Studied by 0 people
Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
DEFINITION OF JUDICIAL NEUTRALITY
The principle that judges shouldn’t be influenced by other branches of gov, particularly executive.
BASIS OF LAW
All decisions must be made based on the law and judges must be able to explain how they came to their conclusion. They write their formal opinion and announce it, showing how they made their decision based on law instead of any personal opinions or sense of justice.
WHY IS BASIS OF LAW IMPORTANT
It avoids bias or personal opinion and is based on key facts of the law
PEER REVIEW
Cases in the supreme court are heard by groups of at least 5 judges to ensure that no single personal prejudice influences the final decision. When a case concerns aspects covered by the European convention on human rights, the decision may be referred to the European Court of Human Rights for review.
WHY IS PEER REVIEW IMPORTANT
Prejudice and action on behalf of personal belief is prevented as multiple individuals listen to the cases.
GROUP MEMBERSHIP
No serving justice is allowed to join a political party or certain other groups that could cause a conflict of interest. Justices can still vote and have personal views but they cannot be formally linked to a political organisation. They must declare if they have conflict of interest with a certain case that could impact their neutrality.
WHY IS GROUP MEMBERSHIP IMPORTANT
Personal views must be established preventing bias and negative impact on neutrality.
TRAINING AND EXPERTISE
All senior judges must have had a lengthy career as a lawyer and be highly trained. They are familiar with the principle that cases must be judged based on law. The justices of the supreme court are the most highly regarded and best qualified legal minds in the UK.
WHY IS TRAINING AND EXPERTISE IMPORTANT
Expertise guarantees knowledge and true understanding of the process
