Psych 403 9

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/109

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

110 Terms

1
New cards
neglect refers to
when a patient does not notice or respond to stimuli contralateral to the side of brain injury
2
New cards
names that mean neglecgt
neglect, unilateral spatial neglect, heminegelect, semi innatention
3
New cards
hemineglect is most commonly caused by
stroke
4
New cards
broad symptoms that may be present with hemineglect
egocentric neglect, allocentric neglect, peripersonal space neglect, anosagnosia
5
New cards
egocentric neglect
objects or people relative to the patients perspective are neglects
6
New cards
allocentric neglect
neglecting part of an object regardless of which side of visual field it falls on
7
New cards
peripersonal space neglect/ extrapersonal neglect
neglect or things within personal space
8
New cards
anosagnosia
when the patient is unaware of neglect
9
New cards
strokes resulting in neglect often affect the
middle cerebral artery
10
New cards
neglect is characterized by
a reduction in awareness of the contra lesional space
11
New cards
true/false ego and allo centric neglect may both occur in a person based on task demands
true
12
New cards
severe stroke patients with neglect may also have BLANK during the acute stage
ipsilesional deviation of their heads and eyes
13
New cards
when might someone’s neglect be less evident
when they are more aroused
14
New cards
true/false neglect may be due to sensory or motor impairments
false
15
New cards
prompt: watch a video on somatoparaphrenia
\-
16
New cards
neglect is NOT
modality specific, due to defective sensation, due to defective memory
17
New cards
why is neglect NOT modality specific
there is normally no variation in degree of neglect across different sensory modalities
18
New cards
neglect is modified by
attention and motivation
19
New cards
neglect is dependent on
interpretation
20
New cards
impairments in motor or sensory aspects do not cause neglect, but they might BLANK
worsen outcome or complicate
21
New cards
neglect is best explained by BLANK theories
attentional
22
New cards
what happened in the Milan experiment
subjects were asked to recall buildings in a famous plaza in Milan that they were familiar with
23
New cards
results of the Milan experiment
subjects with left side contralateral neglect were able to recall more landmarks on the right side when asked to imagine themselves facing the cathedral, recalled fewer on the left side. When imagining on the steps of the cathedral remembered less on the left that they could previously remember and more on the right.
24
New cards
what does the milan experiment suggest
issues with recall are not due to faulty memory, due to attention
25
New cards
some common tasks to measure neglect
block pattern arranging, line bisection task, cancellation tasks
26
New cards
personal neglect can be measured by
asking a person to groom
27
New cards
extrapersonal neglect can be measured by
asking them to name objects in the room they are in
28
New cards
extent of neglect varies with
type of task used
29
New cards
problem with measuring neglect
no test best describes neglect which leads to variations in estimates across studies
30
New cards
what is the most common site of injury resulting in neglect
right parietal lobe, specifically the supra marginal gyrus
31
New cards
white matter connections especially the BLANK are implicated in neglect
superior longitudinal fasiculus tracts linking the frontal and parietal regions, fronto-occipital fasiculus
32
New cards
aside from the supra marginal gyrus, what are some common sites of injury where neglect occurs
frontal lobes, striatum , subcortical structures, interhemispheric activitiy differences
33
New cards
generally, neglect results from
dysfunction of widespread brain networks
34
New cards
what is a brain sign of good recovery from spatial neglect
increased connectivity between implicated regions and ability to be activated by relevant tasks
35
New cards
some initial spikes in neglect are related to
edema and diaschisis
36
New cards
recovery from neglect is greatest in the first few BLANK after stroke
weeks
37
New cards
network dysfunction in BLANK seems to be most critical to neglect symptoms
white matter pathways in the right hemisphere
38
New cards
why are right hemisphere lesions more likely to result in contralateral neglect
right hemisphere attends to both visual fields whereas left attends to only one
39
New cards
neglect occurs in about BLANK % of stroke patients
25
40
New cards
patients most often recover from neglect in the first BLANK
month
41
New cards
recovery for neglect is slowest for
neglect of peripersonal space
42
New cards
allochiria
a person starts to respond to stimuli on the neglected side as if it was on the good side
43
New cards
sensory extinction
a person responds correctly UNLESS a similar stimulus is presented bilaterally
44
New cards
which hemisphere lesion is likely to have a longer recovery time for neglect
right
45
New cards
people with BLANK damage have a limited potential for recovery from negelct
callosal
46
New cards
consequences of neglect
ignoring one side of the body

attending to only one side

bumping into objects and getting into accidents

difficulty finding objects, doing hobbies

lack of insight or awareness
47
New cards
people with neglect generally need more rehab and have the following outcomes
longer hospital stays, slower recovery rates, require more post rehab assistance, less likely to go home
48
New cards
true/false neglect can impair reading
true
49
New cards
paolucci and colleagues studied neglect with a BLANK approach
matched comparison
50
New cards
neglect negatively impacts BLANK
rehab
51
New cards
findings of paulucci and colleagues
neglect negatively impacts rehab, unilateral spatial neglect did worse, length of stay was higher
52
New cards
why is rehab hard to provide specifically for neglect
there is a lack of insight into the problem
53
New cards
goals of neglect therapy
forced awareness of neglected space, fixing body orientation and position sense
54
New cards
some examples of neglect therapies
visual scanning, prisms, NIBS, motor and sensory activation, feedback training, eyepatches, caloric stimulation, TENS, neck stimulation, drug treatments
55
New cards
paradigm for neglect therapy
remind the patient of neglected space, do exercise to encourage attending to neglected area, reinforce good searching behaviours
56
New cards
overall, is there good evidence for neglect therapy
some evidence for improving negative symptoms, not convincing overall
57
New cards
does neglect therapy work?
we dont know yet
58
New cards
prompt: why is neglect more common after right than left hemisphere injury?
\-
59
New cards
prompt: discuss the evidence that negelct is not due to sensory loss or a general memory impairment
\-
60
New cards
Prompt: what is the most common and best supported treatment for neglect? Are you confident in findings?
\-
61
New cards
Prompt: John insists that his left arm does not belong to him, what is the name for this specific symptom and the disorder it is part of?
\-
62
New cards
results of the cochrane review on neglect therapy
non pharmacological interventions have yet to be proven to improve outcomes
63
New cards
cognitive impact of stroke
anosognosia, attention, apraxia, concentration difficulties, memory impairment, executive dysdunction, vascular cognitive impairment
64
New cards
what is another term for vascular cognitive impairment
dementia
65
New cards
BLANK % of th population will have vascular cognitive impairment
5
66
New cards
VCI
vascular cognitive impairment
67
New cards
true/false stroke increases the risk of dementia in those with mild cognitive impairment
true
68
New cards
common signs of concentration problems
cannot filter out what is going on around you, cannot stay focused on a single taks, cannot move from one task to another easily, cannot do more than one thing at nce, cannot processes things quickly
69
New cards
areas assesed in cognitive rehab
attention, executive function, learning and memory, global cognition, visuospatial perception and orientation, amusia, activities of daily living
70
New cards
what is visuospatial perception and orientation
the ability to correctly process and mentally manipulate visuospatial information
71
New cards
amusia
the inability to perceive or recognize music
72
New cards
example test to assess attention
colour trails test
73
New cards
prompt: watch a video on Colour trails test
\-
74
New cards
example learning and memory test
corsi block tapping test (forward) and digit span test (forward)
75
New cards
prompt: watch videos of corsi block tapping test and digit span test
\-
76
New cards
global cognition tests
WAIS, MOCA
77
New cards
MOCA =
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
78
New cards
what percentage of ischemic patients will experience executive dysfunction
40
79
New cards
BLANK independently predicts poor ADL function, lower quality of life, less community participation, and lower independence
executive dysfunction
80
New cards
why does cognitive impairment affect participation in rehab
impairment requires more therapy
81
New cards
executive dysfunction results from BLANK injury and associated connections in the BLANK lobe
prefrontal cortex, parietal
82
New cards
true/false executive dysfunction is not replicated in rodent or primate studies
false
83
New cards
VLPFC injury affects
short term memory
84
New cards
the RPFC is involved in BLANK, probably processing
multitasking, long term memory and what others are thinking about
85
New cards
the DLPFC is involved in BLANK
planning, manipulating stored memories
86
New cards
Medial PFC is involved in
selecting among conflicting behaviours
87
New cards
besides the PFC, what other regions are implicated in executive dysfunction because of network connections
default mode network, salience network, attention networks, and frontoparietal networks
88
New cards
true/false lesion location and size predict executive dysfunction
false
89
New cards
true/false general scales of stroke severity such as mRS are good predictors of executive dysfunction
false
90
New cards
true/false structural and functional connectivity are better measures of executive function
true
91
New cards
integrety of the BLANK, BLANK predicts executive dysfunction vell
superior longitudintal fasiculus, fronto-parietal connection
92
New cards
SLF
superior longitudinal fasciculus
93
New cards
additional BLANK such as atrophy and small lesions in addition to stroke
cerebrovascular burden
94
New cards
BLANK network connectivity is related to good recovery whereas BLANK network connectivity is linked to poorer executive function
within, between
95
New cards
behaviour recovery following stroke is predicted by
recovery of network modularity
96
New cards
modularity measures
the density of links inside connections compared to links between connections
97
New cards
prompt: watch a video on modularity
\-
98
New cards
what domains show recovery with increased modularity, what do not
higher demand cognitive tasks do, motor and visual domains do not,
99
New cards
modularity is decreased in acute patients but returns near control levels at BLANK and BLANK times
3 month, 1 year
100
New cards
decline in modularity reflects less BLANK within a system and less BLANK between systems
integration, separation