Social Groups: Race

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/49

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

50 Terms

1
New cards

What is ingroup love?

A tendency to evaluate and prefer one's own group positively, even without hostility toward others.

2
New cards

What is outgroup hate?

Negative evaluation or dislike of people from groups other than one’s own.

3
New cards

Definition: Ingroup love?

Positive evaluation of one's own group, arising even without negative attitudes toward others.

4
New cards

Example: Ingroup love?

Preferring classmates from your own team during a group project.

5
New cards

Definition: Outgroup hate?

Negative evaluation of groups other than one’s own.

6
New cards

Example: Outgroup hate?

Refusing to play with another group because you believe they are ‘bad.’

7
New cards

What does anticipation of future cooperation do to minimal group bias?

It eliminates minimal ingroup bias in both children and adults (Misch et al., 2021).

8
New cards

Definition: Minimal group bias?

Preference for one’s assigned group even when groups are arbitrary.

9
New cards

Example: Minimal group bias?

Children prefer those labeled with the same color even when groups are random.

10
New cards

What happened in the control condition of the cooperation study?

The connection with the ingroup failed.

11
New cards

What happened in the experimental condition of the cooperation study?

The connection with the outgroup failed.

12
New cards

Core learning goal about racial bias?

Understand how racial bias develops and how to intervene to reduce it.

13
New cards

Definition: Stereotyping?

A cognitive process of assigning traits to individuals based on group membership.

14
New cards

Example: Stereotyping?

Thinking 'Asians are good at math.'

15
New cards

Stereotyping process?

Group → Belief about traits → Applied to individuals

16
New cards

Definition: Prejudice?

An affective, usually negative, attitude toward a group and its members.

17
New cards

Example: Prejudice?

Feeling discomfort or dislike toward immigrants.

18
New cards

Prejudice process?

Group → Emotion → Behavior tendency

19
New cards

Definition: Discrimination?

Behavioral expression of prejudice; acting unfairly toward group members.

20
New cards

Example: Discrimination?

Refusing to hire someone because of their race.

21
New cards

Discrimination process?

Prejudice → Behavior → Outcomes

22
New cards

What is ingroup bias?

Favoring one’s own group over outgroups.

23
New cards

Definition: Ingroup bias?

Preference for members of one’s own group without necessary hostility toward others.

24
New cards

Example: Ingroup bias?

Choosing to sit with students from your club.

25
New cards

What did Raabe & Beelmann’s meta-analysis find?

Prejudice is low in early childhood, peaks in middle childhood, and declines in adolescence.

26
New cards

Alternative explanation for apparent racial bias?

It might reflect general ingroup bias, not true prejudice.

27
New cards

Factors influencing group preferences?

Group size, familiarity, and perceived social status.

28
New cards

Key question from South African research?

Group size, familiarity, and perceived social status.

29
New cards

South African finding: Black children?

Did not show own-race preference.

30
New cards

South African finding: gender?

All children preferred their own gender.

31
New cards

Finding about status?

Children favored groups associated with higher social status.

32
New cards

Rizzo et al. finding on playmate choice?

White children preferred White peers and least often chose Black peers.

33
New cards

Average choice rate: Black peers?

~0.18, significantly below chance.

34
New cards

Average choice rate: Latino/a peers?

~0.19, below chance.

35
New cards

Average choice rate: Asian peers?

~0.24, at chance.

36
New cards

Average choice rate: White peers?

~0.39, above chance.

37
New cards

What did not explain anti-Black bias?

Age, familiarity, income, demographics, or parental politics.

38
New cards

Main takeaway from Rizzo et al.?

Pro-White and anti-Black preferences are robust and unexplained by measured factors.

39
New cards

Intervention tested by Perry et al.?

Guided parent–child conversations about racism.

40
New cards

Effect of guided conversations?

They reduced pro-White implicit bias in children and parents.

41
New cards

What predicted stronger reduction in bias?

Color-conscious messages.

42
New cards

What predicted smaller reduction in bias?

Colorblind ideology and external attributions.

43
New cards

Definition: Color-conscious messages?

Messages acknowledging racism, naming bias, or linking events to systemic racism.

44
New cards

Example: Color-conscious messages?

'What happened was unfair because it treated the child differently due to race.'

45
New cards

Definition: Colorblind messages?

Messages denying or minimizing the role of race.

46
New cards

Example: Colorblind messages?

'Skin color doesn’t matter; maybe it was just a misunderstanding.'

47
New cards

Definition: External attributions?

Blaming prejudiced behavior on external influences like parents, media, or environment.

48
New cards

Example: External attributions?

'He acted that way because he learned it from TV.'

49
New cards

Development of prejudice?

Age → Prejudice trend (low → peak → decline)

50
New cards

Status influence on preference?

Perceived status → Preference strength