1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Cohen’s d tells you
how big the differences is between 2 means in terms of SD (rather than whether the differences is statistically significant)
Percentage of variance accounted for (r²) tells you
how strong the relationship or effect is
Confidence Intervals is the range of values that are
most likely to contain the true population parameter if you repeated the study many times
basic logic of hypothesis is to always assume
treatment doesn’t work (the null hypothesis) [pessimistic]
Z-critical value increase as
α level decreases
When the α level is low, it becomes harder to
Reject the null hypothesis bc the rejection regions (outside the boundary, the two tails) move farther out
The smaller the α level, the
more trust you have for the null hypothesis
When T or Z score equals 0,
no difference → fail to reject (retain) the null hypothesis
Within the T or Z region like within ±1.96 equals
fail to reject (retain) the null hypothesis
Outside the T or Z region like anything that’s more or less than 1.96 equals
reject the null hypothesis
For big Z score, you want: …. population SD (σ)
small
For big Z score, you want: …. sample size (n)
big
For big Z score, you want: …. between sample mean (M) and pop mean (μ)
big differences
We want sample mean (M) to be
bigger than pop mean (μ) to get a more positive number
If p < 0.05 →
there is a significant differences meaning we reject the null hypothesis
is p > 0.05 →
there isn’t significant differences meaning we fail to reject (retain) the null hypothesis
T-critical value decreases as
df value increases (opposite of z)