via backgound, attitiudes, traits, etc. similarity dne competence however

58
New cards

other types of pr methods

trait methods, graphic rating scale, essay method, critical incident method, results based/objective goals, balanced scorecard

59
New cards

trait methods

focuses on perfornality traits or soft skills.

60
New cards

grpahic rating scale

numeric scale rating 1-5 for competencies

61
New cards

essay method

manager writes narrative summary ab emplpyees performance

62
New cards

critical icnidenth method

focuses on extreme and specific examples of good/bad behavior.

63
New cards

results based/objective goals

kpis, more qualtifiable data focused

64
New cards

balanced scorecrd

evaluates performance scross financial, customer, internal processes, learning +growth

65
New cards

Conducting Performance Review Meetings, methods of giving feedback

tell-sell, tell-listen, problem solving

66
New cards

tell-sell

manger communicates feedback, persuades employee to accept it

67
New cards

tell-listen

manager shares feedback + listens to employee pov

68
New cards

problem solving

both work tg to create action plan focusion on solitions not js criticism

69
New cards

management by objectives (mbo)

goal based review process, employees are rates on pre set objectives thats decuided w employee and manager.

70
New cards

behavior observation scale (bos)

rates employees on specific observable behaviors, not traits, rated on a frequency scale.

71
New cards

3 types of compensation

direct, indirect, nonfinancial

72
New cards

challenges to strategic compensation

firm policies/practices, compensation options available, level of equity within compensation system

73
New cards

2 theories relating to employee motivation and compensation

equity & expectancy theory

74
New cards

equity theory

employee oerception that compensaiton = value of work performed

75
New cards

expectancy theory

increase employee effort = increased value in reward

76
New cards

2 methods of establishing base pay rates

establishing internal and external equity

77
New cards

internal equity (focuses on internal organizationla pay)

job eval, similar jobs = similar pay

78
New cards

external equity (focuses on comparison to outsiders/competitors)

wage/salary survey, wage curves (mathematical/grpahical model that sets midpoint pay for a paygrade absed on amrket info/benchmarking)

79
New cards

job evaluation system

determines worth of jobs in the organization to establish an approach to payment

80
New cards

methods of job evaluation systems

job ranking, classifucation, point system

81
New cards

job ranking

ranks jobs based on raters pov of the importance of job

82
New cards

job classification system

jobs are classified and grouped according to predetrmined wage grades

83
New cards

point system/method definition + steps

assigning points to each job, more points = more relevance, implied to have higher pay, needs a point manual to assign points.

1. determine clusters of jobs to be eval

  1. colelct job info

  2. select and define factors that can be compensated (skill, effort, responsibility, working condition)

  3. define factor degrees (bachelors, masters)

  4. determine factor weights

  5. assign points to factors and degrees

example: HR assistant, BSc (75), supervision of teams (60)=135 vs. HR Manager, MSc (100), supervision of depts (90) = 190. 100-150 = grade 1, 150-200 = grade 2 pay

84
New cards

pay structures

hourly, daily, salaried, piecework

85
New cards

the pay mix

refers to how orgaanization structures total employee compensation (ex: base, comission, benefits, etc). takes into consideration of internal (ex: job worth) and external factors (ex: cost of living, benchmarking) related to compensatino that make up the pay mix.

86
New cards

draw what a pay grade structure looks like and explain it

dots = employees, rectangles = paygrades, range for max and mins in each grade, axis pay vs points

87
New cards

types of market pay lines

match line = matches competitiors good balance of competitiveness and budget, lead line = higher then market attrtacts talent increases costs, lag line = lower then market saves money but risky turnover

88
New cards

3 ways of determining pay increases

seniority, cost of living adjustments, lump sum increases

89
New cards

seniority

time spent in org/on a job which is used ot determine potential extra benefits or rewards

90
New cards

cost of living adjustments (cola)

% incrwase in wages to maintine real wage in a period of economic inflation (matching wages to combat inflation)

91
New cards

lump sum increases (LSI)

one time payment or yearly pay increase that does not increase base wages

92
New cards

variable pay

tying payment amount to some measure of characteristics or performance

93
New cards

incentive plans

establishing performance threshold to qualify for incentive payments

94
New cards

4 factors to consider in int’l environments

political, economic, sociocultural, technlological

95
New cards

expatriates/home country nationals

employees from a home country who are in another country on a work assignment

96
New cards

three things can lead to expatriate failure

fmaily adjustment (difficult to go overseas), work adjustment (difficult to adjust in new environment with work??), bad selection

97
New cards

host country nations

employees who are natives of the host country

98
New cards

third country nationals

emplpoyees who are natives of a country other then the home country ot the host country (3rd party country?)

99
New cards

work permit/visa

document issued by govt granting authority to a foreign perosn to seek work in that govt’s country

100
New cards

2 types of wokr permints/visa

open permit, employer specific