gov supreme court cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

24 Terms

1
New cards

gitlow v ny

ny was allowed to punish gitlow for publishing radical wartime pamphlets, connected freedom of speech to state government, principle of selective incorporation

2
New cards

near v minnesota

prior restraint is unconstitutional, incorporation of protecting freedom of the press, states cant censor publication in advance unless national security

3
New cards

lemon v kurtzman

lemon test for establishment clause (preventing the government from establishing a religion), whether state law violates establishment clause

4
New cards

engel v vitale

state sponsored prayer in schools are unconstitutional even if voluntary

5
New cards

schenck v us

speech not protected if it presents a clear and present danger (WWI, encouraging men to resist and refuse the draft)

6
New cards

brandenburg v ohio

"imminent lawless test", can't punish speech unless its directed to produce/incite imminent lawless action

7
New cards

nyt vs us

pentagon papers vietnam war, government must reach a very high bar to justify censorship of the press, vague claims of national security must be proven to be substantiated

8
New cards

nyt v sullivan

in order for politicians to be able to sue for libel (using false statements to damage one's reputation), must be able to prove statement was made with "actual malice" + author knew statement was false and acted with recklessness (politicians should know what they are getting themselves into)

9
New cards

texas v johnson

flag burning is not illegal just because some find it offensive

10
New cards

tinker v des moines

black arm bands protesting vietnam war, symbolic speech is protected and schools can only limit speech if the school can prove it will disrupt educational process

11
New cards

wisconsin v yoder

free exercise clause, right to practice, law to send children to school until 16 yrs was a violation of amish citizens' right to practice their religion

12
New cards

us v lopez

Carrying a gun in school was not a form of "interstate commerce", federal gov cant pass a law banning guns in school, limited power of the commerce clause

13
New cards

miranda v arizona

fifth amendment's protection against self-incrimination, miranda rights, right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning

14
New cards

mapp v ohio

exclusionary rule, prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in court. selective incorporation by applying 4th amendment (illegal searches and seizures) to states and state courts

15
New cards

gideon v wainwright

selective incorporation for sixth amendment's right to an attorney, including for defendents that can't afford an attorney themselves

16
New cards

hazelwood school district v kuhlmeier

Schools are allowed to put stricter limitations on school-sponsored speech as long as they have a legitimate concern, didn't allow student journalists to publish articles that covered topics on divorce and teen pregnancy

17
New cards

reynolds v us

bigamy, marrying multiple partners, establishment clause doesn't protect actions that threaten "public order, saftey, or morality", bigamy illegal

18
New cards

DC v heller

DC ban on handguns, states can regulate guns but ban was unconstitutional, strengthened 2nd amendment

19
New cards

mcdonald v chicago

supreme court overruled a chicago ban on handgun ownership, selective incorporation, 2nd amendment -> state/local policies

20
New cards

griswold v connecticut

married couple's right to privacy exteneded to contraceptives, BoR connected to privacy

21
New cards

uc regents v bakke

race could be considered as part of narrowly tailored policy, racial quotas unconstitutional (uc davis med school)

22
New cards

grutter v bollinger

supreme court said policy was ok, michigan had affirmative action policy aimed at achieving critical mass of underrepresented minority groups

23
New cards

gratz v bollinger

point system that awarded points to minority candidates, unconstitutional

24
New cards

new jersey v tlo

probable clause, if there is a valid reason to search without a warrant, schools need to maintain order and certain freedoms must be balanced, searches based on "reasonable suspicion" not probable clause