1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Where do planners get the power to plan?
US Constitution 10th Amendment “reserved powers doctrine” & State Constitution (Article 11, Sec. 7)
What does the “Reserved Powers Doctrine” do for us?
When the government is silent on a topic and doesn’t claim power then the power is then granted to the state
What does the State Constitution do for us?
The land use power goes to the cities and counties
What are the 3 types of jurisdiction in CA?
Special Districts (Specific Function), Cities and Counties (General Purpose)
What can the Cities and Counties do?
Regulatory Power - create laws on how the city operates and say how land is used (Regulations)
What are Special Districts?
A public or private institution (ex. school, water, flight control, etc.)
How are Counties and Cities established?
Counties - Established by the state
Cities - Established by residents who want something
Where does the Land Use Jurisdiction reside in Counties and Cities?
Counties - Land outside of a city (Unincorporated Territory)
Cities - Only within its borders
What must Counties and Cities have?
Counties - Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission
Cities - City Council and Planning Commission
What are the 3 Local Decision Types?
Legislative Acts, Quasi-Judicial, & Ministerial
What does the Legislative Acts consist of?
The city is establishing/modifying policy
Discretionary (City doesn’t have to change it or pursue it)
The city council must approve it
Subject to Referendum and Initiative
Subject to CEQA (Environmental Review)
What does Quasi-Judicial consist of?
Applying discretionary/legislative policy to projects (applies details/specifics to a projects, when they weren’t addressed back in the legislative act)
Some discretion may be required (making a judgement, if it fits the policy)
The Planning Commission must approve it
Subject to Appeal
Might be subject to CEQA
What does Ministerial consist of?
Apply the the policies to the project
Mandatory actions if conditions met (Actions by public officials)
Planning Staff Actions
May be subject to Appeal
No CEQA
What does Referendum and Initiative mean?
Referendum - Community opposition, that is trying to negate/change a city council decision
Initiative - People wanting the government to addressed/take action on something they haven’t addressed/done
What does Planning Staff Action do ?
Reviews Projects
Ensures that they meet the laws and policies (requirements)
Does the project need to change something?
What is Police Power?
Ability to restrict private activities to achieve a public benefit (health, welfare, and morals) THERE HAS TO BE A LINK
What are the 3 cases that are examples of Police Power?
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co, 1926
Berman v. Parker, 1954
Associated HomeBuilders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of Livermore, 1976
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co, 1926
Facts: Euclid used its police power—the government's basic authority to protect public health and safety—to create zoning laws that separated houses from factories. A developer named Ambler Realty owned land planned for industrial use, but the new zoning made part of it residential-only. This cut the property's value from $10,000 down to $2,500 an acre, leading Ambler to sue.
Question: Can local government lower private property value through regulation without paying financial compensation
Conclusion: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the town, establishing police power as the legal foundation for modern urban planning and zoning. The Court reasoned that keeping factories away from homes protects neighborhood health and safety
Berman v. Parker, 1954
Facts
Washington, D.C. created an urban renewal plan to clear out run-down neighborhoods. To rebuild the area, the city used eminent domain to seize all the land—including a clean, fully working department store owned by Max Berman. Berman sued, claiming the city couldn't take a healthy business just to redevelop the neighborhood.
The Question at Play
Can the government use its power to seize private property if the land itself isn't blighted, but sits inside a broader urban planning area?
Conclusion
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the city, deciding that police power includes making a community "beautiful as well as healthy." Planners can rebuild entire neighborhoods as a single project rather than piece by piece.
Associated HomeBuilders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of Livermore, 1976
Facts
To combat rapid growth, overcrowded schools, and sewage shortages, voters in Livermore, California passed an initiative banning new residential building permits until educational and sanitation facilities met specific standards. A homebuilders association sued, arguing that halting housing development violated the constitutional right to travel and abused local police power by shifting regional growth burdens onto neighboring communities.
The Question at Play
Can a city use its police power to enact growth-control measures that limit housing construction, or does restricting regional growth violate the constitutional rights of outsiders and exceed local authority?
Conclusion
The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city, upholding local growth-control ordinances as a constitutional use of police power. The court established the "Livermore Test," ruling that local land-use restrictions are valid if they reasonably relate to the public welfare of the entire surrounding region, rather than just the interests of the local municipality.
What is Elastic?
Let’s cities to adapt regulations to suit the interests and needs of community over time
What are the 2 cases that are examples of Elastic?
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 1974
Rancho La Costa v. County of San Diego, 1990
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 1974
Facts:
A village restricted land use to single-family dwellings and defined a "family" to prohibit more than two unrelated people from living together, targeting a house rented by college students.
Question:
Does using police power to define a "family" and restrict who can live together violate constitutional privacy or equal protection rights?
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court upheld the ordinance, ruling that police power allows communities to create quiet, low-density residential zones free from noise and congestion.
Rancho La Costa v. County of San Diego, 1990
Facts:
A developer sued the county for inverse condemnation after local general plan updates designated private land for a future regional park and delayed urban annexation.
Question:
Does updating a long-range general plan or changing land-use goals constitute an illegal "taking" of private property under police power?
Conclusion:
The California Court of Appeal ruled for the county, holding that police power gives cities the flexibility to adapt general plans as community needs change over time without owing damages to landowners.
What does Elastic include?
Aesthetics
Economic Interests
Character, Stability, Soul
What are the cases that are examples of Aesthetics?
Erlich v. City of Culver City, 1966
Public Art Fee
Metromedia Inc. v. City of San Diego, 1980
Bans Offsite Advertising Signs
Disney v. City of Concord, 2011
Regulating Recreational Vehicle Storage on Residential Property
What are the cases that are examples of Economic Interests?
Kelo v. City of New London, 2005
Land condemned for economic
Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley, 1976
Validity of local rent control
Griffin Dev Co v. City of Oxnard, 1985
Validity of condo conversion regulations
What are the cases that are examples of Character, Stability, Soul?
Ewing v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, 1992
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. City of Turlock, 2006
What are the Rules for Action?
The court will support you if…
You didn’t act at random and that you ain’t inconsistent
Not discriminatory (Not targeting a certain group)
Advanced a government interest
Allows economically viable use (taking) and satisfies due process (public input)
What case is an example of Rules for Action?
G&D Holland Construction Co. V. City of Marysville, 1970
Can a city make rules/laws that overrules state rules/laws?
No, if the California government passes laws to fully control a topic, a city cannot make its own rules about it. (State law beats City law)