Nations University BRS 125: Exegesis of Hebrew Scriptures - Module 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/39

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:26 PM on 6/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

40 Terms

1
New cards

Q1. Of the four major historical covenants in the Old Testament following Noah, which individual was NOT involved?

Adam

2
New cards

Q2. By what principle is one justified, even in the context of biblical law?

Faith

3
New cards

Q3. Which of the following is NOT one of the Ten Commandments?

You shall love your neighbor as yourself

4
New cards

Q4. Biblical legal codes show the greatest similarities to ancient Near Eastern codes with respect to:

Form

5
New cards

Q5. Mark the correct statement.

Even though one is saved through faith in Christ, there are still restrictions on behavior in the New Covenant

6
New cards

Q6. Looking for parallels between biblical laws and ancient Near Eastern literature is:

Valuable when the reader is aware of similar extra-biblical material

7
New cards

Q7. Old Testament legal material:

Offers resources for contemporary worship and life

8
New cards

Q8. The literary context is important in explaining:

The law itself

9
New cards

Q9. NOT a sub-genre of Old Testament legal literature:

Myth

10
New cards

Q10. Laws in the Old Testament:

Have counterparts in ancient contemporary cultures

11
New cards

Q11. A genre-sensitive approach to Old Testament law:

Considers the many comparable collections of laws of the ancient Near East

12
New cards

Q12. Jesus condemned the Pharisees because they were:

Hypocrites

13
New cards

Q13. Israel would be:

A kingdom of priests and a holy nation

14
New cards

Q14. The nature of “law” is that by law one:

Becomes conscious of sin

15
New cards

Q15. Arrangement of legal material in the Old Testament:

Laws do not appear in neat type categories within the text

16
New cards

Q16. A covenant is best defined as:

A means of expressing and defining a relationship

17
New cards

Q17. The spirit of the law is best explained by:

Yahweh takes covenant commitments seriously and expects the same from Israel

18
New cards

Q18. Apodictic laws:

Begin with 'do' or 'do not'

19
New cards

Q19. How should legal genre be used?

It provides a framework of understanding

20
New cards

Q20. To show OT laws are binding today, one must show:

Biblical support

21
New cards

Q21. INCORRECT statement:

Mosaic law is arbitrary and oppressive

22
New cards

Q22. Israel’s response to covenant:

We will do everything the LORD has said

23
New cards

Q23. INCORRECT about covenant stipulations:

Each party may discontinue the covenant

24
New cards

Q24. When legal texts refer to the future:

Understand the passage in historical and literary context first

25
New cards

Q25. Law asserting right and wrong categorically:

Apodictic law

26
New cards

Q26. Christ’s mediation frees from sins committed:

Under the first covenant

27
New cards

Q27. Legal genre differs from historical genre because:

It carries the notion of an authoritative rule

28
New cards

Q28. Jesus indicted Pharisees for:

Teaching rules taught by men

29
New cards

Q29. Determining if Mosaic Law applies today:

It has been superseded by a new covenant incorporating some principles

30
New cards

Q30. Meaning of Jesus’ statement about Pharisees:

Follow their teaching of the Law, but not their hypocritical example

31
New cards

Q31. Debt-slave laws:

Illustrate the relational aspect of Mosaic law

32
New cards

Q32. Correct statement:

Ancient Near Eastern treaties provide background for biblical covenants

33
New cards

Q33. Casuistic law:

Deals case-by-case with situations

34
New cards

Q34. Biblical law is interpreted:

In keeping with a covenant

35
New cards

Q35. Correct statement:

Legal material defined the covenant people

36
New cards

Q36. Righteousness in Christ is:

Apart from law

37
New cards

Q37. Genre analysis of OT law:

Pays attention to social conditions and origins of laws

38
New cards

Q38. NOT necessary for covenant:

Equality of parties

39
New cards

Q39. Critical issue for Christians regarding OT law:

Exegesis—interpreting legal material to understand God’s righteousness

40
New cards

Q40. OT laws are not binding unless:

They are universal, eternal, and restated in the New Testament