1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Section 3 of CA 1982
Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House or of a Legislative Assembly and to be qualified for membership therein
It was very restrictive pre-confederation
Used to be 21+ vote, but now 18+
Expanded for women in 1918-1940
There were also ethnicity-based restrictions, like Indigenous peoples
Representation
Strive for representation by election of the people
Indirect choice of executive, limited direct democracy
Responsible gov’t - MPs are periodically re-elected (accountability) in order to remain in office
PM and Cabinet are indirectly accountable - must always maintain confidence
Delegates
Spokesperson who faithfully transmit views of the majority of the people who elect them
Three main concepts of representation
Delegates
Trustees
Party member
Trustee
Person that is entrusted to the responsibility of gov’t, use their judgment on behalf of constituents
Party member
Stay largely in line with collective policies of a party that people base their vote on. Loyal supporters of policies advocated by party.
Which of the three main concepts of representation do we use in Canada?
Hybrid
MPs act as a mix of trustees, delegates, and party members
MPs aren’t bound by specific mandates and use their judgment even if it differs from their constituents, so not just delegate
MPs are heavily influenced by party platforms, so not just trustee
While party discipline is strong, MPs have duty to their specific riding
There is no official model or consistent expectation, but may emphasize the leader
Mandate
The authority and legitimacy voters give a government to govern and implement its policies after winning an election
Governments like to claim these to govern based on that party platform
The idea of party representation forms the basis
If assumed that voters elected their MP based on party affiliation, then the party that is called on to form the gov’t may infer that the electorate has endorsed general line of policy
Party may claim that it has a “democratic ___” to carry out policy
if MPs were elected as delegates/trustees, there wouldn’t be this
Floor-Crossing
Joining another party, typically the opposite
Very controversial
Consistent with the trustee theory
Voters who elect MP have given authority to do what they think is of best interest for riding/country
Microcosm Theory of Representation
Legislative bodies are fully representative only if the assembly of a small system reflects the dynamics of society as a whole
I.e. if 50% of the population is female, then roughly half of the representatives ought to be female
Grounded in two arguments
Inclusivity as a requirement of fairness (i.e. if 5% of Chinese-Canadians make up the population, it would be unfair if legislative didn’t include some Chinese-Canadian reps)
Discrimination?
Legislative body needs to be inclusive of the wide variety of Canadians to ensure that their perspectives are heard and their interests can be defended/advanced
Always played a role in the regime
Increasingly influential in deciding who serves in the SCC
Also more discussion on reforming electoral system to have parliament mirror more closely of social composition
I.e. Charlottetown Accord → proposed 50% of seats would be reserved for women
May also be controversial because raises question of which groups should have defined representation and who would decide what politically relevant characteristics of society are?
Single-Member Plurality
An electoral system where the country is divided into constituencies (338 for Canada), each having one representative. The winning candidate is the one with the most votes
Canada’s current electoral system
Depending on # of candidates and strength of political parties in a particular riding, the winner will gain a majority of the votes
Often gain only plurality of the votes (win the most, but fall short of a majority)
Design of an Electoral System (Four questions):
Will the country be divided up into a # of electoral districts, or will the voters all vote in a single national election
What is the optimal # of representatives? Too few = not representative of population Too large = dysfunctional
If the electoral system is based on electoral districts, one has to ask if there will be one member elected per district or multiple-member districts
How is actual voting structured? Is it a plurality win or must the winner have a majority of the votes? Does the elector simply choose one candidate, or is it a ranking? Do they choose a desired party or a specific candidate?
Electoral Boundary Commissions
Process for determining specific boundaries of electoral districts
Provide parliament w/ set of recommendations
Each 3 person commission is chaired by a judge and commission members are usually high-profile citizens who are known for their impartiality and/or expertise in law/poli sci
Approved by parliament
Political gerrymandering?
Drawing boundaries to benefit political party, but in Canada it is more positive political gerrymandering
Efforts to try and improve representation for geographically concentrated interests, rather than partisan advantages
Sec. 3 improving voter equity → urban/rural balance
Community of Interest
Commissions must given consideration to ensure that a population will have a substantial enough presence to be heard.
Electoral Quotient
Average population for an electoral district
Last calculated average was 111, 166
Respect “one person, one vote”
Impossible to insist that every constituency is the same size
Unequal if it was (geographically speaking)
Larger territory to have same # of people in a small area in Toronto
Size may be too large for individual MP to represent effectively
Not uncommon to create districts w/ smaller populations in remote areas
Smaller provinces w guaranteed minimum of reps will necessarily have electoral districts that are below
Quantity of Reps
Determined by population
No provinces can have less MPs than senators, no matter how small the province is
Not a fixed total but a fixed floor (constitutional and legislative guarantees)
preserving ‘rep by pop’
General Election
Nation-wide elections, happens once GG dissolves parliament.
By-election
Held in a single constituency to fill a seat vacated midway through a Parliament by death/resignation of a MP.
Chief Electoral Officer
Politically neutral officers of Parliament that administer general elections. Runs Elections Canada. Cannot vote.
Returning Officers
Appointed by the chief electoral officer for each riding.
Plans and organizes the delivery of access to voting
Manages and controls financial, material and human resources
Administers the Canada Elections Act and the Referendum Act in his or her electoral district, as well as related legislation, such as the Official Languages Act and the Financial Administration Act
Communicates information to the public, candidates, political parties, field liaison officers and Elections Canada
Contributes to the improvement of the electoral process
Appoints deputy returning officer to run election at each poll
Can only vote on a tie
Polls
Electoral districts are divided into smaller units, has about 250 voters
Enumerators
Appointed by the returning officer, prepares official voters list for the poll.
Election Spending Regulation
Candidates must present returning officer with nomination papers signed by 100 voters from constituency if they want their name on ballot
Must also leave a deposit of $1000 with returning officer and is reimbursed later
Limits on the amount a candidate, party, third parties can spend
Donations made to political parties are limited to $1750 and only individuals can donate, not political parties
Elections Canada
An independent, non-partisan agency that reports directly to Parliament and oversees all national elections.
Third Party Spending
Not political parties but are interested in the election/outcome
Spending >$500 must register as a third party
Typically are interested in one particular issue/policy
Can’t spend more than $600,000 nationally or $5000 in any riding
Scrutineers
Two at each poll all day to observe process
Keep candidates posted on whether known supporters have voted
During closing, votes are counted by the deputy returning officer and scrutineers look on. Votes are officially counted by returning officer
Effects of SMP
Creates artificial majority gov’ts: rewards winners with more seats than it deserves
Handicaps smaller national parties: i.e. NDP and old PC party getting 2-% of vote but much less seat percentage
Increases regionalism: fostering growth of regional parties and therefore discourages national parties (i.e. BQ concentration in Quebec gives them an unfair advantage)
Magnifies regionalism: Highlights regional strengths and weaknesses of parties (i.e. Liberals and the West in 1980 got 20% of vote but only got 2 seats- 3%)
Proportional Representation (PR)
A family of electoral systems where each party’s seat share equals their vote as closely as possible (proportional). It exists in various forms: the party listen system (pure version) and mixed member proportional (MMP)
Party List System
Each voter casts a vote for a single party and each party is allocated seats based on its share of the vote. Seats are assigned to party-affiliated candidates on a party’s ranked electoral list.
Mixed-member proportional (MMP)
Some seats would be elected using party-list system (by party) and others by SMP (local candidate).
Alternative Vote/Preferential Ballot
Voters rank candidates in order of preference. There are various ways this concept can be implemented: majority run off election, ranked ballot, and single transferable vote.
Majority run-off
A candidate must win a majority (>50%) of the votes. If no one wins a majority, a runoff election is subsequently held with only two of the top candidates on the ballot
Preferential Ranked Ballot
Compressed run off. Voter ranks the candidates in order of preference rather than a single preference. When the votes are counter, if no candidate has a majority of first-place votes, then the second choices on the ballots of the lowest placed candidate are counter and added to the totals of those with the greater number of preference votes. Repeated until someone has a majority.
Single transferable Vote (STV)
Preferential voting combined with multi-member district system. Instead of electing just one MP in each single member riding (first past the post) voters elect a small team of MPs in a multi-member local district. They can rank in any order and across party lines.