1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
bible - EVANGELICAL PROTESTANTS
all scripture inspired by god so can be useful for teaching, reproof and correction
inerrant (w/o error) because inspired (god-breathed) by god
god dictated books and inspired authors to express his word in their own writing so TF should be taken literally
bible - CATHOLICS
bible inspired by god
church equal authority to bible bc bound together
magisterium and bishops interpret meaning and give new insights
scripture (speech of god) and tradition (active word of god) from same divine source to share same divine auth
must safeguard against private interpretation
tradition is living - new truths may be discovered as there may have been previous translation errors so must make sure interpretations are incorrect
bible - NEO ORTHODOXY
e.g. K. Barth and Tillick
reject inerrancy as there are many historical and scientific errors and some parts simply not true
not ‘word’ but contains word of god
scripture is a vehicle to experience god - personally meaningful so authoritative to individual
bible - LIBERALISM
reject bible as literally true
T Wright - like a play, must complete final scene
SOCIAL GOSPEL MOVEMENT - use christian and ethical principles to address social issues, bible has auth but social action more important
PROCESS THEO - rejects bible as factual, entirely human doc, inspired as may be found uplifting
church - CATHOLICS
apostolic tradition - stems from jesus’ apostles and his command to preach the gospels to all men - done orally, in writing nd by those associated w/ them - carried on to
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION - apostkes appointed bishops as successors, establishing a continuous line o succession and authority
holy spirit remains active in change
‘rule of faith’ is to embrace both scripture and tradition
church - PROTESTANTS
REJECT auth of church
relies on sola scriptura developed by martin luther during reformation - denied that scripture and church same
‘the sure rule of gods word’
shouldnt follow any other guidance
church in line with bible, all believers have equal access to god, can interpret bible and question truths
canon
books believed by the leaders of the early christian church to be inpired by god and TF authoritative
testament
agreement/ covenant
general revelation vs special revelation
GENERAL - the way in which god makes himself known to people through nature, reason and conscience
SPECIAL - the way in which god makes himself known in specific ways e.g. bible
nature of the bible - OLD TESTAMENT
firsts section - genesis
similar to hebrew bible with origins in ancient judaism
biography, narration, poetry, philosophy, psalms, proverbs, prophecy
nature of bible - NEW TESTAMENT
jesus’ life as messiah, fulfillment of prophecies
gospels matthew mark luke and john
pauls efforts to spread jesus’ teachings
27 books og in greek
gospels
oral trad of church
matthew mark luke and john 70-100ad
contradict each other and give different stories
nature of bible - BOOKS OF REVELATION
final book
apocalyptic literature predicting a final celestial war through prophecy
95ad on an island off coast of turkey
some believe less of prophecy, more of response to roman destruction of great temple and jerusalem
evangelical christians use to interpret current events in an expectation of end times
nature of bible - GNOSTIC GOSPELS
additional biblical texts e.g. gospel of mary 1896
50 by 1945
incl. gospel of thomas, previously hidden sayings and implies jesus and mary m marriage
book of jesus - secret convos
not official biblical canon but alternative views and stories
nature of bible - KING JAMES BIBLE
most widely know bible 1611
called for complete restructure of the church - commissioned 1604
earlier versions corrupt
contemp. lang, common recognisable terms
introduced new words and phrases
bible = collection of books
2 parts
66 books
jesus’ auth as gods auth
miracles
‘i and the father are one’
part of trinity
fulfill prophecies
incarnation, ascension
nicene creed ‘begotten’ not made
‘word became flesh’
conquered death
matthew 5:38 - 48
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. 41 If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[b] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect
interpretation of matthew 5:38 - 48
do not resist an evil person
turn the other cheek - let them slap
hand over your coat
go with them two miles
give to the one who asks you and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow
love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you
be perfect
how should matthew 5:38-48 be taken?
literally e.g. all should be pacifist
key morals
parable
stating an ideal
biblical criticism - time/ content/ culture
no focus on action but rather intention
jesus as a role model
shouldnt fight violence with violence as this fuels the oppressors desires
retaliate, if needed, in love
protect neighbours over ourselves - be as unselfish as possible
wouldnt retaliate if secure in status