1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Hate crime definition:
‘any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards someone based on a personal characteristic’
Babbs 2007:
D racist to V in a shop
Situation diffused
15 mins later, D headbutted V
Convicted of racist hate crime
Pal 2000:
D & V both asian
D ejected from community centre by V
Called V a ‘white mans arse licker’ & attacked him
Convicted but on appeal it was held it wasn’t racially aggravated as his remarks were motivated by anger
The remark wasn’t aimed at racial group, but to his relationship with white people
Cain v CPS 2022:
D black, V black police officer
V arrested another black man
Said ‘this N word abusing his own kind’
Arrested, but D said in black community n-word isn’t malicious
Conviction still upheld
Religious and racially aggravated offence PQ:
Identify basic offence
Discuss fault element, AR/MR
Identify if there was a demonstration of hostility s28(11)(a)
If not, identify whether offence was motivated by hostility s28(1)(b)
If either 28(1)(a) or 28(1)(b) apply, iy can be prosecuted as an aggravated offence against the person
Consent to non-fatal OAP, R v Brown:
Group involved in sado-masochistic encounters
Everyone consented
Videoed and police found video
5 men charged with s47 & 20
Pleaded guilty but appealed conviction due to consent
Judgement: once we get to a level of bodilt harm, consent doesn’t matter. No exception created as there’s no good reason
Criticised, law shouldn’t interfere with consent. No medical needed, no serious harm so why??
Wilson 1996:
Husband burned initials into wife’s arm
Got infected & medical intervention was needed
Wilson convicted but released
Not in public interest such that consensual activity between husband and wife in the privacy of the matrimonial home should be a matter for criminal investigation or prosecution under 47
Exceptional categories where no liability is due:
Surgery
Tattoo/piercing (BM 2018 bodily modifications not included)
Sport
Horseplay (consent to risk of injury, Aitken 1992)
Religious flagellation
Circumcision
Sexual/reckless transmission of a disease; NOT intentional transmission (Dica 2024, Konzani 2005)