Research Methods

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:28 PM on 9/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

35 Terms

1
New cards
<p>Carl Sagan</p>

Carl Sagan

advocate of science; prevent backslide into supersitition and unintellectualism, resist impulse to give up

<p>advocate of science; prevent backslide into supersitition and unintellectualism, resist impulse to give up</p>
2
New cards

Where does social science fit in with the other sciences?

it usually doesn’t really fit in; hierarchy based on complexity (deterministic → propable science: problems we are trying to solve becoming more complex) (physics → chem → bio → psych → sociology)

3
New cards

Physics

first in hierarchy (deterministic); simpler world outlook than sociolpgy; gravity does not change

4
New cards

Chemistry

2nd in line; conclusions reached become more propable; more likely vs less likely outcomes

5
New cards

Biology

3rd in line up; cells are so much more ocmplex than subatomic particles; can’t say how a specific kind of single cell amoeba will react to a stimuli with certainity

6
New cards

Psychology

4th in ilne; complex/more propable because human behavior

7
New cards

Sociology - Sciences Hierarchy

human beings as a whole (more coplicated phenomena); never tell you with certainity what will happen (tendancies and patterns) → when adding human behavior, things go non-linear

8
New cards

What are we typically interested in in science?

what causes certain things to happen

9
New cards

Variable

any measureable thing that tends to have different values across cases; ex. GNP (gorss national product), height, weight, age, etc.

10
New cards

Case

whatever unit of anaylsis we are doing; ex. countries, people, etc.

11
New cards

Research Question

start with this; a proposed relationship between 2 or more variables; answers aren’t usually a yes/no; usually 2 variables (independet and dependent); need to conclude with adequate confidence that 1 thing (x) causes another (y)

12
New cards

Confirmatory Research Question

imply a hypothesis; can conclude with a yes or no; ex. Do high levels of political polarization lead to civil war? Does a country’s industrialization decrease economic inequality among its citizens?

13
New cards

Exploratory Research Question

not designed for a yes or no; designed to have an open-ended answer; ex. How do ideas of masculinity influence Pakistani men’s decisions to join terrorist groups?

14
New cards

Independent Variable

variable you are changing; suppose it is influencing the other variable; ex. political polarization

15
New cards

Dependent Variable

out come; effect trying to explain; ex. civil war

16
New cards

3 Primary Goals of a Scientific Inquiry

validity, reliability, and generalizability

17
New cards

Validity

1 of 3 goals of scientific inquiry; refers to how we “operationalize” our variables; are we truly measuring what we claim to be studying?

18
New cards

Operationalize

to find something measureable that stands in for the thing we want to learn about

19
New cards

Reliability

1 of 3 goals of scientific inquiry; concerns the consistency of measurements (across time and observers)

20
New cards

Generalizability

1 of 3 goals of scientific inquiry; means the observations and findings of a specific study can be applied to other, diff. situations; what you observe in 1 context, can be obswerved in another; ex. population, ecological, and conceptual generalizability

21
New cards

Population Generalizability

to what extent does a sample represent the universe of cases?; hopefully smaple represents the population

22
New cards

Ecological Generalizability

to what extent are the findings from 1 setting also found in different settings? (lab → real world or 1 place/time → another); one setting to aonther; ex. conclusions about terrorist groups in 1 country would transfer to a diff. country/region

23
New cards

Conceptual Generalizability

aka robustness; to what extent would the findings be similar, if the variables were operationalized/measured differently; how would findings be different if variables were operationized differently

24
New cards

4 Causal Hurdles

  1. Is there covariation betrween X and Y?

  2. Is there a credible mechanism that connects X to Y?

  3. Can we rule out the possibility that Y could cause X?

  4. Have we controlled for all confounding variables (“Z” variables)


25
New cards

Is there a covariation between X and Y?

1 of 4 causal hurdles; i.e. correlation; is there some pattern between values of X and corressponding values of Y

26
New cards

Is there a credble causal mechanism that connects X to Y?

27
New cards
28
New cards
29
New cards
30
New cards
31
New cards
32
New cards
33
New cards
34
New cards
35
New cards