1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Buddha
Buddha’s name is Siddhartha Gautama and he is the founder of Buddhism. He taught the path to enlightenment through the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path. In the time period of 6th century BC.
Philosophies of life
The four noble truths: the universality of suffering.
The middle way: the way to satisfaction
The “not-self”: the root of selfishness
The eightfold path: the elimination of desire.
Meditation
Non-attachment is something that can happen from meditation.
Eastern philosophy
This is because eastern theology is not generally the result of divine revelation or religious dogma, but is often linked with matters of faith
Eastern philosophy is less concerned with the nature of the universe and more concerned about how to best organize a just society
It provides moral guidelines for the individual living within society
Hundred schools of thought were known as the philosophical teachings during 770-220 BCE.
Confucius
Chinese philosopher who had respect for ancestors, and ritual and was conservative. He was in the social class of the scholars that were advisors in courts achieving their status by merit not class. Confucius emphasized the moral cultivation of individuals, service to the state and leadership by ethical, educated men
The analects
The primary source of his teachings are in a book called the analects where his disciples wrote down his teachings. It is like a book on etiquette that was originally used as a rule book for a good government.
The virtuous life
kindness, loyalty, courtesy, wisdom
five constant relationships
Major teachings
Confucius believed that people should respect the family hierarchy
People should engage in good conduct outside the home to bring a good name to one’s family
People should show love, respect and support and be courteous to others
He also emphasized the role of rules and ritual to ensure universal order in society
He believed that man is a social being in a set of relationships and that men must educate and cultivate themselves so that their behavior would be on par with the moral order of society and the moral leaders who run it
Ideas about education
Confucius believed that the world became a better place if more people were educated because uneducated people only attended their base instincts, while educated people were more attuned to higher pursuits such as ethics and morality
To ensure more people could be educated, he reformed the system so that it was based more on merit than on wealth
Confucius had a strong desire to serve and empower others and believed that teaching was the best way to have a positive impact on people
Natural philosophers
No complete work survives from any of the pre-Socratic philosophers: we only have fragments of the originals, plus quotations and summaries that appear in the works of later writers
They were known as the Natural Philosophers because they explained the nature of reality without reference to supernatural forces
Issues of pre-socratics
The problem of the one and the many: explaining how one basic thing can be the source of many varied things. The world contains an enormous variety of objects, some living, others inanimate; some solid, others liquid. What was the common source?
The Problem of Change and Constancy: explaining how things remain constant as they change over time. Not only are there many kinds of things in the world, but each one is subject to change. Living things like trees grow old and die; inanimate objects like rocks weather away and change their form. As things go through changes, there’s still something about them that enables them to retain their identity.
Relativism: determining whether principles are absolute or created by people. Suppose that I arrive at an explanation of how the world operates. Is that explanation true just for me, or have I discovered something more universal that must be true for everyone? While some truths might appear to be independent of me, identifying those truths is a challenge.
Thales
6th century BCE: Thought of as the First Philosopher, or the Father of Philosophy
He was an astronomer and taught that the sun and stars were great spheres of fire
Studied Geometry + Astronomy
He was a natural philosopher
He was the first recorded to ask “what is everything made of?”
He believed that the basic substance was WATER – why is still not exactly known
Anaximander 610-540 BC
The first Greek to make astronomical and geographical charts
He believed that:
The universe was formed by the separation of opposites
The first human beings lived in the bellies of a fish and we cut our way out once we became self sufficient
That life began in the seas + planets had all once been fluid
He said that because all created things are limited, that which comes before and after them must be boundless
He disagreed with Thales – water is not the fundamental basis of reality
Anaximenes
570-526 BC: He believed that the various states of matter – gas, liquid, solid – were all varying degrees of condensation
He said that AIR was the one thing that was the basis of reality
He said that air was the source of water, earth, and fire
Heraclitus
540-480 BC: The problem he dealt with: Everything in the world is continually changing. Things grow then decay, are created then disintegrate. The most permanent things we see like mountains or stone monuments wear down with time. As things change, they exhibit opposing tendencies: “Cold things become warm, and what is warm cools; what is wet dries, and the dry is moistened.” Two things on a spectrum. We can only appreciate one because of the other. Hunger + Full
According to Heraclitus, there is a unifying plan that underlies the coherence of natural changes and harmonizes their opposing tendencies. He dubbed this the logos, the Greek word meaning “plan” or “formula” or “cosmic law”
He disagreed with Thales about the basic substance; he believed it was fire, not water
Fire is a more fundamental force or element than water because it is fire (i.e., in the sun, or in a forge) which transforms solids into liquids→ a force of change.
Fire, like everything else in the world, is in motion (i.e., in "flux").
Pythagoras
570-497 BCE: He may have been a disciple of Anaximenes
He had a genuine “love of wisdom” = Philosophy
He is best known for his Pythagorean Theorem
The “essence” of the number 4 - what is it? The “essence” of a right angle triangle
Number is the ruler of all forms
The first person to have the idea that all workings of the material universe are expressible in mathematical terms
He introduced the notion of the “square” and “cube” of a number
People saw him as a Messiah for his mathematical knowledge
Since his day, some of the great philosophers have also been great mathematicians
Descartes invented the graph and the subject of analytic geometry, Leibniz- Calculus
Anaxagoras
500-428 BC: He denied the possibility that everything we see in the natural world comes from one of the four elements (earth, air, fire, water)
He proposed the idea that everything in nature was built of an infinite number of invisible particles
He also said that all heavenly bodies are made of the same substance as earth and that there could be human life on other planets
Democritus
The fundamental idea that everything is made up of atoms that are too small to be seen, or even subdivided any further
Indestructible atoms, not created or broken apart
The word “atom” comes from the Greek words meaning “cannot be cut”
The beginnings of atomic physics →How they combine and interact explain different forms and types of matter.
No afterlife - atoms that make up your body leave to make other things once you die
“Never trust an atom, they make up everything!”
Parmenides
504-456 BCE: When something changes, what was not, is.
And what is, is not.
E.g., Green is, green is not. Red was not, but now red is.
But... "is not" is nothing. Therefore, change is impossible.
It is impossible for something to go "out of being," because "nothing" (non-being) is outside of being.
There is nothing to go into.
Hence, change is impossible.
In short, change is simply an illusion.
The principle of Parmenides is summarized as: "Being is. Non-being is not."
Zeno of Elea
490-430 BCE: He was a student of Parmenides
He devised clever paradoxes to show that motion of any kind or even the concept of change is impossible.
For example: Achilles and the Tortoise
If Achilles can run ten times faster than a tortoise, and the tortoise has a ten-yard lead at the outset, then when Achilles has run ten yards to catch up to the tortoise, it will have moved ahead one yard.
Each time Achilles reaches the position where the tortoise had been, the tortoise has moved ahead some small distance, so that Achilles will never catch up even though he is much faster.
Zeno was not disputing that we experience change in the course of our daily lives. Rather, he claimed that any attempt to explain change in motion would lead to contradictions.
Only the permanent and unchanging are real. The rest is an illusion we can ignore.
Sophists/sophistry
The term sophistry has come to signify the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning
Sophists were splendid orators, public speakers and mouths for hire
Completely ignorant of any morality or ethics, these charismatic men dazzled everyone with their clever reasoning, but usually fallacious arguments
will win an argument at any cost pretty much
plato and socrates oppose it bc they believe in the absolute truth
Protagoras
465-410 BC: He is the best-known Sophist
Protagoras was one of the most influential of the Sophists. He said that morals are nothing more than the social traditions of a society or group and that following local morals is the best way to live successfully and well in that place
He said “Man is the measure of all things”
There are no absolute norms to determine right or wrong
What is a social construct? Are morals necessary to live successfully in a society?
Moral relativity
Moral Relativity- There are no absolute norms to determine right or wrong, you have your morals and I have mine. Is there a problem with this type of thinking?
Sophist politics
Sophists were divided into two schools of thought
The first group followed the idea that nature was good and civilization was bad – that man is made equal in nature becoming unequal only by class-made institutions – that the law is an invention of the strong in order to subjugate the weak – they were supporters of DEMOCRACY
The second group followed the idea that nature is beyond good and evil – that by nature all men are unequal – (Socrates) believed society should be ruled by those who had the greatest ability, knowledge and virtue. ARISTOCRACY
Socrates was part of this second group
Socrates death
During the time of Socrates there is a lot of political turmoil between the various political parties
By 403 B.C. democracy is re-established in Athens
Socrates and the rebels launch a counterrevolution in order to bring down democracy and reinstate aristocracy
In 399 B.C. Socrates is sentenced to death by a democratic jury for corrupting the youth and for refusing to recognize the gods that were recognized by the state
Even still, he went on to influence nearly all the world for close to 2400 years!
The socratic method
Acting like u know nothing about a subject and asking lots of questions so that they can answer the questions and study better.
Socrates on happiness
Group 1: Pleasure (most people)
This group is in the majority; those in this group make choices that are directed ultimately towards pleasure as the chief good
Group 2: Fame & Status (others)
This group of people are willing to sacrifice pleasure for the sake of what they regard as the chief end, namely, honours, fame, or social status
Group 3: Wisdom and Knowledge
(smallest group)
This group who pursue neither honours, or social status or fame
They have made wisdom or knowledge the chief end
Socrates belonged to this group
wisdom knowledge and the soul
The highest good is the improvement of the soul
Do not be concerned with your bodies or your money, but first and foremost to care about the improvement of your soul. Not until you have pursued wisdom and truth ought you to think of money or fame or prestige or of your body. Virtue does not come from money, but from virtue comes money and every other good thing for mankind, public, and private.
virtue and the good life
To Socrates all these words represent what constitutes the right or good life
His view is known as rationalist moral philosophy
Rationalist Moral Philosophy claims that REASON is the dominant factor in moral conduct – to know the good is to do the good