CRJS 4013 Lectures 6+

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

77 Terms

1
New cards

DISCLOSURE

The legal obligation of the Crown to provide the defence with all relevant evidence before trial to ensure a fair process

2
New cards

DISCOVERY

The civil litigation process where parties examine each other’s evidence prior to trial

3
New cards

ADVERSARIAL SYSTEM

A trial structure where opposing parties present their cases and the judge or jury decides based on the evidence

4
New cards

INCULPATORY EVIDENCE

Evidence that tends to prove the guilt of the accused

5
New cards

EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE

Evidence that tends to support the innocence of the accused or raise reasonable doubt

6
New cards

FULL ANSWER AND DEFENCE

A principle of fundamental justice under section 7 of the Charter allowing the accused to know and respond to the case against them

7
New cards

R V STINCHCOMBE (1991)

The Supreme Court case establishing the Crown’s duty to disclose all relevant evidence whether helpful or harmful to its case

8
New cards

LEGAL PRIVILEGE

A rule protecting certain information from disclosure where important legal interests outweigh disclosure

9
New cards

ONGOING DISCLOSURE

The continuing duty of the Crown to disclose new relevant evidence as it arises

10
New cards

POLICE NOTES

Written records created by police officers that must be disclosed to the defence

11
New cards

WITNESS STATEMENTS

Recorded accounts of events provided by witnesses that form part of Crown disclosure

12
New cards

PRELIMINARY INQUIRY

A court proceeding used to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to commit the accused to trial

13
New cards

REASONABLE JURY TEST

The test asking whether a properly instructed jury could reasonably convict based on the evidence

14
New cards

CREDIBILITY

The assessment of a witness’s honesty and truthfulness

15
New cards

RELIABILITY

The assessment of a witness’s ability to accurately perceive remember and recount events

16
New cards

DIRECT INDICTMENT

A procedure allowing the Attorney General to send an accused directly to trial without a preliminary inquiry

17
New cards

RULES OF EVIDENCE

Legal principles governing what information may be admitted or excluded at trial to ensure fairness and reliability

18
New cards

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

Any admissible information presented to prove or disprove facts in a criminal proceeding

19
New cards

BURDEN OF PROOF

The obligation on a party to prove a fact or issue to a specific legal standard

20
New cards

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The highest standard of proof requiring near certainty of guilt

21
New cards

ACTUS REUS

The physical or external elements of a criminal offence

22
New cards

MENS REA

The mental element required to establish criminal liability

23
New cards

DIRECT EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact without the need for inference

24
New cards

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that requires inference to connect it to a conclusion of guilt

25
New cards

HODGE RULE

A rule requiring circumstantial evidence to exclude all rational alternatives except guilt

26
New cards

PROBATIVE VALUE

The extent to which evidence logically supports a fact in issue

27
New cards

VOIR DIRE

A hearing held to determine the admissibility of evidence

28
New cards

REAL EVIDENCE

Physical objects connected to the offence

29
New cards

DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE

Evidence that visually or audibly demonstrates facts such as photos or recordings

30
New cards

ILLUSTRATIVE EVIDENCE

Evidence used to help explain testimony but not evidence on its own

31
New cards

TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE

Oral evidence given by witnesses under oath

32
New cards

HEARSAY

Evidence of an out of court statement offered for the truth of its contents

33
New cards

PRINCIPLED EXCEPTION

An exception allowing hearsay where necessity and reliability are established

34
New cards

THEORY OF THE CASE

A coherent narrative explaining how the evidence supports a party’s position

35
New cards

TRIAL PREPARATION

The strategic planning of evidence witnesses and arguments before trial

36
New cards

TRIAL BOOK

A structured binder organizing the sequence of trial materials

37
New cards

BOOK OF AUTHORITIES

A collection of statutes and case law relied upon by counsel

38
New cards

JURY TRIAL

A trial conducted before a judge and jury for indictable offences

39
New cards

JUDGE ALONE TRIAL

A trial where the judge acts as the sole trier of fact

40
New cards

OPENING STATEMENT

An outline of the case presented at the start of trial

41
New cards

CROWN CASE

The presentation of evidence by the prosecution

42
New cards

DEFENCE CASE

The optional presentation of evidence by the accused

43
New cards

DIRECTED VERDICT

A request for acquittal where the Crown has presented no evidence capable of supporting a conviction

44
New cards

CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE

A process used to exclude biased or unqualified jurors

45
New cards

JURY CHARGE

Instructions given by the judge to guide jury deliberations

46
New cards

VERDICT

The final decision on guilt or innocence

47
New cards

SUMMARY CONVICTION

A streamlined criminal process for less serious offences

48
New cards

LIMITATION PERIOD

A time limit within which charges must be laid for summary offences

49
New cards

CRIMINAL PRESUMPTIONS

Legal reasoning tools that guide how facts may be inferred but are not evidence

50
New cards

R V OAKES

A Supreme Court case outlining how presumptions interact with Charter rights

51
New cards

REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION

A presumption that can be displaced by evidence

52
New cards

IRREBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION

A presumption that cannot be challenged once established

53
New cards

PRESUMPTION OF LAW

A presumption created by statute or legal doctrine

54
New cards

PRESUMPTION OF FACT

An inference drawn from proven facts

55
New cards

BASIC FACT

A fact that must be proven before a presumption arises

56
New cards

EVIDENTIARY BURDEN

The obligation to raise evidence on an issue

57
New cards

BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES

A standard requiring that something is more likely than not

58
New cards

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

A Charter protected principle requiring the Crown to prove guilt

59
New cards

COMMON LAW PRESUMPTIONS

Presumptions developed through judicial decisions

60
New cards

RECENT POSSESSION

An inference of guilt drawn from possession of recently stolen property

61
New cards

DE MINIMIS

A principle excluding trivial matters from criminal liability

62
New cards

NCRMD

A verdict finding the accused not criminally responsible due to mental disorder

63
New cards

SECTION 16 CRIMINAL CODE

The statutory provision governing the NCRMD defence

64
New cards

MENTAL DISORDER

A disease of the mind recognized by law

65
New cards

EXPERT EVIDENCE

Specialized opinion testimony used to assist the court

66
New cards

BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES STANDARD

The standard used to prove NCRMD

67
New cards

REVIEW BOARD

A tribunal overseeing the disposition of NCRMD accused

68
New cards

ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE

A release without conditions or criminal responsibility

69
New cards

CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE

A release subject to compliance with conditions

70
New cards

DETENTION IN HOSPITAL

A custodial disposition for NCRMD accused

71
New cards

SENTENCING

The process of determining punishment after conviction

72
New cards

PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE

The requirement that punishment reflect offence gravity and blameworthiness

73
New cards

SECTION 718 OBJECTIVES

The statutory purposes of sentencing

74
New cards

AGGRAVATING FACTORS

Circumstances increasing sentence severity

75
New cards

MITIGATING FACTORS

Circumstances reducing sentence severity

76
New cards

GLADUE PRINCIPLES

Sentencing considerations specific to Indigenous offenders

77
New cards

APPEAL

A request for review of a trial decision by a higher court