1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Strengthen question rules
stimulus will always contain an argument
focus on the specifics of the conclusion
information in the stimulus is suspect
yield strong prephases
answer choices are accepted as given
differences between strengthen vs justify vs assumption questions
in order of certainty: assumption, justify, and strengthen
strengthen
strengthen stem indicator
support
strengthen stem indicator
helps
strengthen stem indicator
most justifies
strengthen stem indicator
Which one of the following if true most strengthens the argument?
strengthen stem
Which one of the following if true most strongly supports the statement above?
strengthen stem
Which one of the following if true does most to justfiy the conclusion above?
strengthen stem
Which one of the following if valid most clearly helps to strengthen the argument above?
strengthen stem
how to strengthen an arguement
identify the conclusion
personalize the argument
look for weakness/logical gaps in the argument
answers that strengthen analogies or survey are typically correct
what answer choices are typically incorrect in a strengthen question?
opposite answers
shell game
out of scope answers
what does an advertisment in the lsat usually indicate
faulty or deceptive reasoning in the stimulus
how to solve causality and strengthen questions
A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect
B. Show that when the cause occurs so does the effect (example)
C. Show when cause does NOT occur neither does the effect (typically an example)
D. eliminate possibility of a reverse relationship
Premises + Answer Choice = Conclusion
Justify Formula
The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed
justify the conclusion stem
what are the three features justify the conclusion question stems typically have?
the stem uses if or another sufficient condition indicator
the stem uses the phrase “allows the conclusion to be properly drawn” or “enables the conclusion to be properly drawn”
does not lessen degree of justification (ex most justifies)
“The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?”
justify the conclusion stem
“Which one of the following if assumed would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn?
justify the conclusion stem
“Which one of the following if true enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?
justify the conclusion stem
“Which one of the following if assumed enables the argument’s conclusion to be properly inferred?
justify the conclusion stem
Which one of the following is an assumption that would serve to justify the conclusion above?
justify the conclusion stem
The conclusion cold be properly drawn if it were true that the…
justify the conclusion stem
The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?
justify the conclusion stem
Most justify stimuli either use
Conditional Reasoning or contain numbers and percentages
Mechanistic approach to justify questions
Any new element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer
Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premises, normally do not appear in the correct answer
Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclusion are usually in the right answer
mechanistic approach rule
link new elements in the premises and conclusion and ignore elements common to both
cannot reliably determine becomes what distractor element
highly susceptible to inaccuracy
boycott becomes what distractor element
action
pretend to know the answer becomes what distractor element
trying to hide their ignorance
genuine creative genius becomes what distractor element
rare innovators
cautiously gathering and weighing the evidence becomes what distractor element
prudent
justify the conclusion fill in the blank questions
the blank is typically preceded by a premise indicator
statement that fill in the blank must be a premise that will confirm that conclusion