Lee et al. (1997) Study on Cross-Cultural Moral Reasoning in Children

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/13

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key concepts from the Lee et al. (1997) study on cross-cultural differences in children's moral reasoning.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

What was the aim of Lee et al. (1997) study?

To investigate cross-cultural differences in children's moral reasoning about lying and truth-telling.

2
New cards

What cultural groups were compared in the study by Lee et al. (1997)?

Chinese and Canadian children.

3
New cards

What was the significance of the research conducted by Lee et al. (1997)?

It highlights how cultural norms and moral values influence cognitive and social development.

4
New cards

What type of study design was used in Lee et al. (1997)?

Quasi-experiment with a cross-cultural design.

5
New cards

What were the independent variables in the study?

Cultural group (Chinese or Canadian), type of story (pro-social or anti-social), and type of behavior (truth-telling or lying).

6
New cards

How were the children's moral evaluations rated in the study?

Using a 7-point scale ranging from very, very good to very, very naughty.

7
New cards

What were the results concerning pro-social situations in the study?

Chinese children rated lying more positively as they aged, while Canadian children consistently rated truth-telling more positively.

8
New cards

How did developmental trends manifest in the evaluation of moral reasoning?

Younger children rated truth-telling more positively, while older Chinese children rated pro-social lying positively.

9
New cards

What does the conclusion of the study suggest about moral reasoning?

Moral reasoning is influenced by cultural norms, and children's moral development evolves with age.

10
New cards

What strengths were identified in the study?

Cross-cultural perspective, standardized procedure, and developmental insights.

11
New cards

What weaknesses were noted in Lee et al. (1997) study?

Ethnocentric bias, artificial scenarios, and a simplistic rating scale.

12
New cards

What application does the study have for educational settings?

Understanding cultural differences in moral reasoning can inform teaching strategies and conflict resolution.

13
New cards

What role do cultural values play according to the study?

Cultural values shape children's development and moral reasoning in multicultural contexts.

14
New cards

What major contribution does Lee et al. (1997) make to psychology?

It shows the interaction between universal cognitive processes and culturally specific values in moral reasoning.