Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
herbert spencer
the founding father of sociology in ENGLAND
grand philosopher
major works
Social statics (1851)
The Study of Sociology (1896)
Mid victorian england was an era far removed from
the dangers of revolution and violent upheaval.
The trials and tribulations that had marked the industrial revolution
was over
The industrial revolution in England, the very first one in the world was characterized by
division of labor, alienation, and economic change
Property relations changed from concrete __to __ (share of ownership).
land ; abstract
What did comte and spencer agreed upon?
all sciences rested on common philosophical foundations and could be brought together in a unified scheme
considered social phenomena operating as a system, domain or realm in nature
believed that the fundamental laws hich governed the natural world governed the social world
It was sociology for Comte and ___ for Spencer
evolution
all aspects of the universe are subject to the __ of evolution
laws
Spencer was very interested in evolutionary changes in social structures and institutions such as family, __, and military. which are the parts of a society
kinship
Spencer was a radiacal individualist and had to find a way of reconciling his ___ (social nominalism) with organicist approach.
individualism
spencer held as a general principle that “the properties of the units determine the properties of..
the aggregate."
The whole is the same as the sum of its
parts
Comte favored
“faire marcher” (intervention)
Spencer advocated
“laissez faire” (hands off)
Spencer considered that society must be free from the
meddling of governments and reformers
The states should be a ___ ___ which protects its citizens
nightwatchman state
organismic analogy
both grow in size
as they grow, they develop more complex, differentiated, structures (homogeneity → heterogeneity
develop more specialized functions
involved process of adjustment and adaptation to environment (equilibrium, survival of the fittest)
even though on unit is destroyed others live at least for a while (cultural arrangement)
differentiated parts are mutually dependent
on each other, thus promoting integration
amoeba - primitive society
human - industrial society
factors of societal growth
population increase
union of groups
salvage selfishness
Spencer considered that humans are unfit for cooperation
union of groups
the joining of previously unrelated units
spencer attempted to classify types of societies in terms of their evolutionary stages. what are they?
simple, com9pound, doubly compound, and trebly compound (classification according to degrees of structural complexity)
militant societies
characterized by compulsory cooperation and exist of conflict with the outside world
industrial societies
characterized by voluntary cooperation and peaceful prediction
unit of analysis
social nomialism
spencer contends that the properties of the units (individuals) determine the properties of the aggregate. units of society alone exist
distinctive analogy
organismic analogy (struggle for existence & survival of the fittest)
method
comparative method (methodological atomism)
rate of change
slow, gradual, step-by-step, and small amounts of increments
Directionality
multilinear ; particular societies might retrogress as well as progress. societies develop in response to their social and natural environment
modus operandi
natural, necessary, internal, and external (threat by nearby society)
compound societies
2 simple societies getting together
possibly peaceful or confrontational (usually about expansion)
predominantly settled, agricultural societies
division of 4 or 5 social strata in an organized priestly group
doubly compound societies
completely settled more integrated, more larger, and definite political structure, religious hierarchy, a more or less caste system , division of labor
treblely compound
increased overall size
complexity
division of labor
differentiation
population density
integration
cultural complex
simple societies
predominantly small
nomadic
lacking in leadership structure
low degree of differentiation
specialization
integration
no division of labor