AP Gov: Unit 3: Constitutional Foundations and Federalism

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 5 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/67

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

68 Terms

1
New cards

Pluralist Theory

  • Most people not interested in politics

  • Theory driven by people entering and exiting political stratum through interest groups

  • People enter into pressure system

  • Organized groups drive political change, not individual people

  • People can easily get involved

  • Group formation is easy

  • Competition between groups is necessary

  • Allows diverse ideas to be heard

  • Creates deliberation with policymakers

2
New cards

Participatory Democratic Theory

  • Politics/Policy based on mass opinon/action

  • Individuals don’t get more or less involved

  • Politics change based on mass opinion

  • Interest groups only matter when backed by public opinion

  • Effective linkage between mass opinion and policymaking process

  • Wisdom of the crowd, median voter theory

  • Mitigation of mob rule/tyranny

  • Somtimes works in Republican society if it allows direct participation

3
New cards

Elite Democratic Theory

  • Small stratum of wealthy/powerful

  • Political change driven by elite

  • Policy outcomes reflect desires of elites

  • Highly educated rule

  • Decisions typically preserve order and stability which allows them to perpetuate their position

  • Benevolent elites can help pursue a common good

  • NOT A CONSPIRACY

4
New cards

Thomas Hobbes

  • Wrote Leviathan, explored social contract

  • Legitimacy of government established by consent of the governed

  • Government has singular purpose endorsed by people

  • Government protects security of people who would be otherwise vulnerable

  • People give up some freedom to get security

    • Suggested government protects people from themselves

5
New cards

John Locke

  • People are rational and reasonable

  • People know their rights to life, liberty, and property, and know others have those rights

  • Natural Law: Protect your own natural rights, and protect others when possible

  • Somtimes hard to remember others have natural rights

  • Because people are unstable, social contract created to protect us from infringing on others natural rights, but only how we allow it to

  • Social Contract/Government created to solve disputes and protect people

  • Government can only do what people let it

  • Popular sovereignty important to legitimacy

  • If government steps out of line, they lose legitimacy

  • People must overthrow government if it can’t regain legitimacy

  • Consent of the governed tied to right to vote

6
New cards

Republicanism

  • Framers interested in it from Rome

  • Provided common knowledge for framers

  • Classical and enlightenment thinking blended

7
New cards

Classical Theory

  • Civic virtue necessary to sacrifice personal interests for community interests

  • Easier in smaller, homogeneous communities, people know each other better

  • Republican Citizenship

    • Sacrifices of time and energy, necessary to improve communities

    • Maintains democracy

8
New cards

English Republicanism

  • Education and understanding of natural rights creates less corruption

9
New cards

Colonial Governments

  • Colonies and states had local representative assemblies

  • Consentof individuals and local communities emphasized

  • Consent to states, not federal government

  • Basis of federalism

  • US needs a system that would perpetuate self-government and autonomy

10
New cards

State Governments

  • Experimentation early

  • Early precedent for checks and balances set

11
New cards

Constitutional Applications

  • Article 1 Section 8 enumerates powers of federal government (federalism, separation of powers, limited government)

  • House and Senate Structure (civic virtue, republicanism, social contract, consent of the government

12
New cards

Democratic Model Applications

  • Congressmembers wealthy and powerful (elite theory)

  • IG’s compete (pluralist theory)

  • BLM/Organized Protest (participatory theory)

13
New cards

Articles of Confederation

  • US had been in crisis

  • 2nd Continental Congress used to govern

  • Not very stable (moved around a lot, relied on all states, constantly under threat)

  • Solidified precedents set by 2nd Continental congress

  • Treaties and Fiscal Policy solidified

  • Finance becomes government responsibility

14
New cards

Structure of Articles

  • Citizens mostly belonged to states, not central government

  • Citizens vote for state legislature/local government

  • State legislature sends delegates to unicameral Congress

  • Each state got one vote, but could send multiple delegates

  • Could lay taxes, create and army, make treaties

  • Two committes - one to manage federal government, the other to administer federal powers in states

  • Issues

    • No formal executive branch

    • Law administration had to be approved by state governors

    • State courts/judges inclined to help state

    • Congress very responsive to states

    • Delegates had short terms

    • Difficult to install long-term policy

    • “Firm Friendship” of states (very decentralized)

    • Unanimous vote needed to amend

15
New cards

1780’s

  • Articles government wanted money from states

  • Government didn’t have money

  • Disunity

  • Native Americans/Outside Powers took advantage

16
New cards

Shay’s Rebellion

  • Soldiers didn’t get pension because government didn’t have money

  • Soldiers couldn’t pay taxes, rebelled

  • Articles government did nothing

  • Drove discussion at Philadelphia Convention

17
New cards

Philadelphia Convention

  • No discussion allowed outside

  • Each state gets one vote

  • Subcommittee system (complex issues tackled by small groups)

  • No decision final

  • Open-ended

  • No one opposed to federal power recruited

18
New cards

Representation of States and People

  • Constitutional Government directly represents people

  • Under Articles, citizens vote for state legislature, who votes for delegates

  • Under Constitution, each citizen votes for member of national legislature

  • Popular sovereignty in national legislature established

19
New cards

Great Compromise

  • Between Virginia Plan (direct representation) and New Jersey Plan (articles system)

  • HOR: Proportional and Direct

  • Senate: Not proportional and indirect

  • Shorter terms in lower house (HOR) and longer terms in upper house (Senate)

  • Different powers for each house

20
New cards

Enslaved Representation and Taxation

  • South wants enslaved counted for representation but not taxation

  • North vice versa

  • 3/5ths Clause: Every 5 enslaved people, three count for representation/taxation

  • Representation tied to taxation

  • NOT about human rights

  • Control over slave trade left to states

21
New cards

State/Federal Power and Sovereignty

  • Two sovereigns

  • Federalism

  • Federal government only in its sphere

  • Federal government supreme in its sphere

  • Separate spheres for federal and sovereignty

22
New cards

Interpolation, Adjudication, Amendment

  • Constitution needs stability and mutuability

  • Amendment proposed through supermajority in both houses

  • ¾ vote required in states

  • Difficult to amend

  • Invisible/Unwritten constitution (implied regulation, more eacily changed)

23
New cards

Citizenship

  • Constitution doesn’t solve

  • Federal government can dictate naturalizations

  • Stipulations around citizenship

  • 14th amendment changes this

24
New cards

Amendment Process and National Parties

  • Reflects problems with Articles

  • Many ideas for new amendments

  • Parties prevent ¾ of the states from ratifying new amendments despite national support

25
New cards

Power and Centralization

  • Debates over whether centralized government can use necessary power

  • Worries about terrorist attacks and international stability

  • Do crises justify intervention?

26
New cards

Federalism

  • Balance between federal and state power

27
New cards

Enumerated Powers

  • Powers given solely to the federal government

  • Article 1 Section 8

  • Development of Navy

  • Regulation of interstate commerce

  • Patents + Copyright

28
New cards

Denied Powers

  • Powers denied to the federal and state governments

  • Article 1 Section 9 + 10

29
New cards

Concurrent Powers

  • Powers both have at the same time

  • Can occur as long as on government’s exercise of pwoer doesn’t impede another’s

  • Taxation (both governments tax, taxes added on top of each other)

30
New cards

Reserved Powers

  • Powers given solely to the state governments

  • 10th amendment (non-enumerated, non-denied powers reserved to states)

31
New cards

Licensure

  • Understood to be controlled by states through 10th amendment

  • Federal government has been trying to control recently

32
New cards

Supremacy Clause

  • Laws must concur with higher laws

  • Constitution is supreme

  • Federal laws are next and must obey Constitution

  • Constitution > Federal Laws > Treaties/Acts of Congress > State Constitutions > State laws/statutes > local ordinances

  • Acts of federal agencies are equal to treaties/acts of Congress

33
New cards

Necessary and Proper Clause

  • Congress can effectuate any laws that are necessary to carry out its powers

  • Not a blank slate

  • Article 1 Section 8

  • Subject to Supremacy Clause

34
New cards

Commerce Clause

  • Congress can regulate commerce with foreign nations and between the states

  • What counts as interstate commerce is controversial

  • Led to many SC cases

35
New cards

State Mutuality and Sovereignty Clause

  • All states are equal (none have authority over others)

  • States can’t limit rights of US citizens

  • States can’t control borders

  • Horizontal Federalism

36
New cards

Pre-Emption Doctrine

  • Occurs when state and federal laws contradict

  • Field pre-emption

    • Federally exclusive areas

    • Occurs when state laws interfere too much, it is impracticable

  • Conflict pre-emption

    • As long as state and federal law don’t contradict too much, can coexist

37
New cards

Fiscal Federalism

  • Federal government gives state governments money to implement policy

  • Federal government can withhold money to incentivize state governments

  • Grants-in-aid used to give money to state governments

  • Some state programs are reliant on federal funding

38
New cards

Block Grants

  • Single chunks of money allocated based on available funds, not calculation

39
New cards

Formula Grants

  • States must qualify for money

  • Use annually reached calculations to determine how much each state needs

40
New cards

Project Grants

  • Given to individuals/corporations directly

  • Must applys

  • Government uses these to produce specific impacts

  • Evaluated and renewed based on success

41
New cards

New Deal

  • Marks big change in federalism

  • Before, individual grants came from state/local governments

  • After, federal government gives grants directly to individuals

  • New systems of collaboration between federal government and state government created

  • Tennessee Valley Association (TVA)

    • Created jobs and improved infrastructure in Tennessee Valley

  • Federal government gets to control more things

    • National Minimum Wage floor established

    • Conflict pre-emption

42
New cards

Great Society

  • Huge swath of programs initiated by Lyndon B. Johnson

  • More cooperation between federal government and state governments

  • More fiscal federalism

    • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

    • Federal government allocated money directly to schools based on poverty level

  • Medicaid

    • Run by state governments

    • Federal government matches state government contributions

    • State runs programs, federal government regulates

    • Block grants given to state governments for programs

43
New cards

Cross-Cutting Sanctions

  • Used to convince states to follow federal regulation by threatening to take funding away across multiple fields

44
New cards

Crossover Sanctions

  • Used to convince states to follow federal regulation by threatening to take funding away in the same field as the regulation

45
New cards

1980’s-1990’s

  • Devolution

    • More power to state governments through fiscal federalism

    • Move freedom to states, less coercion through fiscal federalism

  • AFDC-TANF

    • AFDC had strict federal rules on welfare checks

    • TANF allows states to design welfare programs

    • Different states put different requirements on welfare

    • Example of devolution

46
New cards

Post-2008

  • Polarized federalism

  • States become associated with ideology

  • ACA

    • Republican states sued after passage

    • Democratic states defended Obama

    • Republican states didn’t use extra ACA funding

    • Democratic states added a bunch of funding to welfare programs

47
New cards

Policy examples of Federalism

  • CHIP

    • Children’s Health Insurance

    • Federal government expands healthcare

  • DOMA

    • Allowed states not to recognize marriages in other states

    • Same-sex couples denied regulation, led to lawsuits

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

    • Students had to meet education standards for the state government to continue receiving benefits

    • Fiscal federalism

  • Help America Vote Act (HAVA)

    • State governments had to replace voting machines, get benefits

    • Didn’t get much federal aid to do so (major trend)

  • Clean Power Plan

    • Obama gives each state a target for carbon emissions

    • Each state has to create a plan which the federal government would help with financially

    • Shot down, but good example of federalism

  • College

    • Required to be accredited

    • Msut ensure all universities are up to par with national regulations

48
New cards

14th Amendment

  • Fundamentally changed federalism

  • Clear definition of national citizenship, distinction drawn between national and state citizenship

  • Federal citizenship definite, state depends on residence

  • States can’t make laws that restrict rights of federal citizens

  • Fundamental rights can’t be taken away without due process

  • Equal protection of the laws

  • Federal government has power to limit state governments

  • Expanded Bill of Rights to states (incorporation)

49
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

  • National Bank created, branch in each state

  • Maryland had heavily taxed its branch of the national bank, almost bankrupting it

  • Question over whether Congress can create a bank and whether Maryland can regulate it

  • Ruled bank was Constitutional and could not be limited by states

50
New cards

US v. Lopez (1995)

  • Congress passed law forbidding guns in schools

  • Controlled k-12 education and community safety, often seen as state domains

  • State governments didn’t stop the act (acknowledged supremacy clause)

  • Individual sued and won, claiming implied powers were too loosely related.

51
New cards

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

  • Congress had allowed an individual control over a waterway

  • State of NY allowed another individual to have control

  • US uses commerce clause, wins

  • First time using commerce clause

52
New cards

US v. EC Knight, Hammer v. Dagenheart, Carter v. Carter Coal

  • Limits on trusts and child labor from federal government

  • Companies sued, claiming it was outside of commerce clause

  • Supreme Court sided with corporations, said moral regulation of companies left to state government

  • More skepticism of use of commerce clause nad N+P during late 1800s

53
New cards

Wickard v. Filburn, Jones v. NLRB, US v. Darby Lumber

  • New Deal laws limited corporations

  • Corporations sued but lost

  • Big shift from late 1800’s to early 1900s

54
New cards

Katenbach v. McClug, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US

  • CRA era politics used commerce clause to restrict private segregation

  • Businesses sued

  • Court sided with CRA

  • Fiscal Federalism (sanctions/incentives)

55
New cards

US v. Morrison (2000)

  • Violence against women act (VAWA) allowed women to appeal domestic violence and rape cases to federal courts

  • States sued and won, connection with commerce is too weak

56
New cards

Gonzalez v. Raich (2005)

  • California resident used California law to protect marijuana use to ease cancer treatment

  • Federal law enforced, Raich sued

  • Supreme Court says federal government can regulate transport, but California resident still protected by California law

  • Conflict preemption

57
New cards

South Dakota v. Dole

  • Act passed to compact drunk driving in South Dakota

  • National Minimum driving age act passed

  • Each state had to create their own minimum age, or they would lose funding

  • South Dakota sued and lose

58
New cards

ACA

  • Federalism expands options for influencing politics

  • Health Insurance

    • Offered to employees by employers

    • Federal government incentivizes employers so they can pay less

    • Health insurance companies try to prevent nationalization (expansions of medicare/medicaid)

  • RomneyCare

    • Inspiration for ACA

    • Insurance can be purchased through state

    • Policy diffusion

  • Creates huge array of ways to get health insurance

59
New cards

Fairweather Federalism

  • Parties support states/federal rights when it is convenient

  • Ideologies are inconsistent

60
New cards

ACA and Medicaid

  • Cooperation between Congress and the President

  • ACA was challenged by Supreme Court (Checks/Balances)

  • Were created by mass opinion (participatory democratic theory)

  • NFIB v. Sebelius

    • Challenged ACA

    • Commerce, Necessary and Proper, and enumerated powers were used

61
New cards

Policy Diffusion

  • Policymaking in one government can affect another

  • State policies can influence other states or the federal government

  • ACA stemmed from RomneyCare, a state policy

  • States act as “laboratories” of democracy

62
New cards

Marijuana Policy

  • Questions over who should regulate (limited government)

  • Executive branch doesn’t enforce federal laws, which it can do without legislative approval (separation of powers)

  • Lobbying groups are powerful, many ways to influence policy (pluralist democratic theory)

63
New cards

Gerrymandering Reform

  • Voting is central to how people express consent to be governed (popular sovereignty)

  • States control elections and districting procedures (federalism)

  • Parties have lots of influence (pluralist democratic theory)

  • Struggles over government supervision of elections (concurrent powers)

64
New cards

TANF/AFDC

  • Contention over use of commerce clause (Social Contract)

  • TANF gives more control over funds to states (fiscal federalism)

  • Multiple access points (pluralist democratic theory)

65
New cards

PATRIOT Act

  • Increased intelligence coordination

  • Tried to stop security threat (Social Contract)

  • Led to protest

  • Passed by Congress, enforced differently than expected by Bush (separation of powers)

  • Low influence from interest groups on policy itself (elitist democratic theory)

66
New cards

Same Sex Marriage Policy

  • Natural Rights, Federalism

  • Interest groups very important (pluralist democratic theory)

  • Activists very successful (multiple access points)

67
New cards

Federalist 10

  • Federalist paper written to support the ratification of the Constitution

  • Defines a faction as united group of citizens that believe they have special privileges over other groups

  • Factions inevtiably form because people have different interests and they have liberty

  • Must mitigate the effects of factions, not the causes

  • Supported pluralist theory

  • Competition between interest groups creates good political activity

  • Republicanism, using elected officials to make decisions, should be used to filter ideas and stimulate deliberation

  • Republic must be small enough to prevent corruption but big enough to prevent pure democracy

  • Pure democracy leads to factionalism

68
New cards

Brutus 1

  • Anti-Federalist paper written against ratification of the Constitution

  • If a republic gets too big, the government will be too out of tune with the interests of the people

  • Public interest easier to see in smaller republics

  • Representatives are likely to act on self-interest

  • Republics depend on popular support

    • If the republic is too big, there would be too much disconnect between the government and the people

    • The people would be less willing to follow the laws

  • Argues for participatory democratic theory (closer individual connections to the federal government