1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Linnaean Classification System
Organisms are grouped into hierarchies
Still used today but w less emphasis
Kings Play Cards On Fat Green Stools
Binomial Nomenclature
Scientific names for species
always italicized or underlined
2 parts
Genus → can NOT be reused
species epithet → can be reused for other genuses
we don’t have enough taxonomic levels to show ALL relationships
or over-generalize by placing all organisms into one group → eliminates relationships
BPQ
What are some of the problems w the Linnaean Classification system?
Taxonomy
process of naming and classifying organisms
based on phylogeny
loosely fit into Linnaean classification
Monophyletic Group
consists of 1 common ancestor and all the descendants
good taxonomic names are ones that are monophyletic
Paraphyletic group
Consists of 1 common ancestor but is missing some descendants
Polyphyletic group
consists of distantly related organisms
Paraphyletic
BPQ
Think about what you consider a fish
Are fish monophyletic, paraphyletic, or polyphyletic?
Cladistics
a sound method for developing hypothesis of evolutionary relationships
ALL phylogeny are hypotheses
Cladistics is NOT just based on organisms looking similar
Cladistics requirements
Informative characters (traits)
Parsimony
Characters
Synapomorphies
Plesiomorphies
Autapomorphies
Synapomorphies
shared derived (new) characters
Informative
Plesiomorphies
shared ancestral (old) characters
Uninformative
Autapomorphies
unshared derived (new) characters
uninformative
Outgroup
distantly related group that is used to distinguish synapomorphies from plesiomorphies
without an outgroup, we dont know which traits are synapomorphies and which are plesiomorphies
presence (1) or absence (0) of a trait are arbitrary
If outgroup has the trait, it is considered a Plesiomorphy
evolved before the ingroup did
Looking like a lizard is a plesiomorphy (uninformative) bc all amniotes looked like lizards
BPQ
how can we explain how crocs can be more closely related to birds even tho they look more like lizards?
AP way to make a phylogeny
group by similarities
Parsimony Analysis
assumption = evolutionary change
phylogeny w least number of evolutionary changes is probably the correct one
Character Matrix
columns: characters/traits
rows: organisms/taxa
1: presence of trait
0: absence of trait
Ingroup: Organisms/taxa being studied
Outgroup: distant relative
used to determine synapomorphy/plesiomorphy
not shown in picture
all the traits listed on the slide are not informative
human’s traits are autapomorphies
chimps, gorillas, orangutan traits are plesiomorphies
BPQ
how is it possible chimps are more closely related to humans?
Homoplasy
shared characters NOT due to common ancestry
Goal of cladistics
maximize homology
minimize homoplasy
homoplasies require extra evolutionary steps
Competing Hypotheses
different sets of data can create multiple phylogenies
many problems in phylogenetics are still unresolved
All phylogenies are hypotheses
phylogenies are often reassessed as new data comes in
each tree is arranged differently, but have the SAME relationships
BPQ What is the difference in relationships between the following phylogenies?
Tree Topology
nodes on a tree can rotate without changing relationships
Polytomy
Polytomy
an unresolved tree - when there is more than one most parsimonious solution, so a node splits into 3+ branches
Hard Polytomy - Results from actual evolutionary processes that happened (real)
Soft Polytomy - Results from bad data/not enough data (not real)
Taxonomic Definitions
3 ways to define a taxonomic group (clade)
Apomorphy-based Clade
Node-based Clade
Stem-based Clade
Apomorphy-based clade
the first ancestor to evolve a synapomorphy and all of its descendants
Node-based clade
the most recent common ancestor of two taxa and all of its descendants
when both taxa are extant, it is called a crown clade
Stem-based Clade
all organisms more closely related to one taxa than to another
Character Optimization
placing characters on phylogenies in a way to yield the most parsimonious evolution
Process
If the outgroup is 1, place that character at the root
Add characters to the tree use the least number of steps
Use (-) in front of a character to show loss of the character
DELTRAN optimization
delayed optimization
prioritizes convergent evolution
in phylogeny, draw the trait evolving twice
only equally parsimonious to ACCTRAN during polytomy
ACCTRAN optimization
accelerated optimization
prioritizes losses or reversals
in phylogeny, draw trait evolving and then being lost
only equally parsimonious to DELTRAN during polytomy