XP- 4- Defining and Measuring Variables

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 9 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/64

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

65 Terms

1
New cards

Theory

set of statements about the mechanisms underlying a particular behavior.

2
New cards

Theory

help organize and unify different observations of the behavior and its relationship with other variables

3
New cards

Theory

a good - generates predictions about behavior

4
New cards

Constructs

hypothetical attributes or mechanisms that help explain and predict behavior in theory

5
New cards
  1. Manipulation of antecedent conditions

  2. Antecedent condition must have two different conditions

  3. Measure the response of behavior of subjects as a result of the treatment condition

A psychology experiment has three main features:

6
New cards

Independent variable

the antecedent condition an experimenter intentionally manipulates

7
New cards

Levels

the values of the IV created by the experimenter

8
New cards

2

an experiment requires atleast - levels

9
New cards

Confounded

An experiment is - when when the value of an extraneous variable systematically changes along with the independent variable

10
New cards

Dependent variable

the outcome measure the experimenter uses to assess the change in behavior produced by the independent variable.

11
New cards

Operational definition

the outcome measure the experimenter uses to assess the change in behavior produced by the independent variable.

12
New cards

Operational definition

procedure for indirectly measuring and defining a variable that cannot be observed or measured directly

13
New cards

Operational definition

specifies a measurement procedure (a set of operations) for measuring an external, observable behavior and uses the resulting measurements as a definition and a measurement of the hypothetical construct.

14
New cards

Experimental operational definition

specifies the exact procedure for creating values of the independent variable.

15
New cards

Measured operational definition

specifies the exact procedure for measuring the dependent variable.

16
New cards

Nominal scale

assigns items to two or more distinct categories that can be named using a shared feature, but does not measure their magnitude.

17
New cards

Ordinal scale

measures the magnitude of the dependent variable using ranks, but does not assign precise values.

18
New cards

Interval scale

measure the magnitude of the dependent variable using equal intervals between values with no absolute zero point.

19
New cards

Ratio scale

measures the magnitude of the dependent variable using equal intervals between values and an absolute zero.

20
New cards

Positive relationship

the two measurements change together in the same direction

21
New cards

Negative relationship

two measurements change in opposite directions

22
New cards

Reliability

refers to the consistency of experimental operational definitions and measured operational definitions.

23
New cards

Reliability

stability or consistency of the measurement

24
New cards

Interrater reliability

the degree to which observers agree in the measurement of the behavior.

25
New cards

Test-retest reliability

means the degree to which a person's scores are consistent across two or more administrations of a measurement procedure.

26
New cards

Test-retest reliability

The reliability estimate obtained by comparing the scores obtained from two successive measurements is commonly called

27
New cards

Parallel-forms reliability

When different versions of the instrument are used for the test and the retest, the reliability measure is often called

28
New cards

Inter-rater reliability

is the degree to which observers agree in the measurement of the behavior.

29
New cards

Interitem reliability

measures the degree to which different parts of an instrument (questionnaire or test) that are designed to measure the same variable achieve consistent results.

30
New cards

Split-half reliability

obtained by splitting the items on a questionnaire or test in half, computing a separate score for each half, and then calculating the degree of consistency between the two scores for a group of participants.

31
New cards

Validity

means the operational definition accurately manipulates the independent variable or measures the dependent variable.

32
New cards

Validity

the degree to which the measurement process measures the variable that it claims to measure.

33
New cards

Face validity

is the degree to which the validity of a manipulation or measurement technique is self-evident.

34
New cards

Face validity

least stringent form of validity

35
New cards

Content validity

means how accurately a measurement procedure samples the content of the dependent variable.

36
New cards

Predictive validity

means how accurately a measurement procedure predicts future performance.

37
New cards

Predictive validity

demonstrated when scores obtained from a measure accurately predict behavior according to a theory

38
New cards

Construct validity

how accurately an operational definition represents a construct.

39
New cards

Construct validity

reqires that the scores obtained from a measurement procedure behave exactly the same as the variable itself.

40
New cards

Concurrent validity

demonstrated when scores obtained from a new measure are directly related to scores obtained from an established measure of the same variable.

41
New cards

Convergent validity

demonstrated by a strong relationship between the scores obtained from two (or more) different methods of measuring the same construct.

42
New cards

Divergent validity

demonstrated by showing little or no relationship between the measurements of two different constructs.

43
New cards

Internal validity

the degrees to which changes in the dependent variable across treatment conditions were due to the independent variable.

44
New cards

Internal validity

establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

45
New cards

Self-report measure

probably the most direct way to assess a construct.

46
New cards

Physiological measures

involve brain-imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

47
New cards

Behavioral measures

provide researchers with a vast number of options, making it possible to select the behaviors that seem to be best for defining and measuring the ­ construct

48
New cards

Multiple-measure technique

One method of obtaining a more complete measure of a construct is to use two (or more) different procedures to measure the same variab

49
New cards

Range effect

the measurement procedure is insensitive to changes that may occur in one direction. In general, this type of sensitivity problem is called a -

50
New cards

Ceiling effect

clustering of scores at the high end of a measurement scale, allowing little or no possibility of increases in value

51
New cards

Floor effect

is the clustering of scores at the low end of a measurement scale, allowing little or no possibility of decreases in value.

52
New cards

Artifact

nonnatural feature accidentally introduced into something being observed.

53
New cards

Artifact

external factor that may influence or distort the measurements

54
New cards

Experimenter bias

occurs when the measurements obtained in a study are influenced by the experimenter’s expectations or personal beliefs regarding the outcome of the study.

55
New cards

Single-blind

A research study is - if the researcher does not know the predicted outcome.

56
New cards

Double-blind

A research study is - if both the researcher and the participants are unaware of the predicted outcome

57
New cards

Demand characteristics

refer to any of the potential cues or features of a study that (1) suggest to the participants what the purpose and hypothesis is and (2) influence the participants to respond or behave in a certain way.

58
New cards

Reactivity

occurs when participants modify their natural behavior in response to the fact that they are participating in a research study or the knowledge that they are being measured.

59
New cards

Good subject role

These participants have identified the hypothesis of the study and are trying to produce responses that support the investigator’s hypothesis.

60
New cards

Negativistic subject role

These participants have identified the hypothesis of the study and are trying to act contrary to the investigator’s hypothesis

61
New cards

Apprehensive subject role

These participants are overly concerned that their performance in the study will be used to evaluate their abilities or personal characteristic

62
New cards

Faithful subject role

These participants attempt to follow instructions to the letter and avoid acting on any suspicions they have about the purpose of the study.

63
New cards

laboratory

Reactivity is especially a problem in studies conducted in a -, where participants are fully aware that they are participants in a study.

64
New cards

Laboratory

is any setting that is obviously devoted to the discipline of ­ science.

It can be any room or any space that the subject or participant perceives as artificial.

65
New cards

Field

place that the participant or subject perceives as a natural environment