Chp 11 - Court Methods and Challenges: Sentencing and Punishment

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/45

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

46 Terms

1
New cards

George Bernard Shaw Quote

If you are going to punish a man retributively, you must harm him. If you are going to reform him, you must improve him. Men are not improved by injury

2
New cards

Four Goals of Correction/ Punishment

Retribution

Deterrence

Incapacitation

Rehabilitation

3
New cards

Retribution

payback

revenge

harsh punishments

punishment fits the crime

4
New cards

Deterrence

preventing crime

Two types:

General

Specific

5
New cards

General Deterrence

others are prevented from committing the crime

6
New cards

Specific Deterrence

applies to that individual

that individual is prevented from committing the same crime

relies on classical school of criminology’s thought that crime is rational and defendants choose to commit crime after weighing the pros and cons

7
New cards

Incapacitation

defendant is physically unable to commit crime

Ex: Incarceration, electronic monitoring, house arrest

8
New cards

Rehabilitation

meant to improve the defendant

EX: substance abuse treatment

education

vocational skills

successfully integrate into society

9
New cards

Factors that Affect Punishment

1) Financial and/ or Social Benefit or Cost

2) Victim’s Wishes

3) Victim Impact Statements

4) Eighth Amendment

5) Influence of Prosecutor and Defense Attorney

6) Seriousness of Offense Itself

7) Defendant’s Prior Record

10
New cards

Financial and/ or Social Benefit or Cost

national average to incarcerate 1 person for 1 year is $35,000

11
New cards

Victim’s Wishes

DOESNT mean they always get what they want, but prosecutor will take it into consideration

12
New cards

Victim Impact Statement

aggravating (makes it more serious) and mitigating (makes it less serious) circumstances

13
New cards

Eighth Amendment

Cruel and Unusual Punishment Protection Amendment

14
New cards

Seriousness of Offense Itself

Most Important Factor

15
New cards

Defendant’s Prior Record

Habitual Offender laws

If you commit a 3rd offense then by law, your sentence will be longer

16
New cards

Models or Eras of Punishment

1) Colonial Model (1600s-1790s)

2) Penitentiary Model (1790s - 1870s)

3) Reformatory Model (1870s - 1890s)

4) Progressive Model (1890s - 1930s)

5) Medical Model (1930s - 1960s)

6) Community Model (1960s - 1970s)

7) Crime Control Model (1970s - Present)

17
New cards

Colonial Model (1600s - 1790s)

characterized by harsh punishments

Puritans who zealously prosecuted what they believed were violations of religious doctrine/ law

(Ex: Salem Witch Trials - Executions, Banishment from Community)

18
New cards

Penitentiary Model (1790s - 1870s)

Quakers believed social isolation of offenders would lead to remorse or penitence

First American Penitentiary Opens

19
New cards

First American Penitentiary

Walnut Street Jail in Philadelphia in 1790

20
New cards

Reformatory Model (1870s - 1890s)

moved away from social isolation of Penitentiary Model

Believed that isolation was detrimental to offenders

Focused on rehabilitation of Defendant

Rise of Indeterminate Sentences

21
New cards

Progressive Model (1890s - 1930s)

crime was a result of social conditions

not an individual problem

to reduce crime, social change was needed

underlying conditions that cause crime must be addressed

probation was launched as an alternative to incarceration

22
New cards

Medical Model (1930s - 1960s)

believed that criminals are inherently different than non-criminals

criminals have some kind of biological, sociological, or psychological deficiency

to reduce crime, must treat deficiency

23
New cards

Community Model (1960s - 1970s)

community reintegration was the focus

prisons were seen as artificial institutions that did not help defendant BUT perpetuating crime

would only send most serious offense to prison

try to keep lesser offenses in the community

even serious offender CAN be rehabilitated and be returned to the community

24
New cards

Crime Control Model (1970s - Present)

Focus on harsher punishment

Rise in habitual offender laws

Determinate sentencing

25
New cards

Types of Sentences

Determinate

Indeterminate

Concurrent

Consecutive

26
New cards

Determinate

fixed amount of time with no possibility of parole (ex: 5 yrs)

27
New cards

Indeterminate

range with a minimum and maximum (Ex: 5-10 yrs)

Must serve minimum, then you may become eligible for parole

28
New cards

Concurrent

sentences will run at the same time

whatever longest sentence is is how much time needs to be served

(ex: 3 counts of possession; one count is 2 yrs, 2nd is 5 yrs, third is 10yrs; you only serve 10 years instead of 17)

29
New cards

Consecutive

each sentence runs after previous sentence

serve all of count 1, then all of count 2, and so on…

add ALL sentences together to get time served

30
New cards

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

only uses determinate sentencing structure

Sentencing Reform Act

31
New cards

Sentencing Reform Act

goal: to ensure that defendants who commit similar crimes receive a similar sentence

32
New cards

Reforms

Rehabilitation was dropped as a goal of punishment

Created US Sentencing Commission

ALL sentences are determinate and NO POSSIBILITY of Parole

Authorized Appellate review of sentences - no review of conviction

33
New cards

US Sentencing Commission

tasked with created federal sentencing guidelines

34
New cards

Victim Impact Statements in Detail

given by victim at sentencing NOT at trial but after guilty verdict

______ can discuss how crime has affected them

Restrictions

35
New cards

Restrictions to Victim Impact Statements

CANNOT offer opinions about Defendant

CANNOT include sentencing recommendations

CANNOT offer opinions about crime

36
New cards

Usually victims HAVE to be the one who gives the statement, but there are EXCEPTIONS

Physical or Mental Disability

Victim is deceased

Victim is a Minor - Parent can Speak on Their Behalf

Depending on Jurisdiction, Statements may be given orally, written (read by victim or judge, or allow for a prerecorded audio and/or visual statement

37
New cards

Opposition to Victim Statements

Challenged on grounds that they give too much power to the state to enact harsh punishment

Supreme Court has upheld victim impact statements

38
New cards

Arguments FOR Capital Punishment

Defendant Deserved It - Crime was Cruel

Defendant is TOO DANGEROUS or VIOLENT for any other punishment

Is a good, SPECIFIC deterrent for that Defendant

39
New cards

Arguments AGAINST Capital Punishment

Too Cruel

Possibility of Killing the Wrong/Innocent Person

Human Life

More expensive to Offer __________

Not good, General Deterrent 

Discriminatory - African Americans

40
New cards

As of 2021, how many states have abolished the death penalty 

23

41
New cards

Supreme Court Decisions on Capital Punishment/ Death Penalty

Furman v Georgia (1972)

Gregg v Georgia (1976)

Roper v Simmons (2005)

42
New cards

Furman v Georgia (1972)

First time that Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional - Vote 5 to 4

43
New cards

Gregg v Georgia (1976)

death penalty DIDNT violate 8th amendment, and is allowable

aggravating and mitigating circumstances must be taken into account

Two Requirements for Death Penalty under this Case

Vote 7 to 2

44
New cards

Two Requirements for Death Penalty under Gregg v Georgia 

MUST have at least ONE aggravating factor/circumstance and it must be beyond a reasonable doubt 

Aggravating Circumstances MUST OUTWEIGH Mitigating Circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt

45
New cards

Roper v Simmons (2005)

Supreme Court ruled that anyone under 18 AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME CANNOT receive the death penalty

46
New cards

Things to Know About Death Penalty

Mentally Incompetent CANNOT receive death penalty

Victim MUST DIE for Defendant to receive death penalty (Except for Crimes against the Govt i.e. Treason and Espionage)

Opposition to Death penalty CANNOT Automatically disqualify you from Jury