1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Is personality stable across adulthood?
We tend to believe that people’s personalities are complex but remain relatively stable over time as life is easier and people easier to understan and interact with if we know what to expect.
We also believe that we can change undesirable aspects of our and others’ personalities which implies personality is modifiable.
Dispositional traits
Aspects of personality that are consistent across different contexts and can be compared across a group along a continuum, representing high and low degrees of the characteristic
Personal concerns
Things that are important to people; their goals, and their major concerns in life
Life narrative
Aspects of personality that pull everything together: those integrative aspects that give a person an idenity or sense of self
Dispositional traits
People’s characteristic behavior can be understood through attributes that reflect underlying dispositional traits, which are relatively enduring aspects of personality
Personality traits are based on 3 assumptions:
Traits are based on comparisons across individuals
The qualities of a trait must be distinctive enough to avoid confusion
Traits of an individual person are a stable characteristic
What can be assumed due to dispositional traits?
Trait theories assume that little change in personality occurs during adulthood
The five-factor trait model
Costa and McCrae developed a model of personality with 5 independent dimensions, each with 6 facets":
Neuroticism
Extraversion
Openness to experience
Agreeableness
Conscientiousness
Much of the research has focused on the first 3 dimensions
Neuroticism
A person's tendency to experience negative emotions,
Has 6 facets:
Anxiety
Hostility
Underlying emotions: fear and anger
Self-consciousness
Depression
Underlying emotions: shame and sorrow
Impulsiveness
Vulnerability
Manifested by behaviors rather than emotions
Associated with a higher risk of developing AD
Conscientiousness
A person's level of organization, responsibility, and goal-directedness
Conscientious people are:
Hardworking
Ambitious
Energetic
Scrupulous
Perserving
Desirous to make something of themselves
Associated with a lower risk of developing AD
Also correlations between high conscientiousness and decreased incidence of mild cognitive impairment and reduced cognitive decline
Openness to experience
Has 6 facets, representing 6 areas:
Fantasy: a vivid imagination and active dream life
Aesthetics: appreciation of art and beauty
Action: willingness to try something new
Ideas: curiosity; valuing knowledge for the sake of knowing
Values: open-minded about values
Open-mindedness: willingness to think of different possibilities
Associated with a lower risk of developing AD
Tend to be intelligent and tolerant of stressful situations
Prefer occupations that value theoretical thinking and put less emphasis on the money aspects of jobs
Extraversion
A person's sociability, energy levels, and preference for social interaction
Has 6 facets divide in 2 groups:
Interpersonal traits
Warmth
Gregariousness
Assertiveness
Temperamental traits
Activity
Excitement seeking
Positive emotions
Like to keep busy and prefer to be in stimulating and exciting environments
Relates well to occupational interests
Agreeableness
A person's tendency to be cooperative, empathetic, and trusting
Agreeable people are not: skeptical, mistrustful, callous, unsympathetic, stubborn, rude, skillful manipulators, agressove go-getters
May lead to being overly dependent and self-effacing
Trait stability evidence
Over a 12-year period, in a logitudinal study of aging Costa and McCrae, 10 personality traits measured by GZTS remained stable
They believed that personality traits stop changing by 30 an they appear to be set in plaster
Personality ajustment
Developmental changes in terms of their adaptive value an functionality
Personality growth
Ideal end states such as increased such as increased self-transcendece, wisdom, and integrity
Ego development
Fundamental changes in the ways our thoughts, values, morals, and goals are organized
What happens to dispositional traits?
Change are complex and non-linear
Personality adjustment (common) vs. personality growth (rare)
Current consensus of change in the big 5 with increasing age
Less neuroticism
More agreeableness and conscientiousness
Decreased emotional volatility
Wzrus an Robberts TESSERA (triggering situations, expectancy, states/state expressions, and reactions)
Long-term personality development is the product of repeated short-term, situational processes
These short-term processes differ across people
Some people show changes in personality traits and others do not
Alternatives to the 5 factors model
Lack of a cross-cultural perspective
HEXACO (6 factor) moel includes on honesty-humility, which taps into individual differences in fairness and modesty
Other approaches:
A 7-facet model based on psychobiology
A dark-tetrad model based on behaviors that violate social norms
Conclusions about dispositional traits
The idea that personality traits stop changing at age 30 doesn’t have uniform support
A partial resolution of the stability/change controvery can be found by looking at how the research was conducted as personality traits tend to appear more stable when data averaged over large groups
Personal concerns
Reflect what people want during particular times of their lives an within specific domains
Are explicitly contextual
Are narrative descriptions that rely on life circumstances
Change over time
Theoretical bases of personal concerns
Limitied empirical research
Numerous theories that postulate developmental stages
Each qualitative stage reflects the core concern for that period of life
Jung’s theory
One of the first theories that propossed personality development during aulthood
Introuced thenotion of midlife crisis
Emphasized that each aprct of a person’s personality must be in balance with all others
Postulated 2 basic orientations of the Ego, and the 2 age-related trendss
Introversion-extraversion (introversion increasing with age)
Masculinity-feminity (with younger adults condorming more to gender roles)
Argues that people move toward integrating these dimensions as they age, with midlife being an especially important period
Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development
First to develop a truly lifespan throy of personality development
Emphaasiez the interaction between inner maturational plan (nature) and external social demands (nurture)
His 8 stages represent the 8 great struggles that he believed people must undergo
Each struggle has a certain time of ascendancy and follow the epigenetic principle meaning each struggle must be resolved to continue development
Strengths developed in childhood and adolescence
Trust vs. mistrust
Autonomy vs shame and soubt
Initiative vs guilt
Industry vs inferiority
Identity vs identity confusion
Strengths developed in adulthood
Intimacy vs isolation: major development of young adulthood involves establishing a fully intimate relationship with another; the strength that emerges is love
Partners in friendship, sex competition, cooperation
Generativity vs stagnation: major development of middle adulthood involves the struggle beween a sense of generativity (need to maintain and perpetuate in society) and sense of stagnation (feeling of self-absorption); the strength that emerges is caring
Divided labor and shared household
Integrity vs despair: major development of old age involves a growing awareness of the nearness of end of life with the goal to ealuate and make sense of one’s life; the strength here is wisdom
Humankind
Further explorations of generativity
McAdam;s model hows how generativity results from:
Complex interconnections between societal and inner forces
Which lea to a concern for the nex tgeneration and a belief in teh goodness of the human enterprise
Leaving a legacy is an important aspect of generativity
Research indicates:
Middle and olderadulthood are more preoccupied with this
May be a strog preictor of emotional well being
Theories based on life transitions
Based on the idea that adults go through a series of life transitions and crises alternating with periods of stability
Not clearly supported by research
Midlife crisis
Idea that as middle age we take a good look at ourselves in the hope of achieving a better understanding of who we are
Very little data to support the claim that all people inevitably experience a crisis in middle age
Midlife correction: transition may be better characterized as a midlife correction; reevaluating one’s roles and dreams an making the necessary corrections
Conclusions about personal concerns
Evidence supports substantive change in personal concerns as adults age
Change is not specifc to an age but is dependent on many factors