1/75
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
How is motivation defined in sport psychology?
Motivation is the direction, intensity, and persistence of effort:
Motivation literally means “to move”
👉 Amotivation = no movement or drive
Motivation: Direction
(choice): what you choose to do
Motivation: Intensity
(effort): how hard you try
Motivation: Persistence
Persistence: how long you continue, especially through adversity
What does SEP focus on when studying motivation?
Three key questions:
Initiation: Why people start
Sustaining participation: Why people continue
Discontinuation: Why people quit
REMEMBER: What gets you into a sport ≠ what keeps you there
Studying Motivation: Initiation
Why people start
Studying Motivation: Sustaining Participation
Why people continue
Studying Motivation: Discontinuation
Why people quit
What are the three approaches to studying motivation in SEP and how do they differ?
Trait approach: Motivation = personality (“you have it or you don’t”) → ❌ too simplistic
Situation approach: Motivation = environment → ❌ ignores the person
Interactional approach: Motivation = personality + environment → ✔ MOST accurate
Approach to Studying Motivation: Trait Approach
Motivation is a function of personality
—> either you have it or you don’t
too simplistic
Approach to Studying Motivation: Situation Approach
Motivation is a function of environment
ignores person, says person doesn’t bring anything to it
Approach to Studying Motivation: Interactional approach
motivation is a function of personality & environment/situation!
—>Most accurate/most widely used
In the interactional approach, what factors combine to influence motivation?
Personal factors: personality, goals, needs, interests
Situational factors: coach style, team success, environment
Motivation = interaction between person + situation
Interactional Approach to Studying Motivation: Personal factors
personality, goals, needs, interests
Interactional Approach to Studying Motivation: Situational factors
coach style, team success, environment
(facilities, teammates)
What is Guideline 1 for building motivation and why is it important?
Consider both traits and situation
—> Avoid assuming “they aren’t trying”
—> Behavior may be caused by the environment (e.g., boredom), not personality
What is Guideline 2 for building motivation and how does it apply?
Understand multiple motives for participation
👉 Motives differ by age, level, and context
Building Motivation: Youth motives
Fun (MOST important)
Friends/belonging
Skill improvement
Fitness
Self-esteem
Winning (LOW importance)
Building Motivation: Youth Motives KEY INSIGHT
Kids prefer playing and losing > sitting and winning
Why youth quit:
Negative experiences (often coach-related)
Social issues (cliques)
Coaches not understanding sampling years! —> deliberate play vs deliberate practice
Why Youth Quit: Sampling Years
Deliberate Play: creating game like situations, maximum involvement —> more effective
Deliberate Practice: constant practical application, lots of drill/rules —> Not as effective
Youth Sport “Dropout” Misinformation 1
Sport Withdrawal is permanent
Youth Sport ‘Dropout” Misinformation 2
Discontinuing activities is atypical of growing youth
Youth Sport “Dropout” Misinformation 3
Reasons for attrition are tied to initial reasons for participation —> unmet expectations, changing circumstances, or dissatisfaction with the original value proposition drive disengagement
What is Guideline 3 for building Motivation?:
CHANGE THE ENVIRONMENT TO ENHANCE MOTIVATION
Modify practices, coaching style, team culture
What is Guideline 4 for building Motivation?
INFLUENCE MOTIVATION
Focus on effort (not just outcome)
Process > outcome
Builds long-term motivation
What is Guideline 5 for Building Motivation?
USE BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION to CHANGE undesirable participant movtives
Rewards/reinforcement (especially for younger athletes)
Fun Integration Theory (Avoiding Youth Disengagement)
Cohesion —> social fundamentals
Mastery Climate —> Internal/contextual fundamentals
Supportive environments & team distinction belonging
Fun Integration Theory: 1. Cohesion
Social Fundamentals
Friends!
supporting need to have & make friends
Fun Integration Theory 2: Mastery Climate
Internal/contextual fundamentals
focus on improvement !
focus on process over outcome
allows for gaining of confidence & skill
Fun Integration Theory 3: Supportive Environments & Team Distinction/Belonging
External Fundamentals: keeping a finger on parents, the sidelines that influence motivation of Youth athletes
Support affiliation & sense of belonging
Motivation: Two Key Constructs (related but not identical)
Achievement Motivation
Competitiveness
Motivation Key Construct 1: Achievement Motivation
A person’s effort to:
master a task
achieve excellence
overcome obstacles
perform better than others
take pride in exercising talent
Motivation Key Construct 2: Competitiveness
the drive to strive for satisfaction when making comparisons with a standard of excellence
think of having a standard out in the public/public goal/record to be met
Motivational theories in sport
Need Achievement Theory
Attribution Theory
Achievement Goal Theory
Competence Motivation theory
Motivational theories in sport 1: Need Achievement Theory
Interactional view of how 5 components intersect (AFFECT) & what achievement looks like
Personality Factors (Motives)
Situational Factors
Resultant Tendencies
Emotional Reaction
Achievement-related behaviors
Motivational theories in sport 1: Need Achievement Theory is essentially…
Motivation = interaction of: Personality + situation
People are motivated by either:
Achieving success
Avoiding failure
High vs Low Achievers:
High achievers:
Seek challenges
Focus on success
Feel pride
Low achievers:
Avoid risk OR choose impossible tasks
Focus on failure
Feel shame
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: PERSONALITY FACTORS
Personality can affect motives:
TO ACHIEVE SUCESS
OR
TO AVOID FAILURE
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: SITUATIONAL FACTORS
The probability of success in the situation affects motivation
The incentive value of success in the situation —> what do I get out of it? How much is at stake?
Athletes trying to be successful vs avoid failure look at situational factors differently
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: RESULTANT TENDENCIES
an individual’s achievement motive levels in relation to situational factors
HIGH ACHIEVERS: seek out optimally challenging situations, focus on probability of success & incentive value is not as important —> will try their best regardless
LOW ACHIEVERS: seeking out easy situation to AVOID FAILURE, would choose something very hard because failure is expected, competency not at risk
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: RESULTANT TENDENCIES of HIGH ACHIEVERS
seek out optimally challenging situations, focus on probability of success & incentive value is not as important —> will try their best regardless
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: RESULTANT TENDENCIES of LOW ACHIEVERS
seeking out easy situation to AVOID FAILURE, would choose something very hard because failure is expected, competency not at risk
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: EMOTIONAL REACTIONS
How much pride or shame a person experiences: Where do they focus?
high achievers: will find pride in most situation
low achievers: will be stuck on mistakes & shame
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: EMOTIONAL REACTIONS of HIGH ACHIEVERS
will find pride in most situations, even if goal is not met
can pick out moment they did well/what they did well
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: EMOTIONAL REACTIONS of LOW ACHIEVERS
will be stuck on what they didn’t do well
focusing on feelings of shame for making mistakes
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: ACHIEVEMENT BEHAVIOR
How do the other 4 components interact to influence behavior?
High achievers: typically have higher & more consistent performance outcomes
Low achievers; usually don’t reach potential & performances all over the board
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: ACHIEVEMENT BEHAVIOR of HIGH ACHIEVERS
typically have higher & more consistent performance outcomes
Motivation Theory in Sport: 1: Need Achievement Theory: ACHIEVEMENT BEHAVIOR of LOW ACHIEVERS
usually don’t reach potential & performances all over the board
Motivation Theory in Sport 2: Attribution Theory
What are attributions?: HOW PEOPLE EXPLAIN THEIR SUCCESS & FAILURE
Relativity to sport participation/performance: either influences or reveals motivation & impacts future expectancy of success & failure
Motivation Theory in sport 2: Attribution Theory: What Types of Attributions are there? ex)
Winning: hard work, training, dedication, coaching, easy competition, spiritual, team work etc.
Losing: bad game, tired, ref/bad call, weather/field (conditions essentially)
Research shows oftentimes, losses are externalized
Motivation Theory in sport 2: Attribution Theory: What Types of Attributions are there?
Internal (effort, ability)
External (luck, refs)
Stable (ability)
Unstable (effort)
Controllable vs uncontrollable
Motivation Theory in sport 2: Attribution Theory: Key Takeaway
Motivation is strongest when athletes:
Attribute outcomes to internal + controllable factors (like effort)
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory
People seek to demonstrate high ability (success) & avoid demonstrating low ability (failure)
People define success differently depending on their GOAL ORIENTATION
Essentially, people are motivated by how they define success
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory Orientations
Task: process, mastery —> person with this goal orientation define success on personal improvement “Am I getting better?”
Outcome: Ego oriented —> definition of success is outdoing others, generally winning
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory Task Orientation
process, mastery —> person with this goal orientation define success on personal improvement “Am I getting better?”
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory Ego Orientation
Ego oriented —> definition of success is outdoing others, generally winning
not best/ideal for lower level sports
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory in action: TASK APPROACH Oriented
Best
I want to swim a personal record in this race
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory in action: TASK AVOIDANCE Oriented
I don’t want to swim slower than my personal record in this race
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory in action: EGO APPROACH Oriented
I want to score on that goal keeper & win the game
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory in action: EGO AVOIDANCE Oriented
Worst
I don’t want that goal keeper to stop my shots & loose the game
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Achievement Goal Theory: Impact of Goal Orientations
WHAT ASPECTS OF SPORT WILL A PERSON’S GOAL ORIENTATION IMPACT?
•Attributions: people who are task oriented are more likely to contribute success and failures to things in their control, ego orientated put failures on something else
•Enjoyment: ppl/ who are task oriented report higher levels of enjoyment, ppl who are ego oriented report higher levels of anxiety
•Injury rehabilitation: ppl w/ego orientation more likely to go into catastrophic thinking
•Task choice: ppl/who have task orientation are more likely to pick optimally challenging situations, ego oriented ppl will pick task that will be more likely to win
•Perceived competence: ppl w/task orientation report higher levels of perceived confidence & believing they can grow/change
•Intrinsic motivation: task motivation is connected to higher levels of intrinsic motivation (personal satisfaction)
•Purpose of sport: ppl w/task orientation see sport as holistic thing, PART of who they are, pp w/ego orientation define themself as an athlete in a detrimental way
Legitimacy of poor sportsmanship: task orientation person will justify it in quest to beat someone/win (more likely to cheat)
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Competency Motivation Theory
The basic human need is to demonstrate competence
Perceptions of control, self-worth, & competence evaluations influence affective/emotional states
“I can produce this outcome” —> feelings of this affected by how we feel we can control/level of control etc
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Competency Motivation Theory: Important Constructs
•Self-esteem
•Perceived competence
•Perceived control
•Motivational orientations (Task or ego oriented)
•Affect (enjoyment/stress)
•Feedback/reinforcement from significant others
•Success/failure
Motivation Theory in Sport 3: Competency Motivation Theory: Perceptions of control work w/self worth & competence
high self esteem + competence + high percieved control = increased motivation!
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Motivational Orientation: High Achiever
•High motivation to achieve success
•Low motivation to avoid failure
Focuses on pride of success
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Motivational Orientation: Low Achiever
•Low motivation to achieve success
•High motivation to avoid failure
•Focuses on shame and worry resulting from failure
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Attributions: High Achiever
•Attributes success to stable and internal factors w/in one’s control
Ascribes failure to unstable and external factors outside of their control
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Attributions: Low Achiever
•Attributes success to unstable and external factors outside of their control
•Ascribes failure to stable and internal factors w/in one’s control
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Goals adopted: High achiever
incremental or task goal
approach goals
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Goals adopted: Low achiever
entity or outcome goal
avoidance goals
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Perceived Competence & Control: High Achiever
•High perceived competence and believes that achievement is within one’s control
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Perceived Competence & Control: Low Achiever
•Low perceived competence and believes achievement is outside one’s control
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Task Choice: High Achiever
•Seeks out challenges and able competitors and tasks
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: Task Choice: Low Achiever
•Avoids challenges, seeks out very easy or very difficult tasks or competitors
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: performance conditions: High achiever
performs well in evaluative conditions
What Theories of Motivation Tell Us: performance conditions: Low Achiever
performs poorly in evaluative conditions