Midterm 2 Review Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/55

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards summarizing key concepts from the lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

56 Terms

1
New cards

SEM (Standard Error of Measurement)

Tells us how confident we are in our estimate of a student’s ability; the uncertainty in our inference of their true ability based on their responses.

2
New cards

Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)

A method where a computer adjusts the test based on a student's performance, updating the ability estimate using MLE or Bayesian methods.

3
New cards

Classical Test Theory (CTT)

A theory that posits every tester has a True score (T) and random error score (E) that altogether form observed score (X): X = T+E.

4
New cards

Item Response Theory (IRT)

A theory that estimates a student's latent ability (θ) on a continuous scale and the difficulty, discrimination, and guessing behavior of each item.

5
New cards

Discrimination (IRT)

How well an item distinguishes ability.

6
New cards

Difficulty (IRT)

The point on θ where the item is 50% likely to be answered correctly.

7
New cards

Guessing (IRT)

The chance a low-ability student gets an item right.

8
New cards

Rasch Model

A part of IRT that assumes EQUAL discrimination and only measures difference in difficulty

9
New cards

Logit Scale

Takes log-odds of raw scores → makes scale linear; linear with respect to the difference between person ability and item difficulty. RASCH MODEL


10
New cards

Item Difficulty (Item Analysis)

Proportion of people who got an item right.

11
New cards

Item Discrimination (Item Analysis)

Whether an item differentiates high vs. low scorers.

12
New cards

Angoff Method

A method for determining cut scores where subject matter experts examine each test item and estimate the probability that a minimally competent candidate would answer it correctly.

13
New cards

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

A component of the No Child Left Behind Act where states had to show progress, and schools that failed faced penalties.

14
New cards

Value Added Modeling (VAM)

A regression estimating a teacher’s/school’s “added value” to student test scores, controlling for prior performance/demographics.

15
New cards

NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress)

"Nation’s report card" conducted by US DOE, standardized across all states, for comparison.

16
New cards

Selection Bias

A problem in comparing student performance where students aren't randomly assigned, leading to skewed results.

17
New cards

problems with

External factors (e.g., SES, parental education) that differ between groups being compared, affecting the validity of comparisons.

18
New cards

Coleman Report (1966)

A public v private performance analysis using NAEP weighting scores based on socioeconomic status (SES).

19
New cards

No Excuses Schools

Charter schools aimed at serving low-income students of color with high expectations, strict discipline, and data-driven instruction.

20
New cards

Formative Assessment

Assessment used for feedback and improvement during the learning process.

21
New cards

Summative Assessment

Assessment used to judge performance at the end of a learning period.

22
New cards

Minimum Competency Exams (MCE)

Exit exams designed to ensure students have a minimal level of functional literacy/numeracy.

23
New cards

Standards-Based Exit Exams (SBEs)

Exit exams based on state academic standards.

24
New cards

Remediation

Targeted instruction given to students who failed a test, intended to help them meet the required standard on a retest.

25
New cards

Construct Validity

The extent to which a test actually measures the theoretical trait (construct) it's intended to measure.

26
New cards

Sensitivity (in Testing)

Ability to correctly identify true positives.
tpr = tp / (tp + Fn)

27
New cards

Specificity (in Testing)

Ability to correctly identify true negatives.

28
New cards

CAT (Computerized Adaptive Test)

All questions come from a calibrated item bank using IRT. Even though test forms differ, all students are evaluated against the same metric (θ), with equal opportunity to demonstrate mastery.

29
New cards

pushback against brown v board

Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education (1963) -GEORGIA

30
New cards

Nomothetic Approach

Seeks to discover general laws that apply to many people when studying personality.

31
New cards

Idiographic Approach

Seeks to understand the uniqueness of a single person when studying personality.

32
New cards

Face Validity

Items are written to reflect the content of a concept based on (i.e., looks like it measures what it should).

33
New cards

Criterion-Based Selection

Items are selected based on their ability to differentiate between known groups (e.g., depressed vs. non-depressed).

34
New cards

Construct-Based Selection

Items are selected and validated through theoretical models and factor analysis, aimed at measuring latent psychological constructs.

35
New cards

Trait

DIMENSION that exists on a scale (high, mediu, low ) - ex) big 5

36
New cards

Type

category (ex. introvert vs extro

37
New cards

Objective Tests

Objectively scored. Results don’t hinge on the examiner’s interpretation —only on the keyed answer sheet

38
New cards

Projective Tests

Uses images or storytelling to see how someone “projects” inner motives and conflicts into the response, which the clinician interprets.

39
New cards

Content Based

constructed by defining a theory first, and then writing questions that directly represent that theory. Relies on face validity: the questions look like they measure what they say.

40
New cards

IQ testing racism cases

diana vs state board of education; LARRY P vs Riles 1979; hobson v hansen 1967

41
New cards

debra p vs turlington, florida

Does requiring students to pass a graduation test—when they were never previously taught the material—violate their constitutional rights to due process and equal protection?

42
New cards

CONtrast group

2 groups w proficiency level relative to the standard is already known through some external, reliable means (e.g., teacher ratings, supervisor evaluations, performance on a different benchmark).

43
New cards

bookmarking

Items are then arranged in an "Ordered Item Booklet" (OIB) from easiest to hardest based on these IRT difficulty values. The booklet shows each item along with its statistical informatio

44
New cards

American schools are failing; we’re falling behind global competitors—especially Japan and the USSR.

1983: nation at risk

45
New cards

provided federal grants to states and local districts—if they developed "standards-based reform" plans. This means creating clear academic standards and aligning curricula and tests to them.

1994: Goals 2000

46
New cards
  • States set their own standards but had to show Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

  • Schools that failed to meet AYP faced penalties, restructuring, or closure\

  • Teaching to the test

2001 : No child left behind (NCLB) george bush

47
New cards

Make standards consistent across states; Detailed grade-by-grade standards

2010: common core standards (CCSB) / obama

48
New cards

3 ways to evaluate school success

  1. student achievement scores

  2. VAM

  3. operational (graduation rates teacher turnover)

49
New cards

types of exit exams

MCE, Standards-Based Exit Exams (SBEs), end of course exams (EOC

50
New cards

con. of exit exams

remediation

51
New cards

teaching TO the test vs teaching THE test

Narrow focus on item formats, drill, tricks vs Teaching the core skills the test claims to measure

52
New cards

what happens when u raise cut score for exit exam

less people fail → less likely to pass underqualifed ppl → increases specificity ( catch more underprepared students ) → more ‘ready’ ppl who can’t graduate

53
New cards

SEM remains high when

poorly matched/low discrimination items

54
New cards

low sensitivity

= high false neg = low true positive

55
New cards

dubers religious coping (defining latent traits)

construct based

56
New cards