PKG 315: Customer Complaint Systems

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/37

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

38 Terms

1
New cards

Corrective Action Approach

Local package representatives report damage using a global damage report template —> establishes a global data collection center —> once “package-capability” is quantitively established, move to predictive capability

2
New cards

Preventative Action Approach

Proactive; lab work successfully predicts damage boundary; creates a performance package specification and/or BOM (packing instructions) —> drive towards new global business opportunities

3
New cards

Formal Customer Complaint Systems

Houses the “history” of all packaging customer complaints

4
New cards

A good complaint system…

Provides “data-searching” capabilities where supplier performance can be measured

5
New cards

Approach & Methods

Always request electronic pictures of the damage

Request that the damaged shipment be returned for your personal inspection

Always ask if the entire shipment is damaged. Were some of the packages not damaged? Was the shipment parcel less-than-truckload (LTL) or truckload?

Ask for the mode of shipment

6
New cards

Distance

The farther apart the shipping point and final destination are, the more likely it is for package damage to occur (exponential increase)

7
New cards

Highway to railroad

Once considered the least severe

Vibration and road shocks

Braking, acceleration, sway

8
New cards

Rail to port

Coupler slack (the amount of free movement of one car before it transmits its motion to an adjoining coupled car)

Coupling impact

Vibration

Sway

9
New cards

Ocean to port of destination

Water entry

Cargo sweat

Climatic conditions

Vibration, shock, compression, rolling, pitching, surging, swaying

10
New cards

Highway to customer

Impact against loading docks

Vibration and road shocks

Coupling impact

Braking, acceleration, and sway

11
New cards

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

The process of discovering the underlying source of problems in order to identify appropriate solutions

12
New cards

Root Cause Factor

Removing it prevents the problem from recurring

13
New cards

Casual Factor

Contributing action that affects an incident/event’s outcome, but is not the underlying issue.

14
New cards

Returning the damaged shipment

May be easier (and cheaper) to dispose of the damaged shipment locally

Leaking containers cannot be shipped

15
New cards

Vendor Contracts

Establish a good working relationship early

If they’re a global supplier, establish a protocol that both parties will follow to handle global customer complaints

Let them know that you expect responses to customer plaints in writing and within an agreed upon timeframe

16
New cards

Package Damage Classifications

Customer perception is reality

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Scientific definition(s)

17
New cards

Package/Product Damage

Reproduce it in a packable lab whenever possible so you can understand the root cause. Once the cause is determined, you can proceed with a package redesign

18
New cards

Control Samples

Always have them. They’re used to compare to for any change during experiments

19
New cards

Package Specification

Used to document your results; create performance-oriented component specifications based on various standards

Must have the critical-to-quality parameters documented (performance level is documented in the component specification)

Need to have the supplier sign off on it (legal contract)

20
New cards

Component Specification

Lists qualitative, quantitative, and performance values

21
New cards

Qualitative Values

Material(s) of construction

Color

22
New cards

Quantitative Values

Density

Mullen value

Tensile strength

23
New cards

Performance Values

Pass 4-foot drop test

Pass 49CFR vibration test

ASTM D 1709 dart test

24
New cards

Functional Testing

Increasing the drop height and documenting the package damage at each level. Document each increasing level of severity. Make every effort to match or exceed what the package is experiencing in the field

25
New cards

Interpreting the test data

What does it mean?

Safety factor — level?

Lab testing to field data —> accelerated testing, correlation, trend?

26
New cards

Field Data

Given by a great customer complaint system

Contains the voice of the customer (i.e. what they’d accept/the level or damage allowed)

Formal system (data is digitalized)

Uses codes for package failure (i.e. A6, A7, etc.)

27
New cards

A6

Crushed primary container

28
New cards

A7

Crushed primary solid fiberboard carton

29
New cards

A8

Crushed secondary corrugated shipper (carton)

30
New cards

A9

Crushed unit load (pallet load)

31
New cards

Package Evaluation Cycle

  1. Observe the performance in the field

  2. Reference previous package performance in the lab

  3. Revise the test protocol to match field observation

  4. Correct the deficiency of the package and revise the package specification

Cycle continues

32
New cards

Why are local package damage investigators needed?

To identify where in the distribution cycle the damage occurred

33
New cards

Global Contacts

Train area experts with package engineering knowledge

Seek the assistance of these local experts to address customer complaints in their areas

Establish English as the primary language to communicate

34
New cards

ISTA

International Safe Transit Association

35
New cards

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

36
New cards

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Materials

37
New cards

ISO

International Organization for Standardization

38
New cards

CGMP

Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations