ARREST – PACE 1984 CASES

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

5 Terms

1
New cards

Case: Christie v Leachinsky (1947)

Facts: Man arrested without being told why.

Legal Principle: A suspect must be informed of the reason for arrest at the time, or soon after.

2
New cards

Case: Rice v Connolly (1966)

Facts: Man refused to answer questions or identify himself.

Legal Principle: Refusal to cooperate isn’t an offence and doesn’t justify arrest.

3
New cards

Case: Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley (2004)

Facts: 10-year-old arrested at a protest; unclear reasons given.

Legal Principle: Arrest is unlawful unless the reason is explained in simple, clear terms.

4
New cards

what section does arrest fall under 

s24

5
New cards

what code does arrest fall under

code G