1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Litigation
the bringing/defending of an action in court
What percent of lawsuits settle instead of going to jury verdict
95%
parties
different people who might find themselves in a lawsuit
plaintiff
initiatives the lawsuit by filing a complaint
defendant
the party that is being sued in the lawsuit
counterclaims
when the defendant also asserts a claim against the plaintiff in response
third-party defendant
party brought into the lawsuit
class action
when a plaintiff files a lawsuit on behalf of themselves and all other people who have a similar claim against the defendant(s)
advantages of class action
efficiency, consistency, bring otherwise unviable cases
standing to sue
plaintiff must show that they have a legally protected stake/interest in the dispute entitling themselves to judicial relief
requirements for bringing a suit
actual case/controversy and personal stake in the resolution of the dispute because you have been directly harmed by the other side
personal jurisdiction
power of the court to hear and determine a lawsuit involving the parties in the case
do courts automatically get persona jurisdiction over the plaintiff when they file suit
true
ways to establish jurisdiction over defendants
defendant voluntarily appears
defendant is served with process
defendant is served with process outside the state where the court is located AND
defendant is accused of committing a tort in the state where the court is located
defendant owns property related to the lawsuit in the state where the court is located OR
defendant transacts substantial business related to the lawsuit in the state where the court is located
do you need to meet every requirement to establish jurisdiction over defendants
false
subject matter jurisdiction
power of the court to hear and determine lawsuits involving the legal issues int he case
what are the primary types of courts
general jurisdiction and limited jurisdiction courts
general jurisdiction court
can hear most types of lawsuits
limited jurisdiction courts
can only hear certain types of lawsuits
what is the most time consuming and expensive part of litigation
pretrial process
what is the pretrial process
pleadings
discovery
pleadings
the formal presentation of claims and defense by the parties (involves a series of written docs)
3 parts of a pleading
complaint
answer
reply
complaint
document filed by plaintiff to initiate the lawsuit, states the allegations against the defendant
answer
written response from the defendant that responds to each allegation in the complaint
can include counterclaims
reply
plaintiff’s response t the defendant’s counterclaims (if any)
4 parts of discovery
interrogatories
requests for production of documents
deposition
requests for admission
interrogatories
written questions that must be answered in writing under oath by the other side
how many days do you have to answer an interrogatory
30
what must be included in interrogatories
identify individuals that you are aware has personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances of the case—including all eyewitnesses
list all insurance agreements you have relating to the issue
requests for production of docs
how you get physical evidence from the other side
deposition
in person q&a session that are under oath
requests for admission
yes/no questions (pin down specific details for other side)
trial procedures
jury selection (voir dire)
opening statement
presentation of evidence
closing arguments
jury instruction
jury verdict
jury selection (voir dire)
prospective jurors are question by the lawyers and judge to determine their suitability to serve on jury
challenge for cause
this person cannot serve b/c they will be bias
does a judge have to agree a juror isn’t suitable when using challenge for cause
yes
peremptory challenge
you can kick off a limited number of jurors for no reason at all (not relating to race/gender tho)
opening statement
each attorney introduces their side (summary)
presentation of evidence
witnesses get called to stand and go through all evidence and cross examination
closing arguments
attorneys make emotional appeal to jury
jury instructions
judge tells jury this is what the law is and how you should apply it to the facts based on the evidence they have heard
jury verdict
jury comes together to make a unanimous verdict
burdens of proof
how convinced does the jury have to be to rule in one party’s favor
beyond reasonable doubt
no other reasonable explanation exists (95% sure)—only used in criminal cases
preponderance of the evidence
more likely than not (51% sure) based on evidence presented—civil cases only
clear and convincing proof
evidence tilts heavily in one party’s favor (bout 70% sure)
appeals process
Appellate courts: file notice with a written brief (40-60 msgs) explaining what the case is about, how the judge messed up, and why it matters, give an oral argument infant of judge, court issues an opinion
is the Supreme Court appeals process the same as the appellate court process
true