1/117
fully updated-ish (apr8)
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Selection
the process of choosing individuals with relevant qualitifcations that can fill job openings
Selection process steps (7)
Complete application (resume), Interview with HR, Employment testing (aptitiude), Preliminary selection in HR dept (round one complete), supervisor/team interview, references & background check, hiring decision
Examples of selection tests
cognitive abilities 9SAT, GRE, GMAT, LSAT), motor skills, physical abilities, job knowledge tests, work samples, integrity, substance abuse
Quality of selection test
How well a test measures a candidates attributes & predicts their future performance.
2 qualities of the Quality of selection test
Reliability, same results over and over again and cross diff people at diff times. Validity, test measures what it claims to measure and predicts relevant behaviors.
3 test of reliability
test retest (same results over time), internal consistency (ensures the test measures one concept, known as cronbach’s alpha), inter-rater reliability (agreement/similarity between multiple raters on a scale of 0.0-1.0)
3 types of validity
content validity (covers all aspect of a job), construct validity (includes convergent and divergent, test correlates and test does not correlate respectively), criternion related validity (includes predictive and concurrent, predicts future sucess, aligns with current performance)
rational approaches to validity definition
focuses on making sure a test effectively measured what it’s meant to assess in a logical and relevant way, includes 4 key parts
4 types of rational approaches to validity
content validity, face validity, criterion validity, incremental validity
content validity is assesed by
SMEs, subject matter expers, ensures if the test measures the right things
face validity measures
measures if applicants think the test is relevant and appropriate, does it seem job related (reference to that vid of the guy getting tested 100x by his boss when applying to a new job)
criterion related validity
is there a relation between test scores and job performance?
2 types of criterion validity
predicitive, concurrent. predictive measures test scores, then job performance, concurrent does both at once
incremental validity
asks whether adding a new test could improve accuract of a selection method.
9 box grid definition
used to evaluate people and minimize errors in hiring and promotion by accurately predicting job performance.
4 types of selection errors
true positive, true negative, false positve, false negative
true positive explained
Ideal selection for a candidate, good exam scores mean good job performance
true negative meaning
true negative, an ideal rejected candidate, bad exam score means bad job performance
false positive meaning
you’d assume good exam = good performance, but these poeple got picked because of good scores and suck at their job
false negative meaning
you’d assume these candidates will do a bad job because they did bad on the exams, but they’re actually really good at the job.
impacts of false negative and positive
false positives are costly, we hire underperformeres based on a misleading indicator. false negatives are lost potential, we didn’t hire them based on a misleading indicator.
validity coefficients & their meanings
r>0.5, great predictor. 0.3<r<0.5, good predictor. r<0.3, not good predictor.
the goal of adding more predictors is to
increase r² in tests, examples include overlapping predictors = redundancy, or independant predictors which can be + or - correlated with the job
utility meaning
how much a selection process improves the minimum efficiency of an organization through better hiring decisions, better job performance prediction, better roi. high utility = positive impact on company
asa model
attention-selection-attrition model, explains how organizations shap workfoce through attraction, selection attrition. people apply to attractive organizations, selection means that individuals who fit job requirements and company culture is seletcted, attrition means people who dont fit eventually leave either voluntarily or unvoluntarity.
3 types of interviews
structured, unstructured, situational. also includes behavioral interviews
3 methods of interviewing someone
standard interview (1-1), sequential interview (many interviewers over days), pannel interviews (1 interview, multiple interviewers)
4 methods of making a hiring decision
clinical SME strategy (evaluate all info, make an overall judgement), statistical strategy (use a formila with predictors and hire whoever has the highets predicted performance), multiple hurdle approach (multiple predictors, pass one predictor and you move to the next, hire the person with the highest last score), banding (multiple predictors, people in a certain scoreset is equal).
Training
systemic accquisition of attitudes, concepts, knowledge, roles or skills that result in imporved performancfe at work
importance of training
improves performance, gives employees experience, it’s costly so it’s an investment of time and resources
types of training
orientation, on tje job, managerial, sales, exec, it, customer service, compliance, ethics, diversity
4 parts of strategic model of training
needs assesment, designing the program, implementation, evaluating training program.
methods of evaluating programs using 4 dimensions of validity
face validity, transfer validity, intraorganizational, interorganizational
performance management
an ongoing provess of reviewing a job’s performance overall
pm systems fail because of 3 things
performance criteria, procedures, feedback
performance criterion
an evaluation standard used to measure an employee level of performance
criterion defficiency
ignores key aspects of the job within the evaluation
criterion contamination
the evaluation includes irrelevant things to the job
Criterion relevance
includes exactly what you should measure wihtin the job evaluatoin. a bigger area = more relevant things and less stupid. a smaller area = more contaminated and defficient, not much to evaluate on that actually relates to the job
Subjective criteria
depends on rater, lower accuracy and usefulness bc of the uniqueness/level of subjectivity, better for soft skills evaluation, rater bias is present
objective criteria
verifiable by multiple users, usually quantitative, hard data prevents rater bias
components of basic performance measurement framework
employee goals have to align with overall company goals: ex, increase calls from 5 to 10 an hour = increase customer engagement via phone by 20%
behavioral expectations + standards set = clear guideliens for employees
ongoing performance feedback = not just annual, more than 1 time
performance apprisal by manager
formal review session = structured meeting to understand current progress and projected progress + future
hr decision making = data from steps 1-5 affects pay + promotion
2 purposes/types of a performance feedback
developmental vs. administrative
developmental feedback
(here’s how to improve) provives eprformance feedback, celebrates accomplishments, analyzes goals, looks into future steps throuhg individual and company training, allows employee feedback
administrative feedbck
(here’s how you performed) retention, layoffs, termination, promotion. finds ways to fix performance issues, evaluates training process + programs
types of performance reviews
manager/supervisor eval, self eval, suboordinate eval, employee eval of managers, team eval, customer/client eval, 360 degree eval
360 degree evaluations
feedback from everyone who’s involved w u: superiors, peers, subordinates etc, multuple sources, more comprehensive, less bias, mroe feedback
confirmation bias
the tendancy to focus on info that confirms their initial thoughts/biases ab a person. ex: manager thinks employee is lazy, so manager focuses on their misses deadliens and ignores their extra effprts to improve.
errors in performance management
halo/horn effect, distributional error, central tendency, leniency/strictness, temporal/recency, contrast, similar to me
halo effect
employee evaluations are all positive bc of one positive aspect of one person. ex: someone is very attractive, therefore they get very positive reveiws and can do no wrong, a form of bias.
horn effect
one negative thing = fully negative reviews, opposite of halo
distributional errors
how emplpyee performance ratings are spread across a team or organization, showcases simialarity of variety present in the ratings, includes bell curve, right and left skewed
bell curve
normal distirbutions, everyones sprt of avg, some otliers on high and low end (error of central tendency?)
right skewed
knwon as LENIENCY BIAS. eveyones rated super high which is why it’s condensed on the right side, theyre all above avg (bell)
left skewed
known as STRICTNESS BIAS. condensed on left side, more critical and majority arent meeting standarfs
contrast error
comparison between emplpyees, not emloyees to job standard
similar-to-me bias (homophily)
manager rates employee higher bc theyre similar via backgound, attitiudes, traits, etc. similarity dne competence however
other types of pr methods
trait methods, graphic rating scale, essay method, critical incident method, results based/objective goals, balanced scorecard
trait methods
focuses on perfornality traits or soft skills.
grpahic rating scale
numeric scale rating 1-5 for competencies
essay method
manager writes narrative summary ab emplpyees performance
critical icnidenth method
focuses on extreme and specific examples of good/bad behavior.
results based/objective goals
kpis, more qualtifiable data focused
balanced scorecrd
evaluates performance scross financial, customer, internal processes, learning +growth
Conducting Performance Review Meetings, methods of giving feedback
tell-sell, tell-listen, problem solving
tell-sell
manger communicates feedback, persuades employee to accept it
tell-listen
manager shares feedback + listens to employee pov
problem solving
both work tg to create action plan focusion on solitions not js criticism
management by objectives (mbo)
goal based review process, employees are rates on pre set objectives thats decuided w employee and manager.
behavior observation scale (bos)
rates employees on specific observable behaviors, not traits, rated on a frequency scale.
3 types of compensation
direct, indirect, nonfinancial
challenges to strategic compensation
firm policies/practices, compensation options available, level of equity within compensation system
2 theories relating to employee motivation and compensation
equity & expectancy theory
equity theory
employee oerception that compensaiton = value of work performed
expectancy theory
increase employee effort = increased value in reward
2 methods of establishing base pay rates
establishing internal and external equity
internal equity (focuses on internal organizationla pay)
job eval, similar jobs = similar pay
external equity (focuses on comparison to outsiders/competitors)
wage/salary survey, wage curves (mathematical/grpahical model that sets midpoint pay for a paygrade absed on amrket info/benchmarking)
job evaluation system
determines worth of jobs in the organization to establish an approach to payment
methods of job evaluation systems
job ranking, classifucation, point system
job ranking
ranks jobs based on raters pov of the importance of job
job classification system
jobs are classified and grouped according to predetrmined wage grades
point system/method definition + steps
assigning points to each job, more points = more relevance, implied to have higher pay, needs a point manual to assign points.
1. determine clusters of jobs to be eval
colelct job info
select and define factors that can be compensated (skill, effort, responsibility, working condition)
define factor degrees (bachelors, masters)
determine factor weights
assign points to factors and degrees
example: HR assistant, BSc (75), supervision of teams (60)=135 vs. HR Manager, MSc (100), supervision of depts (90) = 190. 100-150 = grade 1, 150-200 = grade 2 pay
pay structures
hourly, daily, salaried, piecework
the pay mix
refers to how orgaanization structures total employee compensation (ex: base, comission, benefits, etc). takes into consideration of internal (ex: job worth) and external factors (ex: cost of living, benchmarking) related to compensatino that make up the pay mix.
draw what a pay grade structure looks like and explain it
dots = employees, rectangles = paygrades, range for max and mins in each grade, axis pay vs points
types of market pay lines
match line = matches competitiors good balance of competitiveness and budget, lead line = higher then market attrtacts talent increases costs, lag line = lower then market saves money but risky turnover
3 ways of determining pay increases
seniority, cost of living adjustments, lump sum increases
seniority
time spent in org/on a job which is used ot determine potential extra benefits or rewards
cost of living adjustments (cola)
% incrwase in wages to maintine real wage in a period of economic inflation (matching wages to combat inflation)
lump sum increases (LSI)
one time payment or yearly pay increase that does not increase base wages
variable pay
tying payment amount to some measure of characteristics or performance
incentive plans
establishing performance threshold to qualify for incentive payments
4 factors to consider in int’l environments
political, economic, sociocultural, technlological
expatriates/home country nationals
employees from a home country who are in another country on a work assignment
three things can lead to expatriate failure
fmaily adjustment (difficult to go overseas), work adjustment (difficult to adjust in new environment with work??), bad selection
host country nations
employees who are natives of the host country
third country nationals
emplpoyees who are natives of a country other then the home country ot the host country (3rd party country?)
work permit/visa
document issued by govt granting authority to a foreign perosn to seek work in that govt’s country
2 types of wokr permints/visa
open permit, employer specific