1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Adverseness Doctrine
- Parties and issues have to be real, not hypothetical, and have to present conflicting claims RE a particular issue
Standing Doctrine
- Individuals have to show personal injury and prove other remedies have been exhausted
- Injury cannot be hypothetical or premonitory
Standing Doctrine Cases
- Frothingham v Mellon
- Lujuan v Defenders of Wildlife
- Flast v Cohen
- Griswold v CN
Ripeness Doctrine
- Cases are rejected because injury claimed has not occurred or other avenues of appeal haven't been considered
Mootness Doctrine
- Prevents courts from ruling on cases that no longer require a decision
Political Questions Doctrine
- Courts will not hear cases involving issues that are best left to the political branches (Congress or the President) rather than the judiciary
Strict Necessity Doctrine
- Cases must be heard on the strictest and narrowest grounds
strict
- Courts should only decide on constitutional issues when absolutely necessary to resolve a case
Stare Decisis
"Let the decision stand" Decisions are based on precedents from previous cases