STAT 509 Lesson 8: Sample Size and Power

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary terms and definitions related to sample size, statistical power, and design considerations for clinical trials, including means, proportions, survival analysis, and adjustments for multiplicity and adherence.

Last updated 2:31 PM on 8/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

30 Terms

1
New cards

Precision

The central theme of sample size calculation; refers to the closeness of an estimator to the true population value, often measured by confidence interval width.

2
New cards

Statistical Power

The probability that a hypothesis test will correctly reject the null hypothesis at a specified significance level (ฮฑ\alpha) for a clinically meaningful effect size.

3
New cards

z0.975z_{0.975}

The critical value approximately equal to 1.961.96; it is used for a two-sided test with ฮฑ=0.05\alpha=0.05.

4
New cards

z1โˆ’ฮฒz_{1-\beta}

The standard normal percentile corresponding to power (1โˆ’ฮฒ1-\beta); common values include 0.8420.842 for 80%80\% power and 1.2821.282 for 90%90\% power.

5
New cards

SAS PROBIT function

A function that generates standard normal percentiles; for example, PROBIT(0.99)\text{PROBIT}(0.99) yields approximately 2.332.33.

6
New cards

Treatment mechanism (TM) study

A study where sample size is typically not a major issue because many measurements are taken on a small number of subjects.

7
New cards

0 of 3 toxicity rule

A dose-escalation design rule where the next cohort is escalated to the next dose if none of the three subjects in the current cohort experience toxicity.

8
New cards

2 of 6 stopping rule

A design rule that terminates the study whenever at least two of six subjects at the same dose level experience the toxicity/effect.

9
New cards

Efficacy

The demonstration that a tested dose is effective at ameliorating the treated condition, a requirement for drug approval by the U.S. FDA.

10
New cards

Conservative planning value (pโˆ—p^*)

Using pโˆ—=0.5p^*=0.5 for sample size calculations because it maximizes the variance p(1โˆ’p)p(1-p), providing the largest/most conservative sample size (nn).

11
New cards

Quadratic precision relationship

The mathematical principle where the required sample size (nn) is proportional to 1/ฮ”21/\Delta^2, meaning halving the margin of error (ฮ”\Delta) requires four times as many subjects.

12
New cards

Exact binomial confidence interval

An interval that uses binomial probabilities rather than normal approximations; it is preferred when normal approximation adequacy is uncertain due to small sample size or extreme proportions.

13
New cards

Sample size for mean confidence interval

Calculated by the formula n=[z1โˆ’ฮฑ/2ร—ฯƒฮ”]2n = [\frac{z_{1-\alpha/2} \times \sigma}{\Delta}]^2, where ฮ”\Delta is the desired half-width and ฯƒ\sigma is the population standard deviation.

14
New cards

Comparative treatment efficacy (CTE) trial

A trial designed to compare independent treatment groups with respect to a primary clinical endpoint.

15
New cards

Allocation ratio (AR)

The ratio of treatment group sizes (AR=n1/n2AR = n_1/n_2); equal allocation is AR=1AR=1.

16
New cards

Effect size in SD units

Used in power calculations for means, defined as ฮ”/ฯƒ\Delta/\sigma, where ฮ”\Delta is the treatment difference and ฯƒ\sigma is the common standard deviation.

17
New cards

PROC POWER

The SAS procedure used for power and sample-size calculations for continuous, binary, and survival outcomes.

18
New cards

Hazard rate (h(t)h(t))

The instantaneous risk of an event at time tt, conditional on the subject surviving event-free up to that time.

19
New cards

Hazard ratio (ฮ›\Lambda)

The ratio of two treatment-group hazard functions, assumed to be constant over time under proportional hazards.

20
New cards

Logrank total number of events (EE)

The primary quantity driving sample size for survival studies; for equal allocation, E=4ร—[z1โˆ’ฮฑ/2+z1โˆ’ฮฒlnโก(ฮ›)]2E = 4 \times [\frac{z_{1-\alpha/2} + z_{1-\beta}}{\ln(\Lambda)}]^2.

21
New cards

Expanded Safety (ES) trial

A Phase IV study specifically designed to estimate the frequency of uncommon adverse events that may have gone undetected in earlier phases.

22
New cards

Poisson rare-event model

A model where the probability of observing exactly dd events among mm subjects with rate ฮป\lambda is P(D=d)=expโก(โˆ’mร—ฮป)ร—(mร—ฮป)dd!P(D=d) = \frac{\exp(-m \times \lambda) \times (m \times \lambda)^d}{d!}.

23
New cards

Detection probability (ฮณ\gamma)

The target probability of detecting at least one rare event, used to determine cohort size mโ‰ฅโˆ’lnโก(1โˆ’ฮณ)ฮปm \ge \frac{-\ln(1-\gamma)}{\lambda}.

24
New cards

Bonferroni correction

A multiplicity adjustment for KK primary comparisons where each is tested at ฮฑ/K\alpha/K to control the overall false-positive rate.

25
New cards

Composite endpoint

A single statistical endpoint constructed from multiple clinical events (e.g., time to stroke, MI, or death) that does not require multiplicity adjustment.

26
New cards

Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis

An analysis principle where subjects are compared according to their originally randomized group, regardless of adherence, discontinuation, or adding other therapies.

27
New cards

Therapeutic dropout

A participant assigned to the active therapy arm who stops taking that therapy but may continue to provide data.

28
New cards

Drop-in

A participant assigned to the placebo arm who adds or switches to an active therapy.

29
New cards

Nonadherence adjustment formula

A method to increase sample size based on a dilution factor: Nโˆ—=N/(1โˆ’d1โˆ’d0)2N^* = N / (1-d_1-d_0)^2, where d1d_1 and d0d_0 are discontinuation and drop-in rates.

30
New cards

Withdrawal adjustment formula

Calculated as Nadjusted=N/(1โˆ’W)N_{\text{adjusted}} = N / (1-W), where WW is the anticipated proportion of subjects leaving the study before providing key outcome data.