1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Strikes for Cause vs Peremptory Strikes
Strikes for cause allow attorneys to remove jurors with a valid legal reason (e.g., bias), while peremptory strikes enable attorneys to remove jurors without justification, though they cannot be used to discriminate based on race or gender
A legal objection raised when one party believes that the other has used peremptory strikes to exclude jurors based on race, violating Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
Aggravating Circumstance & Mitigating Circumstance
Aggravating factors (e.g., prior convictions, extreme cruelty) increase the severity of a sentence, whereas mitigating factors (e.g., mental illness, remorse) can reduce a sentence
The process of excluding potential jurors who are opposed to the death penalty in capital cases, ensuring that only those willing to impose the death penalty serve
Justifications for punishment include deterrence (preventing future crimes), retribution (punishing for wrongdoing), incapacitation (removing criminals from society), rehabilitation (reforming offenders), and restoration (repairing harm done)
Structured sentencing policies aimed at ensuring consistency in sentencing based on the severity of the crime and the defendant’s history. Federal guidelines exist, but states may vary in their approaches
Arguments for Elected Judges or Appointed Judges
Elected judges may be more accountable to the public but are susceptible to political pressures; appointed judges ensure legal expertise and independence but lack direct public accountability
The principle that anyone born in a country’s territory is automatically a citizen (jus soli), as established in the Fourteenth Amendment
Elements of procedural due process
Fundamental protections in legal proceedings, including notice of charges, the right to an attorney, the opportunity to present evidence, and an impartial tribunal