1/88
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Criminology background info
Urban poor became a target of new laws that emerged to deal with some of the behaviours associated with these populations
New laws being created around prostitution and sex work, public intoxications, etc.
Behaviours morally agaisnt fabric of society at this time
Demographics
Statistical data that relates to the characteristic of a population or different characteristics of a population.
Data about the size of different age groups, gender balances, any kind of measurable information that will describe the population.
Baby Boom 1960s
1960s population of young males in Canada and the United States and the UK increased dramatically.
Historically young men actually committed disproportionate amount of crime. So ages 15 to 24 in general are the most crime prone years for populations.
we see rising crime rates that met this population coming of age.
Correlation
Finding that two measurable phenomena occur together. Two different phenomena have a relationship. We don't know the nature of this relationship. If it's wanted direct cause and effect.
Demographic x coorelation
Demographic shift in terms of the baby boom was correlated with rising crime rates.
1960s and 1970s social and political upheaval
Entire shifts in the nuclear family. women going into the workforce doubled during the 1960s and 70s
invention of the birth control pill and the more widespread accessibility
Greater acceptance of divorce and increases in divorce rates,
Increases in use of different substances and alcohol consumption at the time.
*increase of crime, led to development of criminology
What is crime?
An act punishable by law
“An act or omission that violates the criminal law and is punishable with a jail term, a fine and/or some other sanction
Legal (value consensus/normative position) (legal position)
What is a crime is agreed upon
Needs to be a law
What is Sociology?
The intersection of biography and history
Critical analysis of the different types of social memberships, connections and institutions that constitue society across place and time
Studies social structures and institutions
Sociological Imagination
C Wright Mills: developping our sociological imagination is about learning to connect the personal problems we all experience to broader social structures
The vivid awareness of the relationship between experience and the wider society
Ex. Unemployment, individual trouble but broader social issue connected to things like job market, education, etc.
Social constructionism
knowledge and meaning are developed through social processes and interactions
Defitions of social phenomena (e.g crime; masculinty and feminity) vary:
From culture to culture
In any one culture over historical time
Over the course of a person’s life
Within any one culture at any time
What is Criminology?
Study of crime and criminal behaviour
The body of knowledge regarding crime as a social phenomenon. Includes the processes of..
Making laws
Breaking laws
Reacting to the breaking of laws
Looking at what to criminalize, how we respond to crime, what does evidence tell us about responses to crime and their effectiveness, can studying crime help us respond to emerging challenges
Criminology as an interdisciplinary social science
Draws on sociology, pyschology, biology, law, geography, economics
Includes study of law, history of law, criminalization process, crime prevention and crime control, policing, corrections and penology
Sociological approaches to criminology
Focus on social order and social forces
Examine how social condtions can influence our laws and our crime rates, importance of history to this understanding
Interested in what social and structural changes might be made in order to effectively respond to challenges that crime presents
What criminologists study?
Criminology: causes and theories of crime, its extent and effects on individuals and society
Criminal justice: made up of institutions (police, courts, corrections) and related processes that enforce society’s laws
Deviance: study of behaviour and how it relates to social nroms; some deviant behaviours deemed by society to be criminal in nature, others not
6 Major Areas of Criminology
Definition of crime and criminals
Origins and role of law
Social distribution of crime
Causation of crime
Patterns of criminal behaviour
Societal reactions to crime
Criminalization w. stigmitization
how certain behaviours become criminalized or de-crimialized over time
Relationship between criminalization and stigmatization (strongly dissaproving of person or behaviour)
Ex. Immigrant populations, mental illness
Understanding from stigma what becomes criminalized
Deviance
behaviours that differ from accepted social norms (criminal or non criminal acts)
Geographic Profiling
tool permitting police officers to focus on the likely residence of offenders in cases of serial crimes
Net Widening
imposing a form of control on individuals who might not be subject to such control ex. (electronic monitoring)
Brief History of Crime and Justice Media
Pre-media, sound media, visual media and new media
Developed from theather/urban legends to pamphelts, commerical film, comics, TV, arcade/video games, computers, virtual reality/news
Narrowcasting
Messages go to smaller interest groups, specializied groups and narrow audiences
On-demand nature
Access on demand way, controlled by consumer
Interactivity
Active participant, not passive (co-producers)
4 Types of Content
Advertising
News
Infotainment (news magazines, reality shows, media trials)
Entertainment
Power of Mass Media C. Wright Mills
Media acts as a gatekeeper (control what’s presented)
Material must travel through a series of checkpoints (or gates) before reaching the public.
A select few decide what images to bring to a broad audience
C. Wright Mills: the real power of the media is that they can control what is being presented
Crime Waves
definition and consequences, increasing reporting leads to increased awareness (public attention)
Analyzing media content Qual vs. Quant
Quantitative: counting, what it selected, (how many times certain things are used)
Manifest content: visible, surface
Qualitative: what it made salient, (context or messaging conveyed)
Latent content: deeper, symbolic
Media Effects
The concept that exposure to media has an effect of behavior ex. (young people exposed to violent media will behave aggressively
Assumptions and limitations (common sense view that whatever we watch we’ll react, one way relationship, doesn’t account for critical thought
Crime Comics
Section 163 of the Criminal Code (crime comics were illegal) (illegal to print sell or publish a crime comic)
Believed link between crime comics and psychopathology in young people (corrupted morals)
Mutual shaping of media, law and public attitudes about crime
Cultural Criminology
Subdiscipline of criminology that explores link between culture, crime and crime control in contemporary social life
Explores cultural meaning of media and violence and emphasizes significance of active audiences
Active Audience
The concept that audiences are not passive recipients of information or meanings but are instead active in the process of creating meaning.
Media Framing
Select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more prominent in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation for the item described
Entman, 1993: How the media report on a given defines problems, diagnoses causes, makes moral judgements and suggests remedies
Problem Frame
A narrative that is easily understood because it focuses on the existence of something extraordinary and “bad” that affects many people, and identifies unambiguous solutions that can be implemented in the future
Moral Panic
Phenomena—socially constructed by the media, politicians, and “moral entrepreneurs’ —in which certain people or groups are labelled or stigmatized as the cause of a perceived social problem, resulting in widespread public alarm
ideology
linked set of ideas and beliefs that act to uphold and justify an existing arrangement of power, authority, wealth, and status in society
Discourse
forms of language, representation and practices and how meaning is created and shared within specific cultural and historical contexts
moral entrepreneurs
•A person, group, or organization that takes the lead in identifying certain behaviours as deviant and in need of legal sanctions
“These members of society make the rules that define what is deviant and create criminal “outsiders””
Primary vs. Secondary Deviance
Primary Deviance: individual or group engages in a disapproved behavior without seeing that behavior as deviant or criminal
Secondary Deviance: Results from societal reaction to deviance (stigmitizationa nd control) leading them to see themselves as deviant or criminal
Folk Devils
Originating in images from folklore, this term refers to people or groups presented in media as deviant outsiders and the cause of social problems.
Goode and Ben-Yehuda (1994) Criteria for distinguishing moral panics:
Concern (of problem)
Hostility (towards a group)
Consensus (members that pose a threat)
Disproportionality (level of concern disproportionate to level of threat)
Volatility (appears or disappears as a threat, no explanation to why it was a big problem then faded)
Three theoretical models to explain why moral panics emerge:
1.Grassroots (genuine public concern, ex. mob)
2.Elite engineered (small/elite powerful groups set up to create moral panic)
3.Interest groups (media politicians, etc. act independently with a fear of social problem (ex. Stranger danger, arising from diff child protection organizations)
The Ideal Victim
A person or a category of individuals who, when hit by crime, most readily are given the complete and legitimate status of being a victim
No “they had it coming”, make most favorable media coverage, white women, seen as needing protection
6 Ideal Victim Criteria:
Weak in relation to the offender: either female, sick, very old, very young, or a combination thereof.
Going about routine, respectable, and legitimate (read as “legal”) daily activities when she or he is victimized.
Blameless for what transpired.
Unrelated to and unacquainted with the person who committed the offence.
In a submissive or subordinate position to the perpetrator, who can easily be described in negative terms.
Someone with enough influence, power, or sympa- thy to assert “victim status” without threatening the broader political status quo.
Representation of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls
Canadian news coverage revealed less coverage, not on front page
More detached in tone, less in detail than white women
Contributes to broader societal inequalities
Calls to action, they are worthy victims
“The Bad Guys”: Race, Othering, and Crime
Black people portrayed as violent
Relying on good/bad guys, seen as more dangerous
Stereotyping, relying on binaries
Strips people of identity
Removes positive attributes
Substantive Law
Concerned with rights and obligations
Criminal Law
violations of public order, well-being safety (guilt vs. Innocence proven by crown)
Sentences ranges from discharge to life in prison with no chance of parole, probition, etc.
Most common is probation, supervision of probation
Second common is imprisonment (6 months or a moth)
Sentence of less than 2 years vs more is federal correctional institutions
Third common is fines less than 1000$
Death penalty has been abolished in Canada
Civil Law
infringement of contract, between people (divorce, will) plaintiff and defendant
Criminal Law,A body of jurisprudence that includes:
The definition of various crimes (crime)
The specification of various penalties (consequence)
A set of general principles concerning criminal responsibility (evidence)
A series of defenses to a criminal charge (defenses)
*Required to enforce laws regardless of political views
The Crown
individual who represents attorney general e.g prosecutor
Common Law
A body of law defined primarily through successive decisions of judges, as opposed to through legislation.
Deterrence
A principle of sentencing or punishment intended to discourage citizens from offending or reoffending.
Specific Deterrence (individual deterred as a result of conviction)
General Deterrence (general public deterred from seeing people convicted)
**looks forward
Denunciation
A formal expression that conduct is unacceptable. (socially wrong) publicly expressed to draw attention
*focuses on society’s values
Retribution
Punishment for transgressions. (pay for their behaviour) *looks backwards
Federal Legislation sources
Constitution Act, 1867
The criminal code of Canda – first passed 1892
Defines criminal acts and the legal elements that must be present for a conviction (substantive criminal law)
Specifies the criminal procedures to be followed in prosecuting a case and the powers of criminal justice systems officials (procedural law)
Regulatory Legislation
True crime offences vs quasi-criminal offences
Orderly legislation of legitimate offences
Legislation over health, fishing, etc.
Keep food safe, storage tanks for dangerous products
3 types of offences:
Summary offences: less serious, theft under 500$/misdemeanor
Hybrid Offences : majority, decides if summary or indictable.
Indictable offences : serious, felonies, murder, assault, preliminary hearing
Judge-Made Criminal Law
Second major source of criminal law:
Judicial decisions that interpret criminal legislation or expound the common law
Common Law
Laws that evolve in areas not covered by legislation, taken from past
Judges interpret criminal law
In canada, judges cannot create new common-law cirmes
However, the develop common-law defences that are not dealt with by legislation
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Criminal Law
Principle of the rule of law (everyone must follow, restrains government overstep)
Empower judges to deem laws as invalid (e.g abortion)
Restricts power of the state and protects rights of individuals
Limits on rights (free expression, exception of harmful ex. Shouting fire in a theatre)
Hate speech
Structure of the Canadian Criminal Courts
Supreme court
Provincial court of appeal
Superior trial court'
Provincial / territorial trial court
Provincial and Superior courts cover majority
Superior deal with most serious, slightly fever
Supreme court has fewest number
The Criminal Justice Process (6 stages)
Stage 1: Crime reported to/observed by police, police investigate and gather evidence (OPP) or use RCMP for municipal level of policing
Stage 2: Police provide report to Crown counsel who decides whether to move forward (in public interest or not, press chargers or not)
Stage 3: swearing of an information before a justice of the peace in Provincial Court who decides whether to order a charge (police says crime has been committed)
Stage 4: accused arrested or issued with summons to appear in court
Stage 5: indictment --> preliminary hearing in Provincial Court,
Summary conviction offence --> straight to Provincial Court
Stage 6: Trial in superior court, trial in Provincial Court (judge, or judge and jury)
The elements of a crime needed to prove a crime: 1. Mens rea
The mental element of a criminal offence or the state(s) of mind of the offender; it is the intent to commit a criminal act. (state of mind)
The elements of a crime needed to prove a crime: 2. Actus reus
The criminal act or personal conduct relating to a crime; it may include a failure to act but does not include the mental element of a criminal offence. (hitting someone)
The Actus Reus Elements of a Crime
3 components
Conduct: act or omission, must be voluntary
Circumstances
Consequences: of conduct
Subjective and Objective Mens Rea
Subjective:
The accused intended to bring about consequences prohibited by law
The forms of subjective mens rea are: intention and knowledge; recklessness; and willful blindness
Ex. Briscoe 2010 case, sexual assault and killing
Objective:
A reasonable person would have appreciated that their conduct created a risk of harm and would have taken action to avoid the actus reus elements of the crime
Becoming a Party to a Criminal Offence
Individuals need not commit an offence to be convicted
CCC section 21 (1): anyone is a party to a crime who
Actually commits it,
Aids another person to commit it,
Abets (encourages) any person to commit it
Inchoate Offences
Inchoate crime: when a person attempts to bring about a crime but it unsuccessful in doing so
Three types of Criminal Code inchoate offences:
1. Counselling: procuring, soliciting or inciting another to commit a crime
2. Criminal attempt: an individual does or omits to do antything for the purpose of carrying out a previously formed intention to commit a crime
3. Conspiracy: An agreement by two or more persons to commit a criminal offence
Partial defenses:
Crown failed to establish an offence, no criminal liability (alibi) could not have voluntary done it, Mistake of fact (unaware of crime), casting doubt on actus reus or mens rea
True defenses:
self defense, mental disorder MCRMD, lack capacity to see crime
Common Law defenses:
crafted by court, admit to commiting crime but did so under harm (held at gun point), commited one but small compared to what would have happened if they didn’t commit it
Criminal Justice Statistics
Three broad types:
Stats about crime and criminals
Stats about criminal justice system and its response to crime
Stats about perceptions of crime and criminal justice
Controversies over Counting Crime
Coverage: How can we obtain reliable and valid data on the scope and nature of the crime
Reliability: How consistent are the results?
Validity: Does the tool actually measure crime?
Methodology: Do the methods used to count crime hold up under critical analysis?
To change records into usable stats we need to consider methodological issues:
Units of count – what is being counted
Level of aggregation – how to combine data
Definitions – how to define what is being counted
Data element – what info is to be collected
Counting procedure – how to count units and elements
Three dominant ways to count crime or describe crime patterns and trends:
Official (police-reported) statistics
Victimization surveys
Self-report studies
The Uniform Crime Report
Introduced in 1962
Intended to standardize (make the same) the collection and assembly of police-reported crime and statistics from across Canada
UCR 1 and UCR 2 (summary data vs. detailed info on each incident)
The UCR and Crime rate
UCR collects data presented as crime rate
Crime rate is criminal incidents per every 1000 canadians
What crime rate allows
Seriousness rule (most serious one counted)
UCR and crime rate concerns
underreporting and incomplete data collection
Doesn't always align with public perceptions of crime
Tell us more of police, what they see as serious
The Crime Funnel
Undetcted/unreported crime (large)
Detected but unreported crime (medium)
Reported crime (small)
Large amount of crime unknown or for some reasons not reported
What is recorded becomes UCR data
The Dark Figure of Crime
Crime that is unreported/unrecorded
e.g iceberg (tip of iceberg is reported everything underneath is unreported)
Personal reasons for not-reporting for example sexual assaults
Feel crimes aren’t important
Police can’t help or deal with crime in another manner
Crime Severity Index of the UCR
CSI addresses the matter of the crime rate being driven by high volumes of less serious offences
CSI is calculated by assigning each offence a weight derived from sentences given by the criminal courts
The more serious the average sentence, the greater the weight
Thus, more serious offences have a greater impact on the severity index
Police-reported crime rates Canada 1962-2024
General trends:
Crime had a steady increase till 1990s then decreases, same for property crimes
Violent crimes are low, small increase in 1990s, pretty flat
Police-reported crime severity indexes, Canada, From 1998-2024
Crime severity index decreases a lot
Violent CSI flat and decreases in 2014, increasing then in last few years
In pandemic years, drop in violent crime
2014-2021 increase in violent CSI
Police-Reported Crime in Canada 2024
Non-violent crime decreases in 2024, varies from public awareness or policing practices
Small increases in violent
The General Social Survey on Victimization + Limitations
Asks Canadians on their experiences with 8 types of offences: sexual assault, robbery, physical assault, theft of personal property, household victimization, break and enter, theft of motor vehicle or parts, theft of household property, vandalism
Limitations: some criminal acts aren’t captured, or consensual crime (sex-work, assisted suicide, etc), lack validity
The Construction of Crime Stats via Victimization Surveys
A criminal event occurs
Crime involves a victim
Victim is interviewed
Event is recalled
Event is labelled as a crime
Decision to tell interviewer
A victim statistic
Distortion in GSS measurements
Sampling (misses youth under 15, homeless, prisoners)
Victim disclosure (might not, not feel safe)
Telescoping (unintentionally remembering things sooner than they were, false positives)
Memory fade (forgetting incidents, false negatives)
Self-Report Studies
Distribution of questionnaire to a sample of people, asks if they have committed a crime in a particular period of time (specific population)
Strengths: ask direct source, able to ask people what they do, research and theory contribution, people are willing to produce valid responses for petty crimes (less deviant)
Limitations: difficult to survey chronic offenders
Zombie Laws
statutes that have been ruled unconstitutional or are no longer enforceable but remain on the books, posing potential risks for future legal interpretations.
The federal government is moving to clean up Canada's Criminal Code by stripping so-called "zombie laws" from the books:
Spreading false news.
Fraudulently pretending to practise witchcraft.
Water-skiing at night.
Vagrancy.
Procuring miscarriage (abortion).
Duelling.
Crime comics.
Issuing trading stamps.