1/73
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
AMALGAM
Metallic restorative material: alloy of silver–tin–copper + mercury
Placed into a prepared cavity and hardens to restore tooth form & function
Silver-colored filling, in use for 150+ years
Cost-effective and widely researched material
Unique feature: self-seals margins by corrosion products → reduces microleakage
In addition, amalgam is the only restorative material with an interfacial seal that improves over time.
History of Amalgam
Introduced in U.S. in 1830s
First made from silver coin filings + mercury
Improvements followed with research → better formulations
1990s: debates over mercury toxicity
Once primary restorative material for >150 years
Decline in popularity today due to:
Esthetic demand for composites
Less invasive tooth prep with composites
Decreased caries prevalence
Still widely used for strength & cost-effectiveness
safe concerns of amalgam
Concerns: Mercury toxicity
Studies & agencies (ADA, USPHS, WHO, FDA) show:
Amalgam is safe & effective
No causal link to systemic diseases
Main risk: improper handling during placement/removal
Mercury disposal = ecological risk
Regulations in countries (Japan, Sweden, Germany, Canada) restrict or phase out amalgam
ADA recommends best management practices for amalgam waste
TYPES of amalgam restorations
low-copper amalgam
high-copper amalgam
low-copper amalgam
Used before 1960s
Setting reaction forms Gamma-2 (Sn–Hg) phase
Prone to corrosion - rapid breakdown of restorations
Consists of irregular-shaped particles
Requires more condensation pressure
Heavier condensation helps displace matrix bands - easier proximal contacts
Tin reacts with Mercury
Forms Gamma-2 (Sn–Hg) phase
Gamma-2 = weak & highly corrosive
Corrosion = restoration breakdown
high-copper amalgam
Used predominantly today
Contains ≥12% copper
Copper reacts with tin - eliminates weak Gamma-2 phase
Stronger & more corrosion-resistant than low-copper
Small corrosion at margins helps seal restoration
Long-lasting 12+ years of service
Available as spherical or admixed types
Tin reacts with Copper
Gamma-2 greatly reduced
Less Gamma-2 = less corrosion
Reduced corrosion =
longer durability (12+ years)
Types of High-Copper Amalgam Alloys
spherical amalgam
admixed amalgam
spherical amalgam
round alloy particles
needs little condensation pressure
high early strength
suited for large restorations, complex amalgams
admixed amalgam
Irregular (sometimes mixed with spherical)
Needs more condensation pressure
Pressure helps form better proximal contacts
Preferred when dentists want tighter contacts with adjacent teeth
NEW amalgam alloys
Developed due to concerns about mercury toxicity
Include:
Gallium alloys : Mercury-free, but unstable & corrode easily
Indium alloys : Low-mercury, better mixing, but not durable enough
Cold-welding techniques : Mercury-free, uses pressure bonding, but too weak
Aim: Mercury-free or low-mercury alternatives
Limitation: None are reliable enough for universal clinical use
PROPERTIES OF AMALAGAM
very high compressive strength (good under biting force) — strong in posterior teeth
low tensile strength (brittle under stretch) — needs bulk to resist fracture
moderate-low diametral tensile — explains splitting tendency
poor flexural strength — needs proper cavity support
low fracture toughness (prone to crack) — avoid sharp cavity angles
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
. Amalgam is strongest in compression and weaker in tension and shear
The prepared cavity design and manipulation should allow for the restoration to receive compression forces and minimum tension and shear forces.
The compressive strength of a satisfactory amalgam restoration should be atleast 310 MPa.
TENSILE STRENGTH
Amalgam is much weaker in tension
Tensile strengths of amalgam are only a fraction of their compressive strengths
Cavity design should be constructed to reduce tensile stresses resulting from biting forces
High early tensile strengths are important - resist fracture by prematurely applied biting forces
DIAMETRAL TENSILE STRENGTH
Alternative test for brittle materials like amalgam.
Measures resistance to splitting forces.
Amalgam shows moderately low values, reinforcing its brittle nature.
Clinical relevance: explains why thin amalgam restorations fracture easily.
FLEXURAL STRENGTH
Amalgam has poor flexural strength.
Cannot resist bending forces well.
Clinical relevance: cavity design must provide strong support to restoration
FRACTURE STRENGTH
Low fracture toughness compared to tooth structure or ceramics.
Brittle material → cracks can propagate under stress.
Clinical relevance: sharp internal line angles in cavity prep should be avoided to reduce stress concentration.
EXPANSION/DIMENSIONAL CHANGE
change in volume (expansion or contraction) during/after setting.
Clinical Note: Proper condensation reduces residual mercury → minimizes dimensional changes.
Conventional amalgam:
Zinc-containing types → may undergo delayed expansion when contaminated with moisture.
Can cause protrusion of restoration & marginal gaps.
High-copper amalgam:
More dimensionally stable (less expansion/contraction).
Improved marginal seal compared to older formulations.
Conventional low copper amalgam
have high creep values and exhibit poor marginal integrity over time as the amalgam creeps into a thin layer and then breaks of creating marginal ditching.
Contemporary high copper amalgams
have low creep values and maintain good marginal integrity as a Function of time.
CREEP
deFined as time dependent plastic deformation of a material under static load or constant stress. his property is important with silver amalgam.
Significance: Creep is one of the few properties that directly predicts clinical longevity of amalgam restorations.
THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
is the rate at which thermal changes are conducted through a material.
Amalgam = good conductor of heat and cold (like metals).
Effect in mouth:
Rapid transmission of temperature changes to the pulp.
May cause postoperative sensitivity if remaining dentin is thin.
Clinical solution:
Use liners or bases (CaOH, GIC, or zinc phosphate cement) if dentin <2 mm to protect pulp.
Comparison:
Amalgam = conductor
Composite = insulator (but has higher sensitivity due to other reasons → polymerization shrinkage, microleakage).
ADVANTAGES of amalgam
Ease of use, Easy to manipulate
Relatively inexpensive
Excellent wear resistance
Restoration is completed within one sitting without requiring much chair side time.
Well condensed and triturated amalgam has good compressive strength.
Sealing ability improves with age by formation of corrosion products at tooth amalgam interface.
Relatively not technique sensitive.
Bonded amalgams have "bonding benefits".
Less microleakage
Slightly increased strength of remaining tooth structure.
Minimal postoperative sensitivity.
disADVANTAGES of amalgam
Unnatural appearance (non esthetic)
Tarnish and corrosion
Metallic taste and galvanic shock
Discoloration of tooth structure
Lack of chemical or mechanical adhesion to the tooth structure.
Mercury toxicity
Promotes plaque adhesion
Delayed expansion
Weakens tooth structure (unless bonded).
uses of amalgam
Class I, II, V restorations
Foundations
Caries-control restoration
Indications of amalgam
Moderate to large Class I and II posterior restorations where esthetics are not critical.
Situations with difficulty in moisture control (saliva, blood, gingival fluids).
Areas subjected to heavy occlusal stress.
When cost-effectiveness is a major consideration.
As foundations (cores) for crowns.
Temporary restorations in cases needing caries control.
Extends onto the root surface
Cannot be well isolated
tooth that serves as an abutment for a removable partial denture.
contraIndications of amalgam
Esthetically sensitive areas (anterior region, facial surfaces of premolars/molars visible in smile).
Small-moderate class I-II & class VI conservative lesions where composite resin provides better esthetics.
When patient has proven allergy to mercury (rare).
In cases where strong enamel bonding is advantageous.
areas that can be well isolated
advantages of using amalgam for Class I, II and VI defects
Ease of use
Simplicity of procedure
Placing and contouring are generally easier than those for composite restorations
disadvantages of using amalgam for Class I, II and VI defects
Amalgam use requires more complex and larger tooth preparations than composite resin.
Amalgams may be considered to have a non-esthetic appearance by some patients.
Conservative Class I Amalgam Restorations
done to protect the pulp, preserve tooth strength, and reduce deterioration of the restoration.
By saving as much tooth structure as possible, it minimizes pulpal irritation and keeps the crown strong.
This approach also improves marginal integrity, ensuring a better seal and longer-lasting restoration.
The procedure involves basic steps—preparation, placement, and contouring of amalgam—which can be adapted for more extensive Class I restorations when needed.
Initial Clinical Procedures
After achieving profound anesthesia, isolation of the tooth is recommended—ideally with a rubber dam to maintain field control and ensure mercury hygiene. For a single maxillary tooth with minimal caries, cotton rolls and high-volume evacuation may provide sufficient isolation. A pre-operative evaluation of the occlusal relationship of the treated and adjacent teeth is also essential.
INITIAL TOOTH PREPARATION for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
establishes the outline form to sound tooth structure with a conservative depth (just inside the DEJ) while providing resistance and retention. For Class I amalgam, only defective pits and fissures are included, avoiding sharp angles.
The resistance principles are:
Extending around cusps to conserve structure and avoid pulp horns
Keeping facial and lingual extensions minimal between groove and cusp tips
Extending to include fissures with margins on sound structure
Minimally extending into marginal ridges only to remove defects
Eliminating weak enamel walls if outlines are <0.5 mm apart
Extending to include enamel undermined by caries
Using enameloplasty for shallow fissures to conserve structure
Establishing an optimal, conservative pulpal wall depth
Burs Used for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
No. 245 bur (3 mm, 0.8 mm tip) → slight occlusal convergence, rounded line angles for strength
No. 330 bur → smaller, for highly conservative preps
Entry & Depth for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
Punch cut at deepest pit (distal first for visibility)
Bur parallel to long axis of tooth
Initial depth: 1.5 mm (reaches DEJ, 0.1–0.2 mm into dentin)
Final pulpal depth: 1.5–2 mm
Isthmus width: 1–1.5 mm (just wider than bur) → reduces fracture risk
Outline Form for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
Smooth, flowing curves, distinct margins
Include only defective pits/fissures and undermined enamel
Minimal extension into marginal ridges (≥1.6 mm premolars, ≥2 mm molars)
Eliminate weak enamel walls (<0.5 mm apart)
Resistance Form for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
Flat pulpal floor in sound dentin
Minimal external wall extension → preserves tooth strength
Strong enamel margins supported by dentin
Depth provides adequate amalgam bulk (resists fracture/wear)
Retention Form for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
Slight occlusal convergence of walls prevents dislodgment
FINAL TOOTH PREPARATION for CLASS I, II, AND VI AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
Removal of Defects
Eliminate remaining defective enamel and infected dentin on pulpal floor.
Small remnants → removed with carbide bur.
Larger caries → removed with spoon excavator or slow-speed round bur.
Stop excavation once dentin feels hard/firm (not all discolored dentin needs removal).
Management of Caries Depth
Ideal/shallow depth → no liner or base required.
Deep areas (≤0.5–1 mm dentin remaining) → place thin RMGI liner (0.5–0.75 mm) only over deepest spot.
RMGI functions: pulp protection, fluoride release, bonding, reduces microleakage.
External Walls & Margins
External walls finished earlier.
No bevels on occlusal cavosurface.
Maintain 90–100° cavosurface angle → 80–90° amalgam angle → strongest margin (“butt joint”).
Prevents chipping since amalgam is brittle with low edge strength.
Cleaning & Inspection
Remove debris with air-water spray.
Optional: disinfectant.
Common method: cotton pellet moistened with water.
Apply desensitizer/bonding agent as the first restorative step.
Desensitizer Placement
Applied before amalgam condensation to reduce dentin sensitivity.
Procedure:
Apply desensitizer per manufacturer’s instructions.
Remove excess moisture (avoid over-drying dentin).
Condense amalgam into place.
Mechanism: Forms lamellar plugs in dentinal tubules → reduces permeability & sensitivity.
Notes:
No hybrid layer forms (unlike bonding).
If amalgam adhesives are used, separate desensitizer usually not needed.
Concerns remain about durability of adhesives and possible interference with amalgam’s self-sealing ability
MATRIX PLACEMENT
Generally, matrices are unnecessary for a conservative Class I amalgam restoration except as specified in later sections.
Insertion & Carving of Amalgam
Amalgam Selection & Mixing
High-copper amalgam recommended for better performance.
Available in pre-proportioned capsules (400–800 mg).
Some require activation before trituration.
Mix (triturate) per manufacturer’s instructions.
Amalgam should be smooth & slightly wet, not dry/crumbly.
Large restorations may need several mixes.
Insertion & Condensation
Objectives:
Adapt amalgam to cavity walls & matrix.
Achieve a void-free restoration.
Reduce marginal leakage & corrosion, increase strength.
Condensation tips:
Spherical amalgam → use larger condensers.
Admixed amalgam → start with smaller condensers, then larger for over-packing.
Condense in increments (1/3–½ depth each).
Each stroke should overlap previous one.
Over-pack 1 mm beyond cavosurface margin.
Condensation must be done within 2.5–3.5 minutes.
CONTOURING AND FINISHING OF THE AMALGAM
Carving
Begin immediately after condensation with sharp carvers (discoid–cleoid, Hollenback).
Carve perpendicular to margins; rest blade edge on adjacent unprepared tooth to guide.
Avoid deep grooves (weakens amalgam).
Remove flash (thin extension beyond margin).
Margins must match cavosurface contour.
Over-carving (>0.2 mm submarginal defect) → replace restoration.
Carved surface may be smoothed with damp cotton.
Burnishing & Occlusion
Post-carve burnishing:
Light rubbing → smoother, satin finish.
Improves marginal integrity & surface smoothness.
Occlusal adjustment:
Use articulating paper → identify “high” spots.
Reduce premature contacts until occlusion is stable.
Contacts should occur on flat surfaces, not inclines.
Final anatomy must follow normal occlusal contours.
Advise patient: no heavy biting for 24 hrs.
Finishing & Polishing
Usually not required, but done to:
Refine anatomy, contours, margins, texture.
Reduce tarnish & corrosion risk.
Timing: after 24 hrs (crystallization complete).
Finishing:
Use white alumina or green carborundum stones → correct margins.
Smooth with finishing burs (round or small burs for anatomy).
Polishing:
Start with coarse rubber points → satiny surface.
Progress to medium & fine-grit points → high luster.
Keep low speed to avoid overheating (>60°C → pulp damage, mercury release).
Alternative: pumice + chalk with rubber cup.
Extensive Class I Amalgam Restorations
Extensive Class I Caries & Amalgam Use
Definition of extensive caries:
Infected dentin within <1 mm from pulp, or
Lesion extends up cuspal inclines
Restorative choice:
Amalgam preferred for large Class I restorations
Provides excellent wear resistance and maintains occlusal contacts
Bonded amalgam:
Previously suggested for very large restorations
No proven advantage over conventional technique when done properly
Initial Tooth Preparation in Extensive Class I Amalgams
Initial Tooth Preparation in Extensive Class I Amalgams
Liner placement (if needed): Protects pulp before tooth preparation.
Outline, resistance, retention forms: Established using No. 245 bur.
Depth: ~1.5 mm at pits/fissures, ~2 mm on external walls (to reach DEJ).
Extension: Laterally at DEJ to remove undermined enamel.
Caries on cuspal inclines: Adjust bur axis for 90–100° cavosurface angle (avoids weak margins or over-deep pulpal floor).
Resistance form: Strong enamel walls, preserved cuspal support.
Retention form: Achieved by occlusal wall convergence; may include undercuts in dentin.
Enameloplasty: Used when possible.
Cusp capping:
Indicated if defect > ½ distance between primary groove & cusp tip.
Required if defect ≥ ⅔ distance (prevents cusp fracture).
FINAL TOOTH PREPARATION in Extensive Class I Amalgams
Pulp Protection in Extensive Class I Amalgam Preparations
Remaining infected dentin: Removed as in conservative prep.
Pulp exposure: Requires direct pulp cap (Ca(OH)₂) or endodontic treatment.
Very deep caries (<0.5 mm RDT):
Place thin calcium hydroxide liner (0.5–0.75 mm) only at deepest area.
Stimulates secondary/tertiary dentin formation.
Cover liner with RMGI base:
Provides support against condensation forces.
Prevents dissolution, seals excavation.
Important: Do not cover entire dentin surface—only deepest portion.
Secondary resistance/retention: Usually unnecessary in extensive Class I.
Final step: Finish external walls as previously described.
Restorative Technique for Extensive Class I Amalgam
After liner/base placement: Apply dentin desensitizer
Amalgam preparation:
Triturate as directed
Slightly overfill cavity
Enhance condensation with precarve burnishing
Carving:
More complex due to cuspal inclines
Must establish correct contours, occlusal contacts, grooves, and fossae
Finishing & polishing: Same techniques as in conservative restorations
Class I Occlusolingual Amalgam Restorations
Indicated for maxillary molars
Used when lingual fissure connects with distal oblique fissure and distal pit
Composite may be an alternative for smaller restorations
Initial Clinical Procedures
Begin with local anesthesia
Evaluate occlusal contacts before preparation
Rubber dam usually recommended for proper isolation
Cotton rolls may be sufficient for typical Class I preparations
Found in mandibular molars where fissures extend:
From occlusal surface → facial cusp ridge → facial surface
Preparation & restoration techniques are similar to occlusolingual restorations
Restorative options:
Composite (for smaller defects)
Amalgam (illustrated in Fig. 14-38)
Finishing & polishing:
Done after amalgam sets completely
Abrasive points may be modified in shape for optimal polishing
Final Procedures: Cleaning and Inspecting
1. Cleaning the preparation
Flush visible debris with water from syringe.
Remove visible moisture using a few light bursts of air.
If debris remains (e.g., clinging to walls/angles):
Use an explorer or small cotton pellet to loosen/remove it.
2. Precautions
Avoid over-drying with air → can dehydrate the tooth and damage odontoblasts in exposed tubules.
3. Inspection
Ensure the preparation is:
Completely debrided (no debris, plaque, or caries).
Properly shaped (no unnecessary undercuts or unsupported enamel).
No further modifications required before restoration placement.
Purpose of Rigid Matrix
Prevents “landsliding” of amalgam during condensation
Ensures marginal adaptation and restoration strength
Tofflemire Matrix Retainer
Commonly used to secure the matrix band
Limitation: poor adaptation to the lingual groove → requires reinforcement
Stainless Steel Strip
Dimensions: 0.002 in thick × 8 mm wide
Placed between lingual surface & Tofflemire band
Positioned slightly gingival for added stability
Stabilization Options
Rigid PVS material between matrices (prevents lingual displacement)
Green stick compound on wedge → pressed with burnisher for tight seal
Barton Matrix
Combination of:
Tofflemire band
Stainless steel strip
Rigid support (PVS or compound)
Provides rigid lingual matrix for proper condensation
Sometimes sufficient with strip matrix + wedge only
Finishing of the Amalgam Restoration
Carving
Start immediately once preparation is slightly overfilled
Instruments: Discoid-cleoid or Hollenback carver
Carve with blade perpendicular to margin, moving parallel to margin
Prevent over-carving by guiding along adjacent tooth surface
Matrix & Excess Removal
Use an explorer to clear excess amalgam near lingual matrix before removal
Final Steps
Remove rubber dam
Adjust restoration for proper occlusion
Finishing & polishing usually not required (only in specific cases)
Purpose of Class II restoration:
Restore tooth structure lost to caries
Maintain proper occlusion and contact
Provide retention and resistance form
Initial Tooth Preparation: Occlusal Outline
Enter pit nearest the carious proximal surface
Use No. 245 bur with high-speed drill under water spray
Maintain bur parallel to the long axis of the tooth
Depth and Width of Occlusal Step: Reach DEJ (approximately 1.5–2 mm from occlusal surface)
Isthmus width narrow, ideally same as No. 245 bur
Follow the rise and fall of the central fissure
Wall Preparation & Retention Form: Facial, lingual, and distal walls slightly convergent occlusally
Extend walls to sound DEJ
Dovetail in distal pit if necessary
Enameloplasty if indicated
Extension to Proximal Surface: Extend toward the marginal ridge (~0.8 mm short of contact)
Expose DEJ at marginal ridge
Width sufficient for proximal box
Class II Amalgam: Proximal Outline Form (Proximal Box)
Include all caries, defects, or existing restorations
Create 90-degree cavosurface margins (butt joint)
Maintain minimal clearance (~0.5 mm) from adjacent teeth
Initial Proximal Ditch Cut: Isolate proximal enamel by cutting a ditch along DEJ
Cut approximately 2/3 enamel, 1/3 dentin (0.5–0.6 mm enamel, 0.2–0.3 mm dentin)
Pressure directed gingivally and toward proximal surface
Gingival and Axial Wall Depth: Gingival extension just beyond caries or contact
Axial wall depth ~0.5 mm; deeper if retention grooves needed
Premolars may have shallower proximal boxes than molars
Faciolingual and Gingival Divergence: Proximal ditch may diverge gingivally for retention
Extension includes defective or old material, conserves marginal ridge
Avoid excessive clearance >0.5 mm unless needed
Completing Proximal Margins: Two cuts from facial and lingual limits perpendicular to proximal surface
Remaining isolated enamel may fracture; remove with spoon excavator or bur
Use wedge to protect gingiva and rubber dam
Resistance and Retention Form: Resistance form: pulpal/gingival walls level, preserve cusps, restrict occlusal extension, reverse curve, round internal line angles, sufficient amalgam thickness
Retention form: occlusal convergence of facial and lingual walls, dovetail if present
Class II Amalgam: Final Tooth Preparation
Removal of Defective Enamel and Infected Dentin: Remove enamel pit-and-fissure remnants
Remove infected dentin with slow-speed round bur or spoon excavator
Stop excavation before all stained dentin is removed
Resistance Form Preservation: Maintain pulpal seats perpendicular to tooth axis in sound dentin
Axial wall caries removal without compromising resistance
Old restorative material may remain if intact and asymptomatic
Maintain facial and lingual gingival corners at a more occlusal position
Careful amalgam placement and light condensation in extended areas
Gingival Wall Considerations: Maintain facial and lingual gingival corners at a more occlusal position
Careful amalgam placement and light condensation in extended areas
Minor Variations from Ideal Preparation: Partial facial or lingual wall extension permissible if:
1. Wall is not weakened
2. Extension is accessible and visible
3. Sufficient gingival seats remain
4. Butt-joint fit (90-degree margins) is possible
Secondary Resistance Form
Retention grooves in axiofacial and axiolingual line angles
Controversial necessity in narrow conservative proximal boxes
strengthens tooth
and restoration
Secondary Retention Form
Retention grooves in axiofacial and axiolingual line angles
Controversial necessity in narrow conservative proximal boxes
Avoid using improperly positioned line angles as guides
Preparation of Proximal Retention Grooves
Use No. 169 L or No. 14 round bur with air coolant and reduced speed
Position: 0.2 mm inside DEJ in axiofacial and axiolingual line angles
Depth: 0.5 mm at gingival floor level, tapering occlusally
Occlusogingival orientation: bur tilt controls occlusal height
- Proximal retention grooves enhance independent retention
Do not remove dentin supporting proximal enamel
Do not prepare grooves entirely in axial wall
External Wall Preparation
Avoid unsupported enamel and irregular margins
No occlusal cavosurface bevel indicated
Proximal margin: ideally 90°, maximum 100°
Amalgam fracture risk if margin angle < 80°
Occlusal line angle: 90–100° or greater
Gingival Margin Finishing
Mesial gingival margin trimmer: 6°–20° slight bevel in enamel
Distal gingival margin trimmer or explorer tine
No bevel if margin is below CEJ on the root
Purpose of a matrix:
Restores natural tooth shape
Maintains contact with adjacent teeth
Prevents gingival overhang
Supports filling material during placement
Qualities of a Good Matrix
Rigid & stable
Accurate anatomical contour
Correct proximal contact
Prevents gingival excess
Easy to apply & remove
Universal (Tofflemire)
– versatile, used for 2–3 surface restorations
Sectional Matrix
– contoured, supported by rigid material
Precontoured Matrix Strips
– ready-to-use metal strips
CARVING for Class VI Amalgam Restorations
Use small discoid–cleoid or hollenback carvers for anatomical contour
Maintain natural cusp/incisal edge morphology
Carve with occlusal/incisal guidance to restore function
Avoid overcarving to prevent weak amalgam edges
FINISHING for Class VI Amalgam Restorations
Delay polishing for 24 hours to allow amalgam to set
Use finishing burs, stones, or strips (for anterior)
Smooth cavosurface margins to reduce plaque retention
Check occlusion carefully (incisal/cusp contacts)
FINISHING for Class VI Amalgam Restorations
Small defects: repair with fresh amalgam addition
Older restorations may require retention grooves or slots
Composite repair possible in esthetic zones
Indirect restorations for large fractures or wear
1.5 mm
Minimum bulk required for strength and longevity of amalgam
Indications of Class VI Amalgam Restorations
cusp tip/incisal edge breakdown from
attrition, erosion, abrasion, or hypoplastic pits
Common complaints of Class VI Amalgam Restorations
sensitivity, food impaction, sharp
enamel edges, esthetic concerns