1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the 2 types of Criminal Law?
Substantive criminal law & criminal procedure
Substantive Criminal Law
legal definitions of law
Criminal Procedure
rules governing the CJ system
Where are criminal justice rules found?
in the 4th, 5th, 6th, & 8th amendments of the Bill of Rights
Rule of Law
Prevents criminal law from becoming a tool for dictators
No ex post facto laws
no law that makes an action a crime after it was already committed.
Vagueness doctrine
Without a clear way to behave or without clear laws people are more likely to deviate
Strict Construction
Interpreting the law in the strictest manner possible so they can’t just easily convict someone
Common Law
(originated in the UK) essentially “Judge Made” law: allowing judges the freedom to interpret the law, usually based on precedent (actions/laws made before them).
Stare Decisis
making rulings based off of prior decisions (this doesn’t make laws permanent)
Elements of crime
3 parts to a crime from a legal standpoint
Part 1 to a crime: Guilty Act (actus reus “criminal act”)
Harm done with free will; can punish people for something that someone was planning to do or is about to commit (inchoate crime)
What’s a good case that represents Failure to Act?
David Cash, Jr. - guy that walked away while his best friend raped & killed a 7 year old girl in a women’s bathroom.
Part 2 to a Crime: Guilty Mind (mens rea “the intent to harm”)
acting with the intent to commit a crime (sometimes not intentional)
Reckless
knowing risks & commiting the crime anyways
Negligence
someone’s too stupid to understand the possible outcomes/consequences
What is strict liability
not all crimes require mens rea
Part 3 to a Crime: Causation
the act had to cause actual human harm
“Victimless crimes”
not every crime has to cause direct harm or has a specific victim
Causation has to be proven…
beyond a reasonable doubt
What do courts not have to prove?
motive
Criminal Defenses
anything a defendant uses for acquittal or punishment reduction
Failure to Prove
prosecutor failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt (not enough evidence, didn’t do their job well, etc.)
Justification
crime was necessary under the given circumstances
Proportionality
has to be a reasonable enough threat that equals the crime committed
Necessity
circumstances where someone had to commit the crime
Whats an example of necessity?
ODU ROTC Cadets killing a school shooter or robbing as a poor/homeless person
What are excuses in criminal defense?
Insanity defense (extremely rare- less than 1% of cases plead this defense), duress, age, alibi, entrapment, & double jeopardy.
Insanity defense 1: M’Naghten (ma-knot-en) Rule
did the defendant know the difference between right and wrong
Insanity defense 2: Durham Test (Mental Disease)
defendant did what they did because of a mental defect or disease (most states have gotten rid of this)
Duress
committing a crime because they were forced to (ex: being held at gunpoint & told to do something illegal)
Age
Can’t prosecute children 0-13 but can send them to delinquency/detention centers. Those 14 & older are put through the regular prosecution process.
Alibi
evidence that says the person couldn’t have been there when the crime happened (can be a person, CCTV/security footage, etc.)
Entrapment
a case where the defendant claims to be “set up” by police/law enforcement
Double Jeopardy
same person can’t be tried for the same crime twice (ex: couldn’t put OJ in jail after writing his book (essentially confessing murder) because the trial was over)