Final Review for COMM 120: Persuasion and Skepticism

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/41

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

42 Terms

1
New cards

Skepticism

Critical inquiry evaluating claims through evidence examination.

2
New cards

True Belief

Acceptance of claims without solid reasoning or evidence.

3
New cards

Cynicism

Fault-finding and ridiculing others' beliefs.

4
New cards

Probability Model

Framework assessing claims' likelihood, not certainty.

5
New cards

Possibility

Could happen, but not reliable for claims.

6
New cards

Plausibility

Logical case lacking substantial evidence.

7
New cards

Probability

Assessment of odds for a claim's truth.

8
New cards

Certainty

Claim without exception; absolute certainty discouraged.

9
New cards

Disconfirmation

Superficial explanations for contradictory evidence.

10
New cards

Burden of Proof

Obligation to present evidence supporting claims.

11
New cards

Biased Sources

Sources with extreme viewpoints affecting credibility.

12
New cards

Law of Truly Large Numbers

Large numbers imply anything can happen.

13
New cards

False Dichotomy

Fallacy presenting only two options in reality.

14
New cards

Ad populum

Persuasion based on popular belief rather than evidence.

15
New cards

Ad hominem

Attacking character instead of argument validity.

16
New cards

Non-sequitur

Conclusion not logically following premises.

17
New cards

Reductio ad absurdum

Argument showing opposite scenario as absurd.

18
New cards

Rationalization of Disconfirmation

Creating explanations to support a point despite contradictions.

19
New cards

Syllogism

Logical structure with major premise, minor premise, conclusion.

20
New cards

Collectivism

Emphasis on group harmony and cooperation.

21
New cards

Individualism

Focus on personal goals and self-expression.

22
New cards

Speaker-Audience Relationship

Connection emphasizing individual benefits in speeches.

23
New cards

Cultural Implications

Speech strategies vary between collectivist and individualist audiences.

24
New cards

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

Framework for processing persuasive messages through central and peripheral routes.

25
New cards

Central Route

Mindful processing of messages with credible evidence.

26
New cards

Peripheral Route

Mindless processing with little attention to message content.

27
New cards

Attitude-Behavior Consistency

Changing attitudes alone is insufficient; behavior must also change.

28
New cards

Direct Experience

Attitudes formed from direct experience align closely with behavior.

29
New cards

Social Pressure

Fear of disapproval complicates delivering controversial speeches.

30
New cards

Effort Required

High effort needed can lead to attitude-behavior inconsistency.

31
New cards

Social Judgement Theory

Attitude change occurs by comparing new messages to existing attitudes.

32
New cards

Latitude of Acceptance

Range of positions a person finds tolerable.

33
New cards

Latitude of Noncommitment

Positions that evoke neutral responses.

34
New cards

Latitude of Rejection

Positions deemed too far from a person's anchor attitude.

35
New cards

Pathos

Emotional appeals used to influence behavior.

36
New cards

Fear Appeals

Emotional strategies to invoke fear for persuasion.

37
New cards

Conditions for Fear Appeals

Audience must feel vulnerable and perceive recommendations as effective.

38
New cards

Anger Activism Model

Anger can motivate constructive behavior under specific conditions.

39
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance

Discomfort from holding inconsistent beliefs or behaviors.

40
New cards

Contrast Effect

Bigger requests are more accepted after larger initial requests.

41
New cards

Psychological Reactance

Resistance to perceived control or coercion.

42
New cards

Anger Activism Model (AMM)

Explains how anger and efficacy influence social movement participation.