AP GOV Required Cases

studied byStudied by 4 people
0.0(0)
Get a hint
Hint

Marbury v Madison (1803)

1 / 13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

14 Terms

1

Marbury v Madison (1803)

In deciding this case about judicial appointments (Midnight judges not receiving pay), the court established the principle of judicial review, empowering the Supreme Court to declare an act of the legislative or executive branch unconstitutional.

New cards
2

McChulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Can’t tax the bank, federal laws supersede state laws, affirmed necessary and proper clause that Congress had the right to create a bank

New cards
3

Schenck v. US (1919)

Can’t hand out anti draft pamphlets if its a danger to the US, screw the first the espionage act is okay. “Clear and present danger” means the 1st doesn’t apply

New cards
4

Brown v Board (1954)

Can’t segregate schools on race bc it violates the equal protection clause (14th)

New cards
5

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Redistricting must be done with equal population bc of the equal protection clause (14th)

New cards
6

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Can’t pray in schools bc it violates establishment clause of the first amendment, gov can’t help establish or support a religion (they were paying teachers to lead prayer)

New cards
7

Gideon v Wainwright (1963)

6th amendment rights to a lawyer DOES apply to state courts and Gideon was wrongly tried without a lawyer when he requested one.

New cards
8

TInker v Des Moines (1969)

1st amendment, gotta be able to protest the war can’t suspend the students

New cards
9

New York Times Co v US (1971)

Can’t restrict the press, 1st amendment presides over the vague call for security. AKA, NY Times can publish the pentagon papers suck it Nixon

New cards
10

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

The amish ❤ can’t be forced to go to 8th grade because it restricts the free exercise clause (religion) of the first amendment.

New cards
11

Shaw v Reno (1993)

Can’t draw district lines solely on race, gotta consider other factors because of the equal protection clause (14th)

New cards
12

US v. Lopez (1995)

Commerce clause does not grant the right to make possession of a gun in a school a federal crime, big overstep bc it is NOT an economic activity

New cards
13

McDonald v Chicago (2010)

Used selective incorporation under the 14th to apply the 2nd amendment to the states, Chicago and the state of Illinois could not restrict guns

New cards
14

Citizens united v FEC (2010)

1st amendment protects political spending by companies, associations, and unions. Political speech is essential to democracy

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 29 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 37 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 282 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard93 terms
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard20 terms
studied byStudied by 9 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard34 terms
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard24 terms
studied byStudied by 35 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard112 terms
studied byStudied by 16 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard118 terms
studied byStudied by 11 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard47 terms
studied byStudied by 4 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard230 terms
studied byStudied by 90 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)