Ecological Interactions: Predation, Competition, and Mutualism

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/142

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

143 Terms

1
New cards

Introduced species

Species that are introduced to a region of the world where it has not historically existed, generally by human activity, either accidentally or on purpose.

2
New cards

Invasive species

Introduced species that spreads rapidly and has negative effects on other species, human recreation, or human economies.

3
New cards

Biological control

Introducing species to help control the abundance of another species.

4
New cards

Benefits of biocontrol

Environmental safety because agents are typically non-toxic to humans, animals, and plants, and it is cost-effective once established, promoting natural ecosystem balance.

5
New cards

Unintended consequences of biocontrol

Nontarget effects where sometimes non-target species are affected, unanticipated spread, resistance development, and long-term ecological changes.

6
New cards

Mesopredator

Relatively small carnivores that consume herbivores and are not at the top of food chains.

7
New cards

Top predators

Predators that consume both herbivores and mesopredators and are at the top of the food chain with no natural predators of their own.

8
New cards

Functional response curve

The relationship between prey density and an individual predator's rate of food consumption, showing how many prey are available and how much the predator eats.

9
New cards

I response

Results in a constant proportion of prey being consumed prior to satiation, with predator's prey consumption rate increasing linearly with prey density until satiation.

<p>Results in a constant proportion of prey being consumed prior to satiation, with predator's prey consumption rate increasing linearly with prey density until satiation.</p>
10
New cards

II response

Results in a decreasing proportion of prey being consumed as the predator's rate of prey consumption begins to slow as prey density increases and then plateaus when satiation occurs.

<p>Results in a decreasing proportion of prey being consumed as the predator's rate of prey consumption begins to slow as prey density increases and then plateaus when satiation occurs.</p>
11
New cards

III response

Predator exhibits low prey consumption under low prey densities, rapid consumption under moderate prey densities, and slowing prey consumption under high densities, forming an S curve.

12
New cards

Functional response vs. numerical response

Functional response describes how one predator changes its rate of prey consumption as prey density increases, while numerical response describes how the number of predators in an area changes as prey density increases.

<p>Functional response describes how one predator changes its rate of prey consumption as prey density increases, while numerical response describes how the number of predators in an area changes as prey density increases.</p>
13
New cards

Lotka-Volterra model

Model of predator-prey interactions that incorporates oscillations in the abundances of predator and prey, foundational for understanding these dynamics.

14
New cards

Prey population (N)

The population of prey in the Lotka-Volterra model.

15
New cards

Predator population (P)

The population of predators in the Lotka-Volterra model.

16
New cards

Prey growth

Prey grows exponentially unless eaten by predators.

17
New cards

Predator decline

Predators starve and decline when prey becomes scarce.

18
New cards

Prey recovery

With fewer predators, prey population recovers.

19
New cards

Cycle repeats

The cycle of predator and prey populations continues to oscillate.

20
New cards

Example of functional response

A wolf eats more deer when more deer are around.

21
New cards

Example of numerical response

More hawks move into a field full of mice as prey density increases.

22
New cards

Equilibrium Isocline

Population size of one species that causes the population of another species to be stable, aka zero growth isocline.

<p>Population size of one species that causes the population of another species to be stable, aka zero growth isocline.</p>
23
New cards

Joint Population Trajectory

Shows how predator and prey change over time, together.

24
New cards

Equilibrium Point

Shows where both species are at equilibrium isoclines at the same time, predator and prey population growth both equal zero.

25
New cards

Predation and Herbivory

Favor the evolution of defenses.

26
New cards

Behavioral Defenses

Examples include alarm calling, spatial avoidance, temporal avoidance, herding/flocking, thanatosis/playing dead, mobbing, distraction displays.

27
New cards

Crypsis

A physical defense, ability of an organism to blend into its environment, aka camouflage.

28
New cards

Structural Defenses

Built in, physical traits reducing chances of being attacked, such as spines/quills, shells, thick skin/scales, camouflage/crypsis, false eyes/warning shapes.

29
New cards

Warning Coloration

Aposematism; using bright/bold colors or patterns to signal predators of toxicity.

30
New cards

Batesian Mimicry

Palatable species evolve warning coloration that resembles unpalatable species, diluting the message of aposematism.

31
New cards

Mullerian Mimicry

When several unpalatable species evolve a similar pattern of warning coloration, reinforcing the message of aposematism.

32
New cards

Aggressive Mimicry

Predator/parasite mimics harmless/appealing organism to lure prey, e.g., orchid mantis.

33
New cards

Coevolution

When two or more species affect each other's evolution; the fitness of one organism affects the fitness of another.

34
New cards

Horizontal Transmission

Parasite moves between individuals other than parents and offspring, spreading quickly through populations.

35
New cards

Vertical Transmission

When a parasite is transmitted from parent to offspring during birth or reproduction.

36
New cards

Reservoir Hosts

Species that harbor parasites without severe symptoms, acting as a source of ongoing infection.

37
New cards

Vector

Living carriers, often insects, that transmit parasites between hosts.

38
New cards

Counterattacks

Parasite counterattacks by evolving resistance to immune responses, hiding inside host cells, changing surface proteins, or manipulating host behavior.

39
New cards

SIR Model

Simplest model of infectious disease transmission incorporating immunity.

40
New cards

Susceptible (S)

Individuals who can be infected.

41
New cards

Infected (I)

Individuals currently infected and infectious.

42
New cards

Recovered (R)

Individuals who recovered, are immune, or are dead.

43
New cards

Infection Dynamics

Susceptibles contact infected individuals, become infected; over time, infected individuals recover or die, reducing active infections.

44
New cards

Initial Infection Growth

When infection is introduced, there is an initial rapid growth in the number of infected individuals.

45
New cards

Population density

High density increases transmission risk.

46
New cards

Resistance

Reduces infection rate.

47
New cards

Tolerance

Reduces harm from infection but not infection rate.

48
New cards

Ectoparasite

Parasite that lives on the outside of an organism, e.g., lice.

49
New cards

Endoparasite

Parasite that lives inside an organism, e.g., prions, bacteria, protozoans.

50
New cards

Intraspecific competition

Competition within a species, e.g., male deer vs male deer.

51
New cards

Interspecific competition

Competition between different species, e.g., deer vs rabbit.

52
New cards

Resource

Anything an organism consumes or uses that causes an increase in the population growth rate when it becomes more available, such as water, food, light availability, and space.

53
New cards

Renewable resource

Resource that is constantly regenerated.

54
New cards

Nonrenewable resource

Resource that is not regenerated and is gone once used up.

55
New cards

Liebig's Law of the Minimum

Population increases until the supply of the most limiting resource prevents it from increasing further.

56
New cards

Competitive exclusion principle

Two species cannot coexist indefinitely when they are both limited by the same resource.

57
New cards

Logistic model

A model that describes how growth slows as population size approaches carrying capacity (K).

58
New cards

Population size (N)

The number of individuals in a population.

59
New cards

Intrinsic growth rate (r)

The rate at which a population increases in size under ideal conditions.

60
New cards

Carrying capacity (K)

The maximum population size that an environment can sustain.

61
New cards

Competitor equivalents

A measure of how many individuals of one species are equivalent to individuals of another species in terms of competition.

62
New cards

Competition coefficients

Weighted contributions of a competitor's population to how they affect the other species' carrying capacity.

63
New cards

Zero population growth isocline (ZNGI)

The line on a graph where the growth of a species is zero.

64
New cards

Lotka-Volterra model

A model that describes the dynamics of biological systems in which two species compete for the same resources.

65
New cards

Four possible outcomes of competition

1. Species 1 wins (competitive exclusion), 2. Species 2 wins (competitive exclusion), 3. Isoclines cross with species 1 winning depending on initial populations, 4. Coexistence occurs with isoclines crossing and intra greater than inter.

<p>1. Species 1 wins (competitive exclusion), 2. Species 2 wins (competitive exclusion), 3. Isoclines cross with species 1 winning depending on initial populations, 4. Coexistence occurs with isoclines crossing and intra greater than inter.</p>
66
New cards

Definite outcomes

Three of four possibilities have definite outcomes, while one outcome is contingent on various factors.

67
New cards

Initial population sizes

The initial population sizes of the two populations affect the outcome.

68
New cards

Initial carrying capacities

The initial carrying capacities of the two populations affect the outcome.

69
New cards

Competition coefficients

The competition coefficient value for a species would be higher if that species were a better competitor for the resource in question.

70
New cards

Lotka-Volterra Competition model

In the Lotka‐Volterra Competition model, carrying capacity for species-1 is determined by the number of individuals of species-1 and the number of individuals of species-2 (the competitor).

71
New cards

Carrying capacity for species-1

Carrying capacity for species-1 is reached when the reproductive rate of species-1 is zero (r1=0).

72
New cards

Carrying capacity and species-2

Carrying capacity for species-1 is reached when the reproductive rate of species-2 is zero (r2=0).

73
New cards

Competition coefficients concept

Competition coefficients convert the number of individuals between the two competing species into equivalents.

74
New cards

Abiotic conditions

Abiotic conditions such as temperature, moisture, and pH can favor one species over the other.

<p>Abiotic conditions such as temperature, moisture, and pH can favor one species over the other.</p>
75
New cards

Disturbances

Disturbances like fire, flood, and human activity can reduce the dominance of a strong competitor, allowing weaker competitors to persist or recover.

76
New cards

Predator-mediated coexistence

Predators may reduce the population of the dominant competitor and give less competitive species a chance.

77
New cards

Exploitative competition

Exploitative competition occurs when individuals consume and drive down the abundance of a resource to the point that other individuals cannot persist.

78
New cards

Interference competition

Interference competition occurs when competitors do not immediately consume resources but defend them, interacting with each other.

79
New cards

Allelopathy

Allelopathy is when organisms use chemicals to harm competitors.

80
New cards

Apparent competition

Apparent competition occurs when two species have a negative effect on each other through an enemy, including a predator, parasite, or herbivore.

<p>Apparent competition occurs when two species have a negative effect on each other through an enemy, including a predator, parasite, or herbivore.</p>
81
New cards

Mutualisms

Mutualisms can provide water, nutrients, and places to live for various species.

82
New cards

Mycorrhizal fungi

Mycorrhizal fungi attach to plant roots and help absorb water and minerals, while fungi get sugars from the plant.

83
New cards

Nitrogen-fixing bacteria

Nitrogen-fixing bacteria convert N2 gas into usable forms for plants, while bacteria get sugar and shelter.

84
New cards

Fungal partners in mycorrhizae

Fungal partners in mycorrhizae help plants access water in dry soils.

85
New cards

Ants and acacia trees

Acacia trees provide hollow thorns for ants to live in.

86
New cards

Mutualism

A symbiotic relationship where both species benefit.

87
New cards

Corals and zooxanthellae

Coral provides home, algae provides nutrients through photosynthesis.

88
New cards

Ants and acacia

Ants attack herbivores and plants that get too close to acacia.

89
New cards

Cleaner fish/shrimp

Eat parasites off bigger fish and get food/protection.

90
New cards

Fungi in grass tissues

Produce chemicals that turn herbivores away.

91
New cards

Pollination

Bees, butterflies, bats, birds visit flowers to collect nectar/pollen, transferring pollen between flowers.

92
New cards

Seed dispersal

Fruits eaten by animals pass through digestive systems and are dropped elsewhere with fertilizer.

93
New cards

Ants and seed dispersal

Ants carry seeds to nest, eat fatty parts, and leave seed to grow.

94
New cards

Fundamental niche

Mutualism can expand/limit fundamental niche; without mutualist, species might not be able to establish/persist in a habitat.

95
New cards

Keystone mutualisms

Pollinators/seed dispersers can affect plant abundance.

96
New cards

Community stabilization

Mutualism can stabilize communities by increasing reproduction and survival of species.

97
New cards

Energy flow and mutualism

Mutualism can impact energy flow, productivity, and nutrient cycling.

98
New cards

Antagonistic relationships

Mutualisms can turn antagonistic when conditions change.

99
New cards

Mycorrhizal fungi and plants

In nutrient poor soil, plant benefits greatly; in nutrient rich soil, fungi takes more carbon from plant than gives in nutrients.

100
New cards

Cheating in mutualism

Bees bite into sides of flowers to get nectar without pollinating.