CNIT 322 Exam 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/80

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

81 Terms

1
New cards

Ways of Knowing

- Tenacity

- Intuition

- Authority

- Discourse and Logic

- Empiricism

Rationalism and Empiricism are the ONLY good ways of knowing.

2
New cards

What is science?

Science = Rationalism + Empiricism

3
New cards

Ideomotor effect

A psychological phenomenon wherein a subject makes unconscious movements.

4
New cards

Attributes of scientific thinking

- Determinism

- Discoverability

- Objectivity

- Data-driven

- Empirical questions

5
New cards

Determinism

Events have causes.

6
New cards

Discoverability

These causes can be uncovered using science.

7
New cards

Objectivity

Eliminating bias and subjectivity.

8
New cards

Data-driven

Evidence-based conclusions.

9
New cards

Empirical questions

Questions answered through some systematic procedure.

10
New cards

Confirmation bias

The tendency to search for information that supports one's beliefs while ignoring contrary information.

11
New cards

Belief perseverance

A closed-minded unwillingness to consider any evidence that is contrary to a strongly held belief.

12
New cards

Pseudoscience

It uses unscientific methods, theories, assumptions, and conclusions that pretend to be scientific. It relies on anecdotal evidence.

13
New cards

Anecdotal evidence

Evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily on personal testimony.

14
New cards

Parsimony / Occam's Razor

The explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible.

15
New cards

Inferences

The purpose of research is to draw valid inferences from research.

16
New cards

Logical fallacies

An error in reasoning.

17
New cards

Ad Hominem

Attacking your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.

18
New cards

Strawman

Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.

19
New cards

Argument from Authority

Using the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument.

20
New cards

Texas Sharp Shooter

Cherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument, or finding a pattern to fit a presumption.

21
New cards

Moving the Goalposts

Moving the goalposts to create exceptions when a claim is shown to be false.

22
New cards

No True Scotsman

Making what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of an argument.

23
New cards

Black and White

Where two alternative states are presented as the only possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist.

24
New cards

Fallacy Fallacy

Presuming that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that it is necessarily wrong.

25
New cards

Ad Hominem Tu Quoque

Avoiding having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - answering criticism with criticism.

26
New cards

Slippery Slope

Asserting that if we allow A to happen, then Z will consequently happen too, therefore A should not happen.

27
New cards

Red Herring

An irrelevant topic introduced in an argument to divert the attention of listeners or readers from the original issue.

28
New cards

Ecological Fallacy

Assumption that relationships at the group level also apply to the individual level.

29
New cards

Exception Fallacy

Assumptions are made about a group because of observations of an individual/case.

30
New cards

Selective laziness

We are more likely to scrutinize evidence when the evidence is contradictory. Our evaluations tend to only be thorough when we disagree.

31
New cards

3 types of scientific misconduct

- Falsifying Data

- Misrepresenting Procedures

- Duplications of findings

32
New cards

Nuremberg Code (1947)

A set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the subsequent Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.

33
New cards

Nuremberg Principles

1. Voluntary, informed consent is essential.

3. Research based on previous knowledge.

4. Avoid physical and mental suffering if possible.

6. Risks do not exceed anticipated benefits.

9. Ability to quit the study at any time without repercussion.

34
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki (1964)

(most recent update in 2013)

The World Medical Association reinterpreted the Nuremberg Code. The conditions of consent are relaxed and human experimentation is changed to clinical research. Researchers must follow local legislation, but are held to a higher standard of morality. There have been SEVEN revisions since its creation, and it requires the dissemination of both positive and negative findings.

35
New cards

Institutional Review Board

A revision in 1974 to the Declaration of Helsinki called for an oversight committee, known as the Institutional Review Board.

36
New cards

Stanley Milgram study (1965)

A series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram. They measured the willingness of study participants, men from a diverse range of occupations with varying levels of education, to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a "learner." These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.

This study caused the participants psychological harm.

37
New cards

Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1933-1972)

An infamous, unethical, and malicious clinical study conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The purpose of this study was to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis in rural African-American men in Alabama under the guise of receiving free health care from the United States government. The study was conducted to understand the disease's natural history throughout time and to also determine proper treatment dosage for specific people and the best time to receive injections of treatments.

38
New cards

Belmont Report (1979)

It established the guidelines for IRBs.

1. Respect for persons

- Voluntariness

- Mental capacity

- Informed consent

- Privacy

2. Beneficence

- Minimize harm / maximize benefits

- Contribute to scientific knowledge

3. Justice

- Treat people fairly

- Select subjects equitably

- Avoid exploitation of populations of convenience

39
New cards

Menlo Report (2012)

It established guidelines for computer and information security research. It added a new ethical principle - "respect for law and public interest."

40
New cards

Eugenics

The science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. Developed largely by Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, it fell into disfavor only after the perversion of its doctrines by the Nazis.

41
New cards

Data

Facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis.

42
New cards

Facts

Directly, empirically, and repeatedly observed.

43
New cards

Constructs

Rational ideas developed by researchers.

44
New cards

Reification of a construct

Confusing a construct as fact.

45
New cards

Inductive reasoning

Specific observation to general statements.

46
New cards

Deductive reasoning

General observation to specific statements.

47
New cards

Theory

A formalized set of concepts that summarizes and organizes observation and inferences.

48
New cards

Falsifiability (Popper)

Falsifiability, according to the philosopher Karl Popper, defines the inherent testability of any scientific hypothesis. It is the assertion that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory.

49
New cards

Hypothesis

A proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.

50
New cards

Basic research

Designed to increase scientific understanding of phenomena without any particular consideration for application.

51
New cards

Applied research

The goal is to find solutions to practical problems.

52
New cards

Levels of constraint

The degree to which the researchers impose limits or controls on any part of the research process.

53
New cards

List of constraints (least to most)

1. Naturalistic observation (least)

2. Case-study method

3. Correlational research

4. Differential research (pre-existing variable)

5. Experimental research (most)

54
New cards

Independent variable

The variable actively manipulated by the researcher to see what its impact will be on other variables.

55
New cards

Dependent variable

The variable hypothesized to be affected by the independent variable manipulation (the outcome variable).

56
New cards

Constant / control variable

Any variables that are prevented from varying.

57
New cards

Extraneous variable (third variable, lurking variable, plausible alternative explanation)

Another variable that might affect the dependent variable.

58
New cards

Sample

A subset of a population that is measured or studied to provide insight to an overall population.

59
New cards

Population

The abstract idea of a large group of many cases where a researcher draws a sample.

60
New cards

Levels of measurement

- Nominal (grouping) scales

- Ordinal scales

- Interval scales

- Ratio scales

61
New cards

Nominal (grouping) scales

Categorical and arbitrary.

62
New cards

Ordinal scales

Ranked by magnitude.

63
New cards

Interval scales

Ranked and equal intervals - no true zero.

64
New cards

Ratio scales

All properties of a number system.

65
New cards

Measurement error

A distortion in the scores so that they no longer reflect reality. It occurs with response bias, reactivity, social desirability, or instrument error.

66
New cards

Measurement qualities

- Exhaustive

- Mutually exclusive

67
New cards

Exhaustive

Classify every observation in terms of one of the attributes composing the variable.

68
New cards

Mutually exclusive

Classify every observation in terms of one and only one attribute.

69
New cards

Reliability

The degree to which an assessment tool produces stable and consistent results.

70
New cards

Reliability evidence

- Interrater

- Test-retest

- Internal consistency

71
New cards

Interrater

Blind ratings are consistent from different observers.

72
New cards

Test-retest

Similar scores produced over time (assessing stability).

73
New cards

Internal consistency

Measures one construct with several observations or items.

74
New cards

Validity

The findings truly represent the phenomenon being measured.

75
New cards

Predictor and criterion

The predictor variable is analogous to an independent variable and is used to predict an outcome (the criterion variable).

76
New cards

Probabilistic sampling

Utilizes a form of random selection which allows researchers to predict what is happening in the larger population from which the sample came from. Examples: simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, and systematic random sampling.

77
New cards

Non-probabilistic sampling

Population distributions are unknown, so it cannot rely on random selection. Examples: convenience sample, snowball sample.

78
New cards

Operational definition

The definition of a variable in terms of the actual procedures used by the researcher to measure and/or manipulate it.

79
New cards

Null hypothesis

Differences due to chance, not manipulation. If a significant difference is found, the null hypothesis is rejected.

80
New cards

Alternative non-directional hypothesis

A difference due to manipulation, but not chance. A non-directional hypothesis starts with "there is a difference."

81
New cards

Alternative directional hypothesis

A difference due to manipulation, but not chance. A directional hypothesis involves increasing/decreasing, more/less, high/low.