week 2: ethical challenges and debates

how can the power that psychologists hold cause harm to individuals/the general public?

can cause major harm to clients eg crossing boundaries

more subtle harm to them through breaches of confidentiality

define iatrogenic effects

a treatment leads to unintended negative effects

what 4 principles is the bps code of ethics based on?

respect for autonomy/privacy/dignity of individuals/groups/communities

competence

social responsibility

integrity

name 5 key concerns of the bps code of ethics

consent

deception

debriefing

withdrawal from investigation

confidentiality

protection from harm

observational research

giving advice

issues in professional practice

give 3 criticisms of ethical code formation

who do the codes actually protect - researchers or clients/ppts?

criteria derive from psychologists and not public judgements of morality

codes are reactive not preventative

fails to acknowledge social context in which ethical situations occur

rigid rule following ignores social realities

conflicts with profit motives

psychologists don’t want to acknowledge ethical issues - can make them appear less professional

what does natural science psychology suggest about the role of psychologists?

psychologists are objective researchers whose work is benevolent and improves lives

how does critical psychology argue against natural science psychology?

belief in an objective, value free position can harm ethical conduct - why are we claiming we can do that if we’re only human?