Standing (Article 3)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

4 Terms

1
New cards

Standing

Standing - Answering whether a plaintiff is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues. (Can the court hear this case?)

2
New cards

You must show all three to have standing:

You must show all three to have standing:

  1. Injury in Fact: Plaintiff has suffered or will immediately suffer an injury

  • Concrete and palpable

  • Not conjectural, hypothetical, or speculative

  • Look for ripeness

  1. Causation: Injury was caused by defendant’s conduct (fairly traceable)

  • Back to torts: proximate cause

  1. Redress: Relief sought will eliminate the harm alleged

  • Can a court provide any remedy (or the requested remedy)?

  • Look for mootness.

3
New cards

Third Party Standing

Rule: A plaintiff cannot gain standing by asserting the rights of another person who is not a party to the lawsuit. 

UNLESS there is:

  • A relationship between the plaintiff and rights-holder

  • A genuine obstacle to the rights-holder asserting his/her own rights and

  • The rights-holder’s rights will be diluted if not asserted by the plaintiff.

All 3 elements are required.

4
New cards

Associational Standing

  • An organization may have standing to sue on its own behalf when it sustains an injury as an organization.

  • Its members would have others standing to sue in their own right.

  • The interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organizations purposes; and

  • Neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of individual members in the lawsuit.