1/57
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Phone
A single sound
Contrast (contrastive distribution)
same environments; difference in meaning
Complementary distribution
distinct environments
Free variation
same environments; no difference in meaning
Phoneme
What each contrastive phone in a language belongs to
Allophones
Phones in complementary distribution or free variation which belong to the same phoneme
Locality
we want conditioning environments to be local (eg. ideally adjacent to the segment)
Naturalness
Implies typological abundance
Neutralization
Two phones that used to contrast in a certain phonological position no longer contrast
Abstractness
a UR form is considered to be sufficiently “concrete” as long as for each segment in the UR, there is some context in which that segment surfaces intact
Major class features
consonantal (obstruction of vocal tract), sonorant (vocal tract open), syllabic (nucleus of a syllable)
Manner features
continuant (without closure in oral cavity), delayed release, lateral, nasal, ATR
Place features
labial, coronal (tongue blade/front of tongue), anterior (on or in front of alveolar ridge), distributed (whole tongue blade)
Laryngeal features
Voice, spread glottis, constricted glottis
Natural classes
Two (or more) segments constitute this when they share a given set of phonetic features to the exclusion of all other sounds in the language
Given two rules A and B, where A is ordered before B:
Feeding
the application of rule A creates an environment for the application of rule B
Given two rules A and B, where A is ordered before B:
Counterfeeding
Had B applied before rule A, the application of B would have fed A
Given two rules A and B, where A is ordered before B:
Bleeding
The application of rule A destroys an environment for the application of rule B
Given two rules A and B, where A is ordered before B:
Counterbleeding
Had B applied before A, the application of B would have bled A
Autosegmental phonology
This theory divides the representation of each segment into two parts: the usual feature matrix and the timing tear to which feature bundles are linked.
Timing tier
A sequence of units representing schematically the temporal manifestation of the string
Association lines
link segments between the timing tear and the melodic tier
Stray erasure
When something is left unlinked and then delted
Well-formedness conditions
Association lines cannot cross. All vowels must (eventually) bear some tone, and all tones must be borne by some vowel
Ghosts
Empty timing slots lacking a segmental association
Compensatory lengthening
The lengthening of a vowel sound that happens upon the loss of a following consonant
Pitch accent languages
Have only one syllable with assigned tone per word (typically the stressed syllable)
Intonational langauges
Do not use pitch contrastively
Tone-bearing unit (TBU)
What is allowed to link to a tone in an autosegmental representation
General tone association rules
left-to-right association and spreading
Tone stability
The deletion of a vowel does not result in the deletion of the tone borne by the vowel
Floating tones
Tones not associated with a TBU
Downstep
Phenomenon whereby a tone known to be H is realized lower than a preceding H. The L is floating, not linked.
Downdrift
Process whereby a L tone lowers the register (pitch range) in which following H tones are realized. The L is linked, not floating.
Twin Sister Convention
adjacent identical tones on one TBU are automatically simplified into one
Obligatory Contour Principle
At the melodic level, adjacent identical elements are prohibited. No two of the same tones in a row.
Derivational framework
SPE-style where SR is created from rewrite rules applying to UR. Rules apply sequentially
Non-derivational framework
Optimality theory. Constraints on the well-formedness of SR, evaluation happens all at once
Onset
The consonant sound or sounds at the beginning of a syllable, occurring before the nucleus
Nucleus
Middle of a syllable (usually a vowel)
Coda
The consonants of a syllable that follow the nucleus
Rhyme
Nucleus and coda together
CV
Maximally unmarked syllable structure
Sonority Hierarchy
vowels > glides > liquids > nasals > fricatives > stops
Sonority Sequencing Principle
Between any member of a syllable and the syllable peak, a sonority rise or plateau must occur
Light vs. heavy syllables
CV is always light, CVV is always heavy, and CVC is language specific
Weight-by-position (WSP)
Rule applying in languages in which CVC syllables are heavy
Stress
Phonological organizing principle without consistent phonetic correlates
Trochee
Left-dominant (x .)
Iamb
Right-dominant (. x)
Dominance
Determines the side of the foot where the head is located
Directionality
Determines the direction in which foot construction scans the stress domain
Boundedness
bounded stress rules build maximally binary stress feet, while unbounded languages put no upper limit on the size of a foot
Quantity-sensitivity
Governs the distribution of light and heavy syllables in terminal nodes of feet
Prosodic preferences
Infants are born with this from their ambient language environment
Neural commitment
Acoustic specialization to the sounds of a language. Infants learn their phonemes and phonotactics around 6-12 months, corresponding to babbling and first words
Transitional probabilities
How babies learn phonotactics and word boundaries
Common child phonology processes
Simplification (CV structure preferred), substitution, harmony (esp consonant harmony, rare in adult phonology), long-distance metathesis, consonant fusion, chain-shifts