1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Pluralist Theory
Most people not interested in politics
Theory driven by people entering and exiting political stratum through interest groups
People enter into pressure system
Organized groups drive political change, not individual people
People can easily get involved
Group formation is easy
Competition between groups is necessary
Allows diverse ideas to be heard
Creates deliberation with policymakers
Participatory Democratic Theory
Politics/Policy based on mass opinon/action
Individuals don’t get more or less involved
Politics change based on mass opinion
Interest groups only matter when backed by public opinion
Effective linkage between mass opinion and policymaking process
Wisdom of the crowd, median voter theory
Mitigation of mob rule/tyranny
Somtimes works in Republican society if it allows direct participation
Elite Democratic Theory
Small stratum of wealthy/powerful
Political change driven by elite
Policy outcomes reflect desires of elites
Highly educated rule
Decisions typically preserve order and stability which allows them to perpetuate their position
Benevolent elites can help pursue a common good
NOT A CONSPIRACY
Thomas Hobbes
Wrote Leviathan, explored social contract
Legitimacy of government established by consent of the governed
Government has singular purpose endorsed by people
Government protects security of people who would be otherwise vulnerable
People give up some freedom to get security
Suggested government protects people from themselves
John Locke
People are rational and reasonable
People know their rights to life, liberty, and property, and know others have those rights
Natural Law: Protect your own natural rights, and protect others when possible
Somtimes hard to remember others have natural rights
Because people are unstable, social contract created to protect us from infringing on others natural rights, but only how we allow it to
Social Contract/Government created to solve disputes and protect people
Government can only do what people let it
Popular sovereignty important to legitimacy
If government steps out of line, they lose legitimacy
People must overthrow government if it can’t regain legitimacy
Consent of the governed tied to right to vote
Republicanism
Framers interested in it from Rome
Provided common knowledge for framers
Classical and enlightenment thinking blended
Classical Theory
Civic virtue necessary to sacrifice personal interests for community interests
Easier in smaller, homogeneous communities, people know each other better
Republican Citizenship
Sacrifices of time and energy, necessary to improve communities
Maintains democracy
English Republicanism
Education and understanding of natural rights creates less corruption
Colonial Governments
Colonies and states had local representative assemblies
Consentof individuals and local communities emphasized
Consent to states, not federal government
Basis of federalism
US needs a system that would perpetuate self-government and autonomy
State Governments
Experimentation early
Early precedent for checks and balances set
Constitutional Applications
Article 1 Section 8 enumerates powers of federal government (federalism, separation of powers, limited government)
House and Senate Structure (civic virtue, republicanism, social contract, consent of the government
Democratic Model Applications
Congressmembers wealthy and powerful (elite theory)
IG’s compete (pluralist theory)
BLM/Organized Protest (participatory theory)
Articles of Confederation
US had been in crisis
2nd Continental Congress used to govern
Not very stable (moved around a lot, relied on all states, constantly under threat)
Solidified precedents set by 2nd Continental congress
Treaties and Fiscal Policy solidified
Finance becomes government responsibility
Structure of Articles
Citizens mostly belonged to states, not central government
Citizens vote for state legislature/local government
State legislature sends delegates to unicameral Congress
Each state got one vote, but could send multiple delegates
Could lay taxes, create and army, make treaties
Two committes - one to manage federal government, the other to administer federal powers in states
Issues
No formal executive branch
Law administration had to be approved by state governors
State courts/judges inclined to help state
Congress very responsive to states
Delegates had short terms
Difficult to install long-term policy
“Firm Friendship” of states (very decentralized)
Unanimous vote needed to amend
1780’s
Articles government wanted money from states
Government didn’t have money
Disunity
Native Americans/Outside Powers took advantage
Shay’s Rebellion
Soldiers didn’t get pension because government didn’t have money
Soldiers couldn’t pay taxes, rebelled
Articles government did nothing
Drove discussion at Philadelphia Convention
Philadelphia Convention
No discussion allowed outside
Each state gets one vote
Subcommittee system (complex issues tackled by small groups)
No decision final
Open-ended
No one opposed to federal power recruited
Representation of States and People
Constitutional Government directly represents people
Under Articles, citizens vote for state legislature, who votes for delegates
Under Constitution, each citizen votes for member of national legislature
Popular sovereignty in national legislature established
Great Compromise
Between Virginia Plan (direct representation) and New Jersey Plan (articles system)
HOR: Proportional and Direct
Senate: Not proportional and indirect
Shorter terms in lower house (HOR) and longer terms in upper house (Senate)
Different powers for each house
Enslaved Representation and Taxation
South wants enslaved counted for representation but not taxation
North vice versa
3/5ths Clause: Every 5 enslaved people, three count for representation/taxation
Representation tied to taxation
NOT about human rights
Control over slave trade left to states
State/Federal Power and Sovereignty
Two sovereigns
Federalism
Federal government only in its sphere
Federal government supreme in its sphere
Separate spheres for federal and sovereignty
Interpolation, Adjudication, Amendment
Constitution needs stability and mutuability
Amendment proposed through supermajority in both houses
¾ vote required in states
Difficult to amend
Invisible/Unwritten constitution (implied regulation, more eacily changed)
Citizenship
Constitution doesn’t solve
Federal government can dictate naturalizations
Stipulations around citizenship
14th amendment changes this
Amendment Process and National Parties
Reflects problems with Articles
Many ideas for new amendments
Parties prevent ¾ of the states from ratifying new amendments despite national support
Power and Centralization
Debates over whether centralized government can use necessary power
Worries about terrorist attacks and international stability
Do crises justify intervention?
Federalism
Balance between federal and state power
Enumerated Powers
Powers given solely to the federal government
Article 1 Section 8
Development of Navy
Regulation of interstate commerce
Patents + Copyright
Denied Powers
Powers denied to the federal and state governments
Article 1 Section 9 + 10
Concurrent Powers
Powers both have at the same time
Can occur as long as on government’s exercise of pwoer doesn’t impede another’s
Taxation (both governments tax, taxes added on top of each other)
Reserved Powers
Powers given solely to the state governments
10th amendment (non-enumerated, non-denied powers reserved to states)
Licensure
Understood to be controlled by states through 10th amendment
Federal government has been trying to control recently
Supremacy Clause
Laws must concur with higher laws
Constitution is supreme
Federal laws are next and must obey Constitution
Constitution > Federal Laws > Treaties/Acts of Congress > State Constitutions > State laws/statutes > local ordinances
Acts of federal agencies are equal to treaties/acts of Congress
Necessary and Proper Clause
Congress can effectuate any laws that are necessary to carry out its powers
Not a blank slate
Article 1 Section 8
Subject to Supremacy Clause
Commerce Clause
Congress can regulate commerce with foreign nations and between the states
What counts as interstate commerce is controversial
Led to many SC cases
State Mutuality and Sovereignty Clause
All states are equal (none have authority over others)
States can’t limit rights of US citizens
States can’t control borders
Horizontal Federalism
Pre-Emption Doctrine
Occurs when state and federal laws contradict
Field pre-emption
Federally exclusive areas
Occurs when state laws interfere too much, it is impracticable
Conflict pre-emption
As long as state and federal law don’t contradict too much, can coexist
Fiscal Federalism
Federal government gives state governments money to implement policy
Federal government can withhold money to incentivize state governments
Grants-in-aid used to give money to state governments
Some state programs are reliant on federal funding
Block Grants
Single chunks of money allocated based on available funds, not calculation
Formula Grants
States must qualify for money
Use annually reached calculations to determine how much each state needs
Project Grants
Given to individuals/corporations directly
Must applys
Government uses these to produce specific impacts
Evaluated and renewed based on success
New Deal
Marks big change in federalism
Before, individual grants came from state/local governments
After, federal government gives grants directly to individuals
New systems of collaboration between federal government and state government created
Tennessee Valley Association (TVA)
Created jobs and improved infrastructure in Tennessee Valley
Federal government gets to control more things
National Minimum Wage floor established
Conflict pre-emption
Great Society
Huge swath of programs initiated by Lyndon B. Johnson
More cooperation between federal government and state governments
More fiscal federalism
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
Federal government allocated money directly to schools based on poverty level
Medicaid
Run by state governments
Federal government matches state government contributions
State runs programs, federal government regulates
Block grants given to state governments for programs
Cross-Cutting Sanctions
Used to convince states to follow federal regulation by threatening to take funding away across multiple fields
Crossover Sanctions
Used to convince states to follow federal regulation by threatening to take funding away in the same field as the regulation
1980’s-1990’s
Devolution
More power to state governments through fiscal federalism
Move freedom to states, less coercion through fiscal federalism
AFDC-TANF
AFDC had strict federal rules on welfare checks
TANF allows states to design welfare programs
Different states put different requirements on welfare
Example of devolution
Post-2008
Polarized federalism
States become associated with ideology
ACA
Republican states sued after passage
Democratic states defended Obama
Republican states didn’t use extra ACA funding
Democratic states added a bunch of funding to welfare programs
Policy examples of Federalism
CHIP
Children’s Health Insurance
Federal government expands healthcare
DOMA
Allowed states not to recognize marriages in other states
Same-sex couples denied regulation, led to lawsuits
No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Students had to meet education standards for the state government to continue receiving benefits
Fiscal federalism
Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
State governments had to replace voting machines, get benefits
Didn’t get much federal aid to do so (major trend)
Clean Power Plan
Obama gives each state a target for carbon emissions
Each state has to create a plan which the federal government would help with financially
Shot down, but good example of federalism
College
Required to be accredited
Msut ensure all universities are up to par with national regulations
14th Amendment
Fundamentally changed federalism
Clear definition of national citizenship, distinction drawn between national and state citizenship
Federal citizenship definite, state depends on residence
States can’t make laws that restrict rights of federal citizens
Fundamental rights can’t be taken away without due process
Equal protection of the laws
Federal government has power to limit state governments
Expanded Bill of Rights to states (incorporation)
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
National Bank created, branch in each state
Maryland had heavily taxed its branch of the national bank, almost bankrupting it
Question over whether Congress can create a bank and whether Maryland can regulate it
Ruled bank was Constitutional and could not be limited by states
US v. Lopez (1995)
Congress passed law forbidding guns in schools
Controlled k-12 education and community safety, often seen as state domains
State governments didn’t stop the act (acknowledged supremacy clause)
Individual sued and won, claiming implied powers were too loosely related.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Congress had allowed an individual control over a waterway
State of NY allowed another individual to have control
US uses commerce clause, wins
First time using commerce clause
US v. EC Knight, Hammer v. Dagenheart, Carter v. Carter Coal
Limits on trusts and child labor from federal government
Companies sued, claiming it was outside of commerce clause
Supreme Court sided with corporations, said moral regulation of companies left to state government
More skepticism of use of commerce clause nad N+P during late 1800s
Wickard v. Filburn, Jones v. NLRB, US v. Darby Lumber
New Deal laws limited corporations
Corporations sued but lost
Big shift from late 1800’s to early 1900s
Katenbach v. McClug, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US
CRA era politics used commerce clause to restrict private segregation
Businesses sued
Court sided with CRA
Fiscal Federalism (sanctions/incentives)
US v. Morrison (2000)
Violence against women act (VAWA) allowed women to appeal domestic violence and rape cases to federal courts
States sued and won, connection with commerce is too weak
Gonzalez v. Raich (2005)
California resident used California law to protect marijuana use to ease cancer treatment
Federal law enforced, Raich sued
Supreme Court says federal government can regulate transport, but California resident still protected by California law
Conflict preemption
South Dakota v. Dole
Act passed to compact drunk driving in South Dakota
National Minimum driving age act passed
Each state had to create their own minimum age, or they would lose funding
South Dakota sued and lose
ACA
Federalism expands options for influencing politics
Health Insurance
Offered to employees by employers
Federal government incentivizes employers so they can pay less
Health insurance companies try to prevent nationalization (expansions of medicare/medicaid)
RomneyCare
Inspiration for ACA
Insurance can be purchased through state
Policy diffusion
Creates huge array of ways to get health insurance
Fairweather Federalism
Parties support states/federal rights when it is convenient
Ideologies are inconsistent
ACA and Medicaid
Cooperation between Congress and the President
ACA was challenged by Supreme Court (Checks/Balances)
Were created by mass opinion (participatory democratic theory)
NFIB v. Sebelius
Challenged ACA
Commerce, Necessary and Proper, and enumerated powers were used
Policy Diffusion
Policymaking in one government can affect another
State policies can influence other states or the federal government
ACA stemmed from RomneyCare, a state policy
States act as “laboratories” of democracy
Marijuana Policy
Questions over who should regulate (limited government)
Executive branch doesn’t enforce federal laws, which it can do without legislative approval (separation of powers)
Lobbying groups are powerful, many ways to influence policy (pluralist democratic theory)
Gerrymandering Reform
Voting is central to how people express consent to be governed (popular sovereignty)
States control elections and districting procedures (federalism)
Parties have lots of influence (pluralist democratic theory)
Struggles over government supervision of elections (concurrent powers)
TANF/AFDC
Contention over use of commerce clause (Social Contract)
TANF gives more control over funds to states (fiscal federalism)
Multiple access points (pluralist democratic theory)
PATRIOT Act
Increased intelligence coordination
Tried to stop security threat (Social Contract)
Led to protest
Passed by Congress, enforced differently than expected by Bush (separation of powers)
Low influence from interest groups on policy itself (elitist democratic theory)
Same Sex Marriage Policy
Natural Rights, Federalism
Interest groups very important (pluralist democratic theory)
Activists very successful (multiple access points)
Federalist 10
Federalist paper written to support the ratification of the Constitution
Defines a faction as united group of citizens that believe they have special privileges over other groups
Factions inevtiably form because people have different interests and they have liberty
Must mitigate the effects of factions, not the causes
Supported pluralist theory
Competition between interest groups creates good political activity
Republicanism, using elected officials to make decisions, should be used to filter ideas and stimulate deliberation
Republic must be small enough to prevent corruption but big enough to prevent pure democracy
Pure democracy leads to factionalism
Brutus 1
Anti-Federalist paper written against ratification of the Constitution
If a republic gets too big, the government will be too out of tune with the interests of the people
Public interest easier to see in smaller republics
Representatives are likely to act on self-interest
Republics depend on popular support
If the republic is too big, there would be too much disconnect between the government and the people
The people would be less willing to follow the laws
Argues for participatory democratic theory (closer individual connections to the federal government