Loopholes Logic Reasoning CH1 - CH 2

5.0(1)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards

optional elements

specifiers, can be taken out and make grammatical sense

2
New cards

core elements

needed to make grammatical sense (verb + noun)

3
New cards

commas

something on either side is an optional element

4
New cards

steps to translate stimulus

  1. recognizing clusters

  2. Commas

  3. translate in parts

  4. translate everything

5
New cards

Specifiers

who, after, since, for, by if, as, in, around, because, on, between, which, of, until, although, in addition to, while, that,

6
New cards
What does CLIR stand for

Controversy, Loophole, Inference, Resolution

7
New cards
debate > controversy
8
New cards
Argument > loophole
9
New cards
premise set > inference
10
New cards
paradox > resolution
11
New cards

argument

premise + conclusion and examine the relationship between the two

12
New cards

premise

supports the conclusion (evidence)

13
New cards

conclusion

relies on premise (claim)

14
New cards

premise indicators

because, far, since, as, given that

15
New cards

conclusion indicators

therefore, accordingly, consequently, so, thus, hence, it follows that

16
New cards

valid conclusion

must be true, presented as part of the argument

17
New cards

interlocking

point of similarity

18
New cards

inferences

a valid conclusion you draw yourself, not inside an argument

19
New cards

loopholes

bring attention to specific situations where the conclusion falls apart

20
New cards

intermediate conclusion

claim to support the main claim and helps prove it, still needs suppor

21
New cards

nested claim

someone besides the author makes a claim, A description of how someone believes something

22
New cards

hybrid augment

when the stimulus is only premise and nested claim, you then critique (find support) for the nested claim