1/65
Topics that could show up on final: Midterm 2: Lecture 7 - Groups & Teamwork (Slides 1-19 ) Lecture 8 - Motivation 1 (Slides 20-29) Lecture 9 - Motivation 2 (Slides 30-35) Lecture 10 - Decision Making 1 (Slide 36) Lecture 11 - Decision Making 2 (Slides 37-55) Lecture 12 - Negotiation (Slides 56 - Lecture 13 - Negotiation 2 - Empty
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is a group/team?
Two or more people interacting interdependently to achieve a common goal
When should one use groups?
Relatively certain or complex problem
Problem that requires cooperation
Acceptance of and commitment to a decision are critical for implementation
Does Group size and satisfaction have a negative or positive relationship? Why?
Negative Relationship
More conflict
More social inhibition (less participation in larger groups)
Individual contributions harder to recognize
Can reduce identification with group
What are the three types of tasks that correspond with Group size and group performance?
Additive Tasks
Disjunctive Tasks
Conjunctive Tasks
Define Additive Tasks:
Group performance depends on the sum of the performance of individual group members
Ex: Building a house
Define Disjunctive Tasks:
Group performance is dependent on the performance of the best group member
Ex: An escape room with a very intelligent group member
The probability that the group includes a superior performer increases with group size
Define Conjunctive Tasks:
Group performance is limited by the performance of the worst group member
Performance is hindered by the weakest link
Ex: An assembly line operation
The probability that the group includes a weak link increases with group size
For additive and disjunctive tasks, do bigger teams mean better performance?
Yes, but not quite
Actual performance = Potential Performance - Process Loss
Process Loss: Group performance difficulties stemming from the problems of motivating and coordinating large groups
What is the difference between Surface and Group Diversity?
Surface Diversity: Visible characteristics
Age, gender, race
Group Diversity: Differences in attitudes toward work or how to accomplish a goal
Experiences, values, personalities, culture, religion
Compare Demographically Homogeneous Teams and Demographically Heterogeneous (Diverse) Teams
Demographically Homogeneous Teams:
Less conflict
faster team development
Perform better on cooperative tasks
Better coordination
Demographically Heterogeneous (Diverse) Teams:
More conflict
Longer team development
Perform better on complex problems
More creative
What is Team Cohesion/Cohesiveness?
The degree to which a group is attractive to its group members
Cognitive & Behavioural (Task Cohesion)
Members believe the team will fulfill goals and needs
Emotional (Social Cohesion)
Team is part of person’s social identity
What is Social Loafing?
Social Loafing: The tendency to withhold physical or intellectual effort when performing a group task.
Motivation loss
Comes in two different forms
The Free Rider Effect
People reduce effort to get a free ride at the expense of their fellow group members
The Sucker Effect
People reduce effort because of the feeling that others are free riding
How can one counteract Social Loafing?
Make individual performance more visible
Smaller teams
Specialized tasks
Goal setting for each individual
Increase feelings of indispensability
Performance feedback
Make sure the work is interesting
If work is engaging, intrinsic motivation should counteract social loafing
Reward group performance
What is the Group Development Process?
Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Adjourning
Explain Forming:
Members come together for collective goals; impression management
Explain Storming:
Members compete for roles and power; individual goals; poor cohesion
Where conflict between group members arise
Explain Norming:
Members settle into roles; accepts group norms and set collective goals; cohesion improves
Explain Performing:
Members fulfill role responsibilities; perform to normative standards; strive for collective goals; cohesive group
Explain Adjourning:
Group disbands or reverts to earlier stage; evaluation of group success
Define Motivation, and what are the characteristics?
Motivation: The extent to which persistent effort is directed toward a goal
Effort
Persistence
Direction (also quality)
Goals
Define the four characteristics?
Effort: How much?
Energy, enthusiasm, vigor, intensity, etc
Persistence: How long?
Continued activation an direction despite hardships, obstacles, and failure
Direction: For what/quality
Good directions are channeling energy toward goals that benefit the organization
Goals: What you want to achieve
Intrinsic Motivation Vs. Extrinsic Motivation:
Intrinsic Motivation:
Wanting to do a task for its own sake (ex: find job interesting)
Usually self-applied, from inside
Strong and stable impacts
Extrinsic Motivation:
Working to obtain external reward (ex: money, recognition)
Usually applied by others (managers), from outside
Only work in certain situations, usually short lived
Why do we care bout motivation?
Key driving factor for task performance
Need Theories Vs Process Theories: (Theories of Motivation)
Need Theories:
Why are we motivated? Focusing on the satisfying/fulfilling needs
Ex: Self-determination theory, Maslow’s Theory, Alderfer’s ERG theory, McClelland’s Theory
Process Theories:
Focus on the underlying processes involved in motivating employees
How motivation occurs
Ex: Goal-setting theory, Expectancy theory, Equity Theory and Organizational Justice Theory
What is Maslows and Alderfer’s ERG Theory
Maslow’s Theory: Motivated by lowest unsatisfied need
ERG Theory: Need strength at one level depends on need satisfaction of other levels
The more lower-level needs are gratified, the more higher-level need satisfaction is desired
The less higher-level needs are gratified, the more lower-level need satisfaction is desired
What is Self-determination theory?
Focus is on the degree to which behaviour is self-motivated (autonomous) or not (controlled).
Autonomous Motivation: Occurs when people are self-motivated by intrinsic factors
Autonomous when all 3 are met:
Autonomy
Competence
Relatedness
Controlled Motivation: occurs when people are motivated to obtain a desired consequence or extrinsic reward.
On a continuum
Expectancy Theory:
Expectancy (E)
(Perceived) probability that effort will result in the intended behaviour/performance.
Instrumentality (I)
(perceived) probability that the performance will be followed by a particular outcome
Valence (V)
The subjective value of outcome
What is Goal-Setting Theory?
Explains and predicts how goals are translated into motivation
Goals are motivators of human action
Challenging Vs. Specific
Why do goals work?
Effort:
Effort varies in proportion to higher goals
Persistence:
Challenging goals lead people to work longer
Direction:
Goals direct attention to goal-relevant activities and materials
Strategies:
Searching for and developing strategies
What are Reward Follies? Why do they happen?
Occur when organizations “reward A while hoping for B”
Ex: want to encourage teamwork but reward the “best” individual team members
Why do they happen?
Sticking to outdated patterns of rewards and recognition
Failing look at the big picture
Focus on short-term vs long term
Relying on false assumptions about rewards
What is Cognitive Evaluation Theory? (part of SDT)
Introducing extrinsic rewards for behaviour that was previously intrinsically rewarded tends to decrease the overall motivation
“It was interesting” to “I did it for the money”
What is the Job Characteristic Model?
The core job characteristics that affect motivation:
Skill Variety: doing a variety of job activities using a variety of skills and talents
Task Identity: involves whole complete pieces of work from beginning to end with visible outcome
Task Significance: impact that a job has on other people
Autonomy: freedom to schedule one’s work activities and decide work procedures
Feedback from Job: information about one’s performance effectiveness
Motivating Potential Score =…
((Skill Variety + Task Identity + Task Significance)/3)*Autonomy*Feedback
The extent to which a job is designed to motivate
Equity Theory (again)
Individuals are motivated to maintain an equitable exchange relationship
When perceiving inequity
Behavioural and cognitive reactions
Implications of Equity Theory (motivation-wise):
Understanding the role of social comparison is crucial
Perceived underpayment/overpayment will negatively affect motivation
Who are the workers comparing themselves to? Knowing this might help develop strategies for reducing perceptions of inequity.
Define Decision-making:
The process of developing a commitment to some course of action
Perfect Rationality:
A decision strategy that is completely informed, perfectly logical, and oriented toward economic gain
Assumptions of Rational Model:
Problem is unclear and unambiguous
We know all options
We have clear preferences (for weighting)
Preferences are constant (weights are stable over time)
No time or cost constraints
Maximum payoff
Bounded Rationality:
Bounded Rationality: A decision strategy that relies on limited information and that reflects time constraints and political considerations
Managers try to act rationally, but they are limited by:…
Capacity to acquire and process information
Political Considerations
Self-interest:
Criteria for solution evaluation involve political factors to please others and factors that protect self-image
Time constraints
Reliance on flawed memory; Obtain too little or irrelevant information; potential ignorance of or miscalculation of values and probabilities; etc.
Define Confirmation Bias:
The tendency to seek out information that conforms to one’s definition of, or solution to, the problem.
Gather or remember information selectively
Interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position
Define Overconfidence Bias:
Based on past success, do not accurately perceive risks or overly willing to take risks
Define Escalation of Commitment:
Continuing to pursue a failing course of action because of sunk costs
The tendency to invest additional resources in an apparently failing course of action
Throw good resources after bad, acting as if one can recoup sunk costs
Prescriptions to Escalation of Commitment:
Seek disconfirming information about a chosen alternative
Reframe potential losses as potential gains (i.e. potential savings)
Structure incentives so that decision makers are not punished for inconsistency
Hand off decisions about whether to commit more resources to an investment to new decision makers
Avoid considering expended resources (sunk costs) when making decisions
Frequently remind decision-makers of the goals of the investment
What is Groupthink?
The capacity for group pressure to damage the mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgement of decision making groups
Why does Groupthink occur?
Strong identification with the group
Concern for group’s approval
Isolation of the group from other sources of information
Group leader promotes particular ideas/decisions
List Groupthink symptoms:
Illusion of Invulnerability (members overconfident - ignore danger signals)
Rationalization (problems are rationalized/explained away)
Illusion of Morality (decisions are perceived as morally correct)
Stereotypes of Outsiders (Unfavourable stereotypes of those outside the group)
Pressure to Conform (members convince themselves to avoid voicing opinions contrary to group)
Illusion of Unanimity (members perceive unanimous support)
Mindguards (some members “protect” the group from information that goes against decisions)
How to prevent Groupthink:
Encourage critical thinking, assign Devils’ Advocate
Use objective leaders (Ex: that do not state their preference first)
Ensure neither the leader nor any member dominates
Set norms that encourage dissent and communication
Consult outside experts who can challenge the view of core members
Use subgroups to work on the same problems
After reaching a preliminary consensus, hold a “second-guess” meeting
Introduce effective team structures: constructive conflict, communication, sufficient team diversity, optimal team size
What is Group Polarization?
Group discussion polarizes or exaggerates the initial positions of group members
Group members to shift toward more extreme positions
Discussion of already favoured ideas
Diffusion of responsibility
One-upmanship
Minimize with more structured decision making
Risky Shift Vs. Conservative Shift:
Risky Shift: The tendency for groups to make riskier decisions than the average risk initially advocated by individual team members
Conservative Shift: The tendency for groups to make less risky decisions than the average risk initially advocated by their individual members
Define Framing:
Framing: When decisions are framed as a choice between potential losses, people make riskier decisions
Gain Frame and Loss Frame
People avoid risk when outcome is framed positively
People seek risk when an outcome is negatively framed
What is Prospect Theory?
A loss ‘X’ hurts about twice as much as a gain of X pleases
People in a POSITIVE mood tend to…
Overestimate the likelihood of desired outcomes and underestimate the likelihood of undesired outcomes
Engage in more creative and intuitive decision making
Adopt simplified, shortcut decision making strategies, more likely to violate the rational model
People in a NEGATIVE mood tend to…
Overestimate the likelihood of undesired outcomes, underestimate likelihood of desired outcomes
Approach decisions in a more deliberate, systematic, detailed way
When can structure be useful?
No history of past interaction (structure compensates for lack of norms)
History of conflict (structure controls interaction)
Lots of people (structure makes it manageable)
Participants of unequal status (structure helps low status views get heard)
Scarce on time (structure forces more efficient use of time and more preparation)
Heterogeneous group (structure helps with different norms)
High need to get acceptance and commitment (structure helps with procedural justice)
Define Negotiation:
A decision making process among interdependent parties who have different preferences
Define and name the two Negotiation strategies:
Distributive Bargaining: Negotiation that seeks to divide up a fixed amount of resources;
a win-lose situation
Integrative Bargaining: Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win-win solution
a win-win situation
What is the Bargaining Zone?
Between the Aspiration point and the reservation point
Aspiration Point:
The point a negotiator wishes to achieve
Reservation Point:
The point a negotiator wishes not to go below
What is in between (overlap) Party A and Party B’s reservation point?
Settlement range
What is BATNA?
The best alternative to a negotiated agreement
The best you can do if the other person refuses to negotiate with you
How can you strengthen your BATNA?
Find other negotiation opportunities
Find other ways to get the outcome
Find other outcomes to achieve needs
How do you negotiate?
Assess personal goals, consider other’s goals, develop strategy
Identify target and resistance points
Target: What one would like to achieve
Resistance: Lowest outcome acceptable
Identify BATNA
Distributive Negotiation Strategies:
Threats/promises
Standing firm/making concessions
Persuasion/debate
Integrative Negotiation Strategies:
Exchange information, ask questions, listen carefully
Emphasize common interests, minimize differences
Increase resources
Frame differences as opportunities
Introduce superordinate goals (shared outcomes only achievable by collaboration)
What are the 3 most common mistakes in negotiation?
Irrational Escalation of Commitment
Continuing a previously chosen course of action beyond what a rational analysis would recommend
Belief in the Mythical Fixed-Pie
The assumption that your own interests directly conflict with the other party
Leads to “Win-Lose” thinking
Poor Anchors
An anchor is a standard against which future adjustments are measured
Often, the choice of an anchor
What are Effective Negotiation Strategies?
Planning is Critical
Define your negotiating zone
Set resistance and target point
Planning will tell you when to walk away from the table and when an agreement is acceptable
Improving your Bargaining Position
Begin with a positive overture
Address problems, not personalities
Pay little attention to initial offers
Emphasize win-win solutions
Create an open and trusting climate