Patents

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/77

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

78 Terms

1
New cards

Issue Date

determines when patent is available to public

2
New cards

Filing Date

what prior art and references can be used to invalidate patent

3
New cards

Patent Disclosure Requirement

- claims must provide adequate disclosure

4
New cards

Patent Enablement Requirement

- Sufficient description to teach a PHOSITA in the art how to make and use the invention

5
New cards

Patent Description Requirement

- Sufficient description to show the possession (actually invented it) of the invention
- Prove to PHOSITA that one knew full context and implication of invention

6
New cards

Disclosure Requirement ensures that...

patents are issued to inventors that actually contribute fully to the development of knowledge

7
New cards

Utility Requirement ensures...

not only real invention, but in some cases that the patents are finished

8
New cards

Components of Patent Claims

- breaks invention down in major components
- trying to maximize overall amount of subject matter that patent can cover without including prior art

9
New cards

How to define claim terms

- what PHOSITA would understand that term to mean

10
New cards

Claims are

- independent
- Separately determined
- defines boundaries of invention

11
New cards

Only one claim...

needs to be violated to win case

12
New cards

Tuesday

day government issue documents about patents issued

13
New cards

What is within patent?

Title, Serial Number, Inventor & Assignee, Technology Fields, References Cited, Abstract, Drawings, Specification, Claims

14
New cards

Assignee

Company that patent is transferred to

15
New cards

Specification

- description of invention
- how it relates to prior arts
- improvements
- how to make and use
- best ways to use
- explain drawings

16
New cards

USPTO

- Alexandria
- part of US Department of Commerce
- Two tasks: review applications, review granted patents

17
New cards

Divergence between

amount of patents filed and granted

18
New cards

Pendency

time between filed and decision on patent (average 2 years)

19
New cards

Ex parte process

no opposition party, patent system is ex parte

20
New cards

how long can patent be private for

18 months

21
New cards

How to enforce

- find federal district court, file lawsuit
- Appeals to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

22
New cards

Private Litigation System

no one is tracking enforcement, patentee has to determine

23
New cards

Major Litigation Issues

- infringement, validity, damages

24
New cards

Life of Patent

Invention, application, patent issue, expiration

25
New cards

Patent Prosecution

The process of obtaining a patent which includes examination of the patent application by the PTO

26
New cards

Enforcement Phase

time when one can sue, have to pay maintenance fees

27
New cards

Patent value

- Negative cash value
- most have no cash value, small are very high value (pharmaceuticals)

28
New cards

Licensing Patents

Lending the right to make, use or sell your product for fee

29
New cards

Patent Prosecution Examinee Responses

- Office Actions (usually rejections)
- Interviews
- Notice of Allowance (met standard)
- Other Notices (clarification)
- Final Rejection

30
New cards

Standard for Patentability

- Fully and Appropriately Described
- Novel
- Nonobvious
- Work of the inventors
- Useful
- Within appropriate subject matter

31
New cards

How to evaluate Patentability

- Analyze the claim, determine whether claim meets the standards for patentability
- evaluate independently

32
New cards

PHOSITA

person having ordinary skill in the art

33
New cards

Disclosure should only teach...

what is new/needed to PHOSITA

34
New cards

Novelty Requirement

- must be new
- not identically described to public prior to patent filing date

35
New cards

Prior art

anything public before filing date

36
New cards

Nonobviousness Requirement

- nonovious means significant advancement over prior art according to PHOSITA
- "Ultimate Standard of Patentability"

37
New cards

What is Obvious

- varies by courts

- work of simple mechanic
- suggest by the problem to be solved
- widely known in other fields
- prompted by new technology

38
New cards

Inventorship Requirement

- Inventors must be human
- Inventor is joint owner of the patent
- all inventors must be listed on the patent, anyone who contributed to any claim

39
New cards

Inventorship ensures...

origin and ownership of the inventions is clear

40
New cards

Utility Requirement

- not scientifically implausible
- specific and substantial use

41
New cards

Scientifically Implausible Test

- does the invention violate laws of physics?
- rely on inherently flawed science

42
New cards

Subject Matter Exclusions

- Products of nature or natural phenomena
- Abstract Ideas

43
New cards

Products of Nature

- already exist in nature
- man-made versions of nature can be patented (genetically engineered plants or animals)

44
New cards

Abstract Ideas

- inventions that are too fundamental (i.e. math equation are too fundamental, describe things that already exist in the world)

45
New cards

Examples of too fundamental

- math
- well-known activities
- entirely mental steps

46
New cards

Why Abstract Ideas are excluded

- too broad
- balance of "public bargain" is needed

47
New cards

Patent Claims define...

- scope of the patented invention
- what is covered
- whether claim is valid

48
New cards

Claims Structure

- number
- preamble
- claim elements or limitations

49
New cards

Dependent Claims

must refer to a claim previously set forth and must further limit that claim

50
New cards

Interpreting Patent Claims

- Step 1: Dissect Claim into Parts
- Step 2: Open or Closed Claim?
- Step 3: Create a claim chart
- Step 4: Clarify any uncertain terms

51
New cards

Open claim

- Almost all patents are open claims, use the word "comprising" which means one would be infringement even if something is added

52
New cards

How does PHOSTIA define term

- variety of sources related to field, find "Ordinary Meaning"
- term in context of the specification
- expressed definitions within document

53
New cards

Cautions when determining Patent Coverage

- Title, abstract, drawings can be misleading

54
New cards

To determine patent coverage, always look at...

claims

55
New cards

Defense to infringement

- invalidity of patent is almost always used as defense

56
New cards

Pros of enforcing patent

- strengthens competitive position
- force licensing revenue
- strengthen technological position

57
New cards

Cons of enforcing patent

- High costs
- might lost the patent
- time consuming and distracting

58
New cards

Defendant Strategic Decision-Making

- very strong incentives to settle
- patent litigation often backwards (product was sold years ago)

59
New cards

Benefits of defendant winning

- invalidating a patent can change industry
- Avoiding infringement can establish technological roadmap

60
New cards

Approaches to enforcement

- win at all costs litigation
- licensing at fair levels

61
New cards

Statue of limitations

patent holders must file their infringement lawsuit within six years of the date of the alleged infringement in order to recover damages.

62
New cards

Acts of Patent Infringement

- Making
- Using
- Selling
- Offering to Sell
- Importing
- Filing
- ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application, filing generic drug)

63
New cards

Who chooses courts?

Patentee, can sue almost anywhere if large company

64
New cards

Patent Litigation Process

- Patentee files complaint
- Defendant Answers
- Discovery
- Trial
- Post-trial motions
- Appeal
- Judgment (injunction or finding non infringement)

65
New cards

Patent Infringement

- if an element is not within accused device, no infringement

66
New cards

Doctrine of Equivalents

in patent infringement law, if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, they are the same, even though they differ in name, form, or shape.

67
New cards

Issues with Doctrine of Equivalents

- very complex, difficult without litigation
- courts have tried to limit doctrine, patentees rarely win

68
New cards

How to Avoid Infringement

- eliminate claim elements on your product
- create non-equivalent substitutes

69
New cards

Designing Around

process of working around another patent, can result in improved design

70
New cards

Accidental Infringement

not a defense

71
New cards

Willful infringement

lead to triple damages

72
New cards

Remedies for Infringement

Injunction

Monetary Damages

73
New cards

Goal of remedies is to

put the patentee in the position she would have been without infringement

74
New cards

How damages are measured

- Lost Profits: profit of what a patentee would have made
- Reasonable Royalty: What the license agreement would have been

75
New cards

Lost Profits vs Reasonable Royalty

Lost profits result in higher awards, harder to prove

76
New cards

Length of Patent

20 years from time patent was filed, takes 2 years to finish patent process

77
New cards

What happens when patent expires?

Public Domain

78
New cards

Pharma Patent Strategy

Patent on early stage prospects, smaller companies don't know which will work but stake claim, patent strategy switches over to bigger companies in which they patent heavily on the prospects they think will work out