FPSY3900: Jury Decision-Making Influences (Definitions)

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 28

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Lecture 4

29 Terms

1

Juror Biases

  • can influence juror verdicts

  • and unfair decision-making by jurors can result in injustice

New cards
2

Evidentiary

official case evidence that was introduced in court and used by the jury

  • has the strongest impact

New cards
3

Extra Evidentiary

evidence that was not introduced in the case

  • heard outside the trial

  • mostly used at the end to reach the final verdict

  • not officially used in court, maybe heard from outside sources

New cards
4

Pre-trial Bias

Pre-existing biases prior to trial

  • Can stem from pre-evidence presentation (e.g., publicity)

    • problematic for high profile cases

    • more frequent in modern society

  • biases resulted from the case that popular within the community

    • related to the case at hand

  • not inherent biases

  • as you experience information along the case itself

  • it can bring disadvantages for those involved in the case

New cards
5

Cognitive BIas

Heuristics and associated biases can lead to errors in judgements

New cards
6

Bias from External Legal Actors

  • Expert testimony can influence juror perceptions of evidence strength

  • Expert witnesses may not be impartial decision-makers themselves

    • unlikely to be rational

  • bias during the trial

  • expert witness are brought into explain things better to the jury

    • often brought into explain evidence

  • problem: authority effect

    • may put more weight onto what they were saying and apply it to their decision

  • Snowball effect

    • bringing in their bias to influence the jurors

    • leaking out during trial testimonies

New cards
7

Implicit Bias

  • Implicit attitudes

  • Implicit stereotypes

New cards
8

Hate Crimes

Biases can influence juror perceptions of victim blame

New cards
9

Intimate Partner Violence

Biases in domestic cases can shape how jurors perceive evidence and testimony

New cards
10

Sexual Offences

Stereotypes facilitate the criminalization of LGBTQ+ people for various sexual offences

New cards
11

Voire Dire

Opportunity to identify existing juror biases

New cards
12

Validity of considering orientation/identity

Identification with individuals in the case

New cards
13

Evidence Type

some have larger impacts than others

New cards
14

Jury Orientation

  • Using video orientations to target biases

    • doesn’t include anything specific

  • Can include an invitation to take an IAT

  • Focus on the bias most related to the trial

New cards
15

Jury Selection

  • Voir Dire = Opportunity to identify biases

  • Attorneys may struggle with identifying implicit biases

  • Building salience

    • want to bring to light of LGBTQ+ and inform jurors so that they’re aware

  • IAT

  • some people try to hide them

New cards
16

Jury Instruction

  • Conventional instructions do little to combat bias

  • Could include more information about implicit bias

    • clear and detail

New cards
17

Expert Testimony

  • Help jurors understand the impact of implicit bias

  • Better understanding of implicit bias in the case

  • Better understanding of their own implicit biases

    • how to become aware

    • how to respond to them and let them impact decision making

New cards
18

Hesitation

Possibility of making the issue worse

  • fear that there will be the opposite effect

  • may lose confidence in their neutrality

  • ignore the fact that their implicit biases are actually influencing them

New cards
19

Lack of Understanding

Even criminal justice professionals are not fully informed

  • who is training the trainers about implicit biases?

New cards
20

Viral Bias

is a result of the viralness and publicity of the case/trial

New cards
21

Pre-decisional Distortion

early preference leading to a verdict

  • brain might take this as a cognitive bias

  • might distort anything after the fact; to fit to what is already in your head

New cards
22

Implicit Attitudes

evaluations, negative or positive of a particular social group

  • how we evaluate other groups we see in society

New cards
23

Implicit Stereotypes

beliefs that we have on groups

New cards
24

Explicit Homphobes

they know and show it

  • Hard Question: hard or pointed questions

    • feelings towards LGBTQ+ groups and controversial topics

    • don’t want to ask questions that are super specific

  • Soft Questions: less controversial

    • Would you feel comfortable if a gay couple moved next to you?

New cards
25

Closet Homophobes

aware of these biases but will try to hide it in order to fit in with the group

  • Proxy Questions

    • tries to get to the topic indirectly

    • lifestyle, attitudes

    • Do you have any friends who are gay?

New cards
26

Implicit Homophobes

believe in LGBTQ+ community, but they don’t know they actually have biases

New cards
27

Authority Effect

may put more weight onto what they were saying & apply it to their decision

New cards
28

Hard Questions

hard or pointed questions

New cards
29

Proxy Questions

tries to get to the topic indirectly

  • lifestyle

  • attitudes

New cards
robot