1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
moral anxiety
attempting to violate superego’s beliefs/ideas
neurotic anxiety
fear of losing control of id’s impulses
violates superego’s moral standards
psychoanalytic model/an
rejection of femininity
fear of oral impregnation
self-starvation b/c of this
maturity fears → drive self-starvation; attempt to revert to a prepubertal state
fear of becoming fat
symptoms are defenses to reduce neurotic anxiety over conflict between ego/id
developed during preoedipal stage where primary gratification is through oral drives (ages 0-1)
parents not off the hook:
mom’s aggressive/castrating (not a good role model for femininity)
dad’s kind/passive (good model for femininity except he’s male)
conflict emerges in adolescence when girls are supposed to adopt more adult (sex-specific) roles
psychoanalytic model/bn
over identification w/ femininity
desire for pregnancy
feminist psychodynamic theory
specific to female children
parents still not off the hook
mom’s controlling b/c she’s powerless outside the home
dad’s distant/passive
child defines her self-worth based on how she perceives others’ reactions to her/learns that power can only be achieved by attaining a relationship w/ a man
problems emerge in adolescence b/c girl doesn’t know how to socialize w/ men (no practice w/ father)
enters vicious cycle of attempting to literally “fit” in through her weight/thinness
Bruch’s psychodynamic theory
mothers still not off the hook
during daughter’s infancy, mother didn’t respond appropriately to daughter’s cues for hunger, fatigue, distress
b/c daughter’s unable to change mother’s behavior, infant adapt to accept what mother offers
apparent “perfection” → become perfectionists later in life
profound sense of ineffectiveness → kind of stuck later in life
fundamental inability to distinguish among driven states (alexithymia)
when adolescence places pressures on girls to develop autonomy, they feel overwhelmed/rebel against symbolic source of material nurturance-food
alexithymia
fundamental inability to distinguish among driven states; poor interoceptive awareness
family systems
parents still to blame
adolescent w/ AN is “identified patient” however, illness is systemic
problem is in the family system, not within the individual
AN families enmeshed, overprotective, rigid, conflict avoidant
creates problems when child enters adolescence b/c family’s unable to adjust to child’s need to develop autonomy
b/c family conflict cannot be expressed openly, it’s expressed bodily (self-starvation in AN, but could be expressed other ways) → somaticizing
somaticizing
not being able to express family conflict openly leads to the bodily expression of it
ex: AN would be through self-starvation
could be through other ailments like allergies, diabetes
learning
EDs run in families
children learn disordered eating attitudes/behaviors from their parents (just like they learn anything else)
social learning through modeling
ex: mom’s constantly dieting
direct instruction
ex: mom tells girls she’s getting too fat/puts her on a diet
klein et al. (2017)
college students completed surveys in college/at 20-year follow-up
reported on their own drive for thinness at both time points as well as baseline:
frequency of parental dieting
frequency of parental comments other weight/eating
examine prospective association between modeling (dieting frequency) vs. direct comments on changes in drive for thinness
baseline:
men/women didn’t differ in reports of parental dieting, both reported that moms dieted more than dads
women reported getting more comments from both parents on their own weight/eating compared to men
20-year follow-up
mom’s dieting frequency/dad’s comments predicted increased drive for thinness in women
no associations found in men
social contagion theory
Crandall (1988)
studied binge eating in sorority sisters in two sororities at the beginning/end of academic year
binge eating increased over time, and those who bingers at similar frequency to others were the most popular
peer selection/socialization
Zalta/Keel (2006)
studied similarity among selected peers, unselected peers, non-peers on self-esteem, perfectionism, bulimic symptoms
participants were most similar to selected peers on these outcomes, regardless of duration of contact/period of separation
implies that it’s not just the time spent together that factors into this
objectification theory
women who come to view their bodies as objects rather than agents experience increased pressure to conform to thin ideal
wick/keel (2020)
study 1
self-report surveys of college students regarding use of apps to edit appearance on photos posted to IG/disordered eating
results:
higher EAT-26 scores in those who posted edited photos
higher likelihood of having an ED I those who posted edited photos compared to those who didn't
non-hispanic White/Asian students more likely to edit compared to AA/Black students
study 2
experiment in which some participants from study 1 who endorsed editing photos brought into the lab, photographed, assigned to 1 of 4 conditions
results:
those randomly assigned to edit/post photos experienced significant increases in ED cognitions
maintained urges to engage in extreme weight control behaviors
all effects were temporary
personality
stable way in which individuals perceive, react to, interact w/ their environments that’s influenced by both biology/experience
broader concept encompassing temperament, learned behaviors, and life expectancies
temperament
biologically-based predisposition to experience certain emotional/behavioral response
building block upon which personality develops
four dimensions:
novelty seeking
harm avoidance
reward dependence
persistance
novelty seeking
related to temperament
tendency to pursue rewards
behavioral activation system (BAS)
harm avoidance
related to temperament
tendency to avoid punishment by inhibiting behavior
behavioral inhibition system (BIS)
reward dependance
related to temperament
tendency to continue rewarded behavior
persistence
related to temperament
tendency to continue behavior not immediately rewarded despite frustration/fatigue
linked to ambition, obstinacy, obsessive-compulsive features
ed relations to personality
AN:
low novelty seeking
high harm avoidance
high persistence
BN:
high harm avoidance
high novelty seeking
ED patients more sensitive to punishments than controls
BED:
high novelty seeking
high harm avoidance
no difference compared to obese non-BED individuals
positive emotionality
tendency to enjoy and actively engage in work and social interactions
negative emotionality
tendency to experience negative mood states
ex: sadness, anxiety, anger
constraint
tendency to inhibit impulses and show caution, restraint, conventionalism
ed relation to constraint
AN:
high levels of constraint
high levels of negative emotionality
low levels of positive emotionality
BN:
low levels of positive emotionality
high levels of negative emotionality
lower constraint compared to AN
BED:
no difference between BED/non-obese individuals
perfectionism increases risk for AN/BN
positive reinforcement
in relation to operant conditioning
ex: dieting accompanied by initial weight loss → reinforcement through compliments/attention
patients w/ AN complimented more even when they looked emaciated
binge eating episodes usually w/ foods associated w/ rewards
ex: ice cream, cookies, etc
negative reinforcement
in relation to operant conditioning
not engaging in the behavior has undesired consequences
feeling nothing is better than feeling distressed
sometimes more powerful than positive reinforcement
punishment
in relation to operant conditioning
ex: patients w/ AN feel like eating is a punishment
these decrease a behavior
ex: not going to go work out at the gym b/c they feel shame
research shows those w/ EDs may be more sensitive to immediate responses/don’t think about long-term consequences
attention
women w/ EDs pay more attention to food and body weight-related things compared to women w/out EDs
could be both conscious/unconscious effort
attentional bias could be seen especially w/ AN patients
maintain vigilance over perceived threat of their self-worth
cognitive distortions
experiences/thoughts that don’t correctly reflect reality
perceptual disturbance required for diagnosis of AN
dichotomous thinking
cognitive distortion expressed in many of the features common to Eds
black-and-white thinking
AN ex: thin = good, fat = bad
BN ex: either eat nothing or eat everything
disinhibition
loss of control over eating → cognitive control is lost
cognitive disinhibitor
affective disinhibitor
pharmacological disinhibitor
cognitive disinhibitor
type of disinhibition
ex: going to a party, being offered cake, feeling like they “blew” the diet so they might as well eat everything
affective disinhibitor
type of disinhibition
ex: having a fight w/ a loved one, feeling sad, eating to cope w/ distress
pharmacological disinhibitor
type of disinhibition
ex: being intoxicated and losing track of how much one has eaten
selective abstraction
a part come to represent the whole
particularly for perfectionists
ex: if thighs seem fat, they think every other part of their body is fat
restraint hypothesis
hypothesis
consumption of unusually large amount of food due to the loss of cognitive function that helps determine whether someone’s hungry or full
personality traits
enduring patterns of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about the environment and oneself that are exhibited in a wide range of social and personal contexts
lens through which cultural messages could be magnified and impact behaviors
including seeking out environment that further reinforce disordered eating behaviors
big 5
openness to experience
consciousness
extraversion
agreeableness
neuroticism