International Organizations (I.O.s) and Power in Global Governance

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

How do Realists view International Organizations (I.O.s)?

As tools of powerful states that prioritize sovereignty and relative gains over multilateralism. Example: NATO as a U.S. tool during the Cold War.

2
New cards

What are relative gains in international relations?

States prioritize their own gains over mutual benefits in cooperation, fearing that allies may become future threats.

3
New cards

What is the Security Dilemma?

A situation where states’ efforts to enhance security (e.g., through military buildup) trigger fear and competition among other states.

4
New cards

What does Neo-Liberal Institutionalism argue about I.O.s?

That I.O.s reduce transaction costs, facilitate cooperation, and mitigate anarchy through repeated interactions (e.g., Shadow of the Future).

5
New cards

What is the “Shadow of the Future”?

The idea that repeated interactions reduce the likelihood of defection in cooperation (e.g., Prisoner’s Dilemma).

6
New cards

How does Critical Theory view I.O.s?

As perpetuating global inequalities by maintaining capitalist hegemony and core-periphery dynamics.

7
New cards

What are core-periphery dynamics?

Global inequalities where core countries (e.g., U.S., EU) dominate peripheral countries (e.g., Global South) economically and politically.

8
New cards

How do Constructivists view power in I.O.s?

As multifaceted, including compulsory, institutional, structural, and productive forms that shape norms and state behavior.

9
New cards

What is compulsory power?

Direct control exercised by one actor over another (e.g., military force or economic sanctions).

10
New cards

What is institutional power?

Indirect control through rules and institutions that shape long-term advantages for some actors and disadvantages for others.

11
New cards

What is structural power?

Power dynamics based on positioning in global systems (e.g., core vs. periphery countries).

12
New cards

What is productive power?

The ability to shape social norms, identities, and knowledge (e.g., labeling groups as “terrorists” or “civilized”).

13
New cards

How does NATO exemplify Realist views of I.O.s?

As a tool for U.S. security during the Cold War, prioritizing American interests and relative gains.

14
New cards

How does the IMF reflect Neo-Liberal Institutionalism?

By advancing neoliberal policies under the guise of objectivity and science, reducing transaction costs for global economic cooperation.

15
New cards

What are the four faces of power according to Barnett and Duvall?

Compulsory, institutional, structural, and productive power.

16
New cards

How can resistance manifest in global governance?

Through compulsory (rejecting unipolarity), institutional (changing rules), structural (solidarity networks), and productive (decolonization) forms.

17
New cards

What is hegemony in international relations?

Dominance by powerful states or groups, maintained through economic, military, and ideational power.

18
New cards

How does the Prisoner’s Dilemma apply to I.O.s?

It illustrates the challenges of cooperation and defection in an anarchic system, mitigated by repeated interactions (Shadow of the Future).

19
New cards

Give an example of productive power.

Labeling groups as “terrorists” or “civilized” to shape global perceptions and norms.

20
New cards

Why do Realists argue NATO remains relevant?

As a deterrent against Russian aggression and a tool for U.S. strategic interests, despite the end of the Cold War.